8 Comments

Thanks Jennifer. A global, coordinated war on humanity that is ideological idiocy. I agree with Dr. Michael Yeadon - these people are murderers and must be brought to justice. Everything that Katherine Watt at Bailiwicks New is spot-on. The trouble is, we are at war and very few people are aware of it. Peace. :-)

Expand full comment

A second opinion. Sasha Latypova- you've commented on some of her stuff. She has been making the rounds of the TV shows lately. One I found particularly informing was this one: https://www.bitchute.com/video/jFALCCKT1NW8/. She shows the contract process, which goes from the DOD through a money laundering company called ATI using a federal contract process called OTA. If you go to the ATI site and search around, you will find both pending ongoing, and terminated contracts related to the entire mRNA era funding. It appears the money for mRNA all went through this process- at least as much as we can publically view. I actually validated this. Here's the question. OTA does not require following any regulations, such as safety or quality. It does not require accounting for how the money was spent, at least to mortals. Using the OTA process means the intent is to, through the EUA process, not require any safety, efficacy, or manufacturing quality metrics for the program. The mRNA shot was a countermeasure, not a vaccine, not even a pharma product. Long introduction to the question. So, what does all our concerns about safety, efficacy, and quality matter. The FDA, CDC, the Pharmas, etc have no requirement for such things under contract. The government 3 letter agencies that did the tech work, the PsyOps, etc, as well as all the state agencies, had no requirements that they can be held to. The mRNA shots did not fall under FDA, CDC or any other regs. Extending the federal emergency covers everyone from liability. The FDA, the CDC, the Pharmas, the FBI, the ... state organizations, all not liable at all and can never be. The liability is at the DOD level and whoever directed them. But the laws protect the DOD. Why are we wasting our time trying to condemn the Pharmas? Performing legal exercises against the NIH organizations? Isn't the only solution at the state level, generally requiring new legislation at the state level? The feds are going to drip the guilt out, making the pharmas the scapegoats until the legal efforts run dry, then... until we get tired. Then the next phase begins and we will be sheeple again.

Expand full comment

(1) John Campbell has at least 3 youtube videos on this document. They are helpful supplements. (2) Can we consider this to be the same information that was submitted to the FDA for the EUA approval of the US version? (3) Why wasn't the serious AE, expected hospitalizations, and deaths covered in the document? Why wasn't transmission? (4) Do we have any FOIA documents that express those questions before acceptance, and if not why not? (5) When the EUA in the US was accepted, what was the efficacy and safety information provided to the FDA? The document that would be similar and perhaps more complete than the TGA. Do you have a link?

Expand full comment

US evil government paying Zuckerberg, Twitter etc. prevented the widespread sharing of information on FOI documents. Some of us involved in studying the US Court ordered releases had seen all of the issues raised in FOI-2389 elsewhere.

See what you can find here:

https://vaccines.shinyapps.io/abstractor/

Note that data mining genius level specialists like my friend OpenVAET are needed to extract data from the huge "XPT" files.

Another great resource is Judicial Watch

You can find slightly different levels of redaction in FOIs of the same document from UK, EU, USA and Australia. Happy hunting.

https://www.tga.gov.au/foi-disclosure-log

Expand full comment

Will follow up. I'm a member of dailyclout. I've been trying to get the attention of the editors and folks working in the organization. My letters and appeals don't get answered. Sad, since I have such a deep background on this topic, as well as AI. Data mining with AI is a specialty, as is Biophysics, which has led me to my activity in the Covid space.

Expand full comment

Thanks Jennifer.

As if further evidence was required regarding their evil, wicked & now malicious aforethought, was required. There it all is. Wretches all of them involved.

Expand full comment

Another excellent summary, Jennifer. Thank you.

It is important to go back and review what was clearly stated (or at least typed) back in the moment. Since they are trying to re-write the past, 1984-style, portraying themselves in the best possible light and not as the psychopathic premeditated killers and criminals we now know them to be.

The above notes are even worse when overlaid with the knowledge they 'trialed' the clotshot with handmade small batch versions. But they injected ~5B humans with mass produced versions that had virtually no quality controls (GMP?). Sasha and others have written about that angle, about the contaminations.

Even then, the SAE rate in trials were through the roof.

The final body count from this cull is almost too horrific to think about. My assessment is that it will far exceed the 'Spanish Flu', itself another deception accepted as fact by most. An earlier cull, deliberate or accidental matters not. The repetition of these events makes an 'accident' less and less likely.

Peace.

Expand full comment

I know this is a day late, but I don't know how to communicate the conclusions to the other comments related to this post. Sasha today (4/1) relied the just filed results of the Brooks Jackson Case. It is here: https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/brook-jacksons-case-dismissed-by. She includes a temporary link to the entire findings. This verifies, in court proceedings, all I have said in other comments to your post. Sasha attaches the full dismissal document, but it will only be there a while.

Everyone who cares about the process that we will have to take going forward to protect ourselves and our country from {who ever is in control of this whole ugly, evil scheme} has to read at least Sasha's summary of the document, but more about the actual contract and interpretations can be found in the full text of the judgement. Every reader must conclude:

(1)that our state government will offer the only protection, and that some state governments will offer no protection.

(2) that the inertia and attention span of state legislatures will be limited to the next couple months to end of year at the most, because we will be in the next election cycle.

(3) that the state legislators are already arguing "nothing to see any more" so it is not high on their priority list (eg, Trump legal issue is smokescreen to give more time to "sugar out" the Covid crimes)

(4) there is a profound amount of money going into the legislator's campaigns, the deep state contracts, the medical facility contracts, the medical professional society organizations, etc to "slow the process of realizing what has been done.

(5) the economy will seem to be more important even 3 months from now

So, what's the solution to this? Facts about all things will dribble out, but the Follow the Money and understanding the contracts will help focus the effort. Somehow, the state legislators must be lobbied to understand the threat and to act on it, even during election season and even though they may have a financial interest in not acting.

I find my state committee is kinda already running out of steam. I hate to say it, but the gen Xers don't have the stomach, attention span, or time for a prolonged fight. It will be up to the baby boomers that are left to lead the fight for their grandkids That's it. That's the solution. One last social revolution led by the baby boomers. After all, they put us where we are. And they are still leading the federal system (and my state, anyway).

Expand full comment