A few days ago I posted about the Brunson vs. Adams case with the information I had gathered. Over the holiday weekend, I tried searching on social media, non-mainstream media, and on Twitter, and there was very little information about it. Those who did post about it on Twitter had the usual “attorney/lawyers” step up with replies that were…..well…..not very supportive of this case. Most stated that SCOTUS would not review the case and it would get tossed. Many other replies were that “this case will get dismissed by 10am on Monday morning.” Several others stated that “all of you wanna-be lawyers do not understand how this works so you should “sit this one out”. That was my second favorite reply as they suggested anyone who is NOT an attorney/lawyer could not possibly be smart enough to read a court docket. Gee, kind of like you have to be part of the CDC to state a covid “fact” or else it is disinformation? Hmm. The best reply over the weekend though, (my favorite reply actually) was “this case is worthless and the paper they printed it on would be better used as toilet paper for my morning dump”. OK that reply did make me laugh, and also made me wonder what kind of toilet paper they use in their home cause that sounded a little harsh and abrasive to use on such a delicate area. I hope they have a good plumber available! I much prefer Costco toilet paper, but I digress.
You are fantastic as are the Brunsons!🙏🏼
Hold and advance.
Thank you for all your work and for caring so much.
I can't blame people for being skeptical, it's been a disappointing few years. However, this is a very good sign they have taken the case on and set a date. Most people don't understand this case is not about election fraud itself but about process and immunity from crimes. It's probably the most important case they have heard in many years.
First of all, I am thrilled for you that your post got so many views! Yea! It deserved it. I hope they keep on comin'!
I saw this yesterday and thought of you instantly. (My bad for not sending you a "puff of smoke". ☹️) The fact that the SC is going to meet on Jan 6??? Just can't make it up. And the fact that the Brunson brothers are trumpet players..? The walls of Jericho and all? Can't make that up either.
That is what this case has the potential to do -- bring it all down...BTW, it looks like if the SC acknowledges the validity of the law and its penalties, buh-bye Ron Johnson. And for some reason, I just don't feel bad about that.
Thank you for the update.
Jennifer, thanks for the great posts and update. I live here in Utah. Can you elaborate further on what happens in conference? If you know...
Thanks - I will be continually praying that these truths come to full fruition
“All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.”
- Arthur Schopenhauer, Philosopher
Interesting, the Supreme Court clerk (!) actually called the Brunsons and asked how fast they could get the filing to them. They responded- two weeks. The Brunsons hurried and got it to them in one week... Praying! More about God: www.arkdiscovery.com
Sorry for the potentially stupid question, but why is Alma Adams’s name on the lawsuit? A NC Rep? Is it as simple as her name is the 1st alphabetically of all the named defendants? 🤓
This case will decide if "We the People" have to take the law into our own hands. Ex military will define the definition of what an oath means if these high priced corporate lawyers have conveniently forgotten what honesty and integrity mean and cost.
From the sources that i could find, less than 20% of the cases that make it to conference are reviewed. The others simply end there. I hope universe determines that this one is important enough to see justice done.
Excellent news! Thanks for posting this update.
How do I subscribe to your stack? I see no subscribe button. 🙁
The extent of corruption goes much further, my wife has been threatened since 2019 with illegal orders by the friend of court in wexford county michigan. The day before appeal hearing state charged me with terrorism for stating id use my first ammendment rights and stop there illegal actions by any force necessary and stated they are following the same lines as ruby ridge, well turning in grievance orders and telling them to cease and desist. We won appeal making there actions unlawful and the judge bound me over as a terrorist for stating the court official was committing a 14 year felony by intoducing falsified documents so there fore the actions took place during the commision of a felony. In other words his felony made it illegal to freely speak of ruby ridge even know ruby ridge is viewed as government over reach not that randy weaver was a terrorist.