11 Comments

Thanks Jennifer. I agree. They murdered JFK and RFK. They have lied to the American people for decades. "American Betrayal", by Diana West, is a great introduction to the history of lies. Peace.

Expand full comment

Government is not our friend . It never has been. Our founding fathers knew this and did the best they cold to educate people to that fact. It didn’t work.

Expand full comment

The real conspiracy theory is that all of the conspiracy theories are conspiracy theories. In reality WW3 started right as WW2 was drawing down,and the enemy is the freewill of humanity.

Expand full comment

I agree…….I even question if we are still in WW2 to this day……

Expand full comment

It makes me feel less hostile to imagine that they took a few years off...

Expand full comment

This is fascinating. And, given the times we find ourselves in today, also not surprising that the smoke and mirror game was alive and well back then, too.

Expand full comment

Eisenhower warned us, the rot was all around. Walter Cronkite was a socialist and did not deserve his halo as 'the most trusted man in America'.

Expand full comment

Kennedy knew too much. He didn't want to get involved in Vietnam. Eisenhauer and Kennedy were close. The CIA was gung ho on both Cuba and Vietnam. That had the motive, the operatives, including Oswald, and the weapons. Ballistics confirmed that the bullet didn't come from Oswald. The CIA lacks intelligence and it botches things up left right and centre.

Expand full comment

Kennedy also put the kabosh on operation northwoods which the defense department cooked up. They wanted to fly planes into buildings and other terrorist attacks on Americans and blame it on Cuba so they could attack it. Not long after Kennedy was dead.

Explanation here .

https://allnewspipeline.com/Globalists_Grooming_Americans_For_WW3_Nuclear_Armageddon_Climate_Lockdowns.php

Expand full comment

This lazy slur has been enormously successful, largely because most people want to feel that they understand the world about them – that, surely, they would be aware if anything dodgy was going on. Um, wrong!

Expand full comment

Yes, it was popularised and weaponised after the JFK FAKED assassination - yes the evidence clearly shows it was faked - very hard to take on board but it really was, however, the term was used by Karl Popper in "The Conspiracy Theory of Society," which was included in his collection of essays titled "Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge," published in 1963 - see 10m video on this essay - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KumNAOH33VM and it was used earlier than that.

https://occamsrazorterrorevents.weebly.com/jfk---fake-assassination.html

The term drives me to distraction because it so misdescribes what it is applied to.

I've just posted an article:

11 logical fallacies unmasked in the use of the terms "conspiracy theory" and "conspiracy theorist"

https://petraliverani.substack.com/p/11-logical-fallacies-unmasked-in

This is a summary of the fallacies (and I know there are more - you could probably somehow apply every fallacy known to man in the use of those terms):

1. The authorities decide which events are conspiracies - the Appeal to Authority fallacy

2. Only the majority expert voice counts, the minority expert voice is to be derided and ignored - the Appeal to Common Belief

3. Who’s calling conspiracy and who’s theorising? - the Strawman fallacy

Strawman 1 - Experts make no mention of conspiracy nor put forward theories

Strawman 2 - Refuters use the more specific and appropriate term, “psychological operation” or psyop

4. Selecting the obviously invalid argument - Cherry-picking

5. OMG! You’re one of those tinfoil-hatted people! - Argument from Intimidation fallacy

6. Your reasoning is based on bias, mine is rational - the Fundamental Attribution Error

7. Is the fact of conspiracy the main concern? - no, it’s the Big Lie fallacy technique used to control our minds

8. The sophisticated Big Lie - the addition of the False Dilemma fallacy

9. If those in power had done it they would have … - Hypothesis contrary to fact

10. That’s insane, that cannot be true - Argument from incredulity

11. When the rule is that they must “tell” us the truth underneath the propaganda how is the rejection of the narrative in the realm of “theory”? The Loaded Question fallacy

Expand full comment