Share this comment
A second opinion. Sasha Latypova- you've commented on some of her stuff. She has been making the rounds of the TV shows lately. One I found particularly informing was this one: bitchute.com/video/jFAL…. She shows the contract process, which goes from the DOD through a money laundering company called ATI using a federal contract process c…
A second opinion. Sasha Latypova- you've commented on some of her stuff. She has been making the rounds of the TV shows lately. One I found particularly informing was this one: https://www.bitchute.com/video/jFALCCKT1NW8/. She shows the contract process, which goes from the DOD through a money laundering company called ATI using a federal contract process called OTA. If you go to the ATI site and search around, you will find both pending ongoing, and terminated contracts related to the entire mRNA era funding. It appears the money for mRNA all went through this process- at least as much as we can publically view. I actually validated this. Here's the question. OTA does not require following any regulations, such as safety or quality. It does not require accounting for how the money was spent, at least to mortals. Using the OTA process means the intent is to, through the EUA process, not require any safety, efficacy, or manufacturing quality metrics for the program. The mRNA shot was a countermeasure, not a vaccine, not even a pharma product. Long introduction to the question. So, what does all our concerns about safety, efficacy, and quality matter. The FDA, CDC, the Pharmas, etc have no requirement for such things under contract. The government 3 letter agencies that did the tech work, the PsyOps, etc, as well as all the state agencies, had no requirements that they can be held to. The mRNA shots did not fall under FDA, CDC or any other regs. Extending the federal emergency covers everyone from liability. The FDA, the CDC, the Pharmas, the FBI, the ... state organizations, all not liable at all and can never be. The liability is at the DOD level and whoever directed them. But the laws protect the DOD. Why are we wasting our time trying to condemn the Pharmas? Performing legal exercises against the NIH organizations? Isn't the only solution at the state level, generally requiring new legislation at the state level? The feds are going to drip the guilt out, making the pharmas the scapegoats until the legal efforts run dry, then... until we get tired. Then the next phase begins and we will be sheeple again.