4 Comments

"I give them the benefit of the doubt the first month of covid because there was a lot of “flying blind” and chaos on what to do. But beyond that time frame? No excuse."

I agree, but only if the first month is the actual first month of covid. By the time covid got here, in the US, Real Doctors across the world had figured out the need for immediate use of anti inflammatory drugs, anticoagulants and antihistamines etc. upon the start of the inflammatory covid stage / presentation in the er and/or admittance to the hospital.

These Real Doctors were telling the world the truth about effective life saving treatment, in real time, there on the internet, for anyone with even the most basic search ability, who was willing to put in the hours, to find. THE "FIX" WAS IN FROM THE BEGINNING TO SABOTAGE COVID TREATMENT.

in "who" document "Coronavirus- Outline of designs for experimental vaccines and therapeutics"

Draft version Jan 27, 2020 WHO/HEO/R&D Blueprint (‎‎‎‎nCoV)‎‎‎‎/2020.1 * One can see it is clear THE FIX IS IN AT THE "who". The US "representative" is Hilary D. Marston "No conflict of interest declared". she is the NIAID "fauci" stand-in, a big pharma fixer ( McKinsey & Company) "plant" and a Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation "plant". note "Appropriate WHO Confidentiality Undertakings were signed and submitted to WHO by all participating experts"

"Remdesivir was considered the most promising candidate".

a big pharma "Phase I clinical development such as a TMPRSS-2 inhibitor might merit further discussion" but no mention of bromhexine.

"Immunosuppressants and immunostimulators (e.g. corticosteroids/steroids) were also identified as products to be deprioritised" " although there is evidence of efficacy in the setting of severe illness."

"Chloroquine was also mentioned as product for which there is insufficient evidence to support its further investigation.

"Non-antiviral products not on the list provided, such as statins, heparin and high dose

vitamin C, were mentioned as products for which more discussion could be

considered." NONE EVER RECOMMENDED

SO KILL EARLY TREATMENT WITH HCQ AND OTHER GENERICS AND AND THEN FAIL TO ENDORSE STEROID TREATMENT EVEN THOUGH THEY KNEW THE PARAMETERS OF ITS PROPER USE

THESE PEOPLE CAN NO LONGER DIRECT WORLD HEALTH POLICY. JAK

*also known as WHO R&D Blueprint Informal consultation on prioritization of candidate therapeutic agents for use in novel coronavirus 2019 infection Geneva, Switzerland, 24 January 2020

Expand full comment

STUNNINGLY written article Doctor.

Dr. Pierre Kory Also testified in a Senate hearing. I watched it LIVE while trading the markets, following week it was banned from YouTube. Poof, be gone. The next video I ever saw of him, he was labeled an anti-vaccine Doctor.

Expand full comment

What they have done to Pierre Kory is just absolutely horrifying. The lengths they have gone to to deplatform, censor, smear, defame, is just beyond comprehension. Healthcare gets a bad rap (deservedly so, 90% of it is corrupt) but Kory is one of the good guys. That man is brilliant, and has fought so hard to save lives. He should be winning presidential medals and accolades from every medical institution around the globe for what he has done. I began following him religiously in late 2020, and when him and his colleagues developed the FLCCC protocol I have faithfully used it on myself, recommended it to people, and personally have “porch dropped” his I-recover protocol on numerous porches when I get the text “hey we have covid over here”. Just sent 3 out the door tonight to a newly diagnosed and 2 close exposures in the same family to the one who is sick. Not a single person I have seen was hospitalized or died, during delta or omicron, that I helped with the FLCCC regimen. Bucket list item of mine is to meet Dr. Kory someday and shake his hand, and personally thank him for what he has done. ❤️

Expand full comment

I remember reading this stat back in Spring 2020. It was clear that the people who went on vents didn't come off, and we were 'venting hard' to prevent spread.

Edit: Found it

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/over-80-covid-patients-placed-ventilators-new-york-have-colangelo/

In March is was estimated that although 960,000 patients in the US might need a ventilator, only about 200,000 machines were available. People are still talking about ventilators, but this month, the discussion has changed. A recent study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association reported that almost 90% of COVID patients placed on ventilators in New York between March 1 and April 4 died. The report shows that the mortality rate of those aged 65 and over was 97% and for those aged 18 to 65 was 76%. It's reported that generally 40% of patients with severe respiratory distress die while on ventilators. Over twice as many COVID patients are dying while intubated on a ventilator.

Expand full comment