I do not bring this up with jabbed friends and family because as far as I know there is nothing they can do about it other than what we should all be doing to optimize our health.
Please forgive my ignorance. Does this scarring show up on any test that may be done? Like a heart murmur or something? On the EKG or another test? Asking for a friend.
Another question or two come to mind. Was this an unintended side effect of the experimental vaccine or is it a feature? Was the silent ticking time bomb nature of the myocarditis intended to confuse the issue with the delay between vaccination and death? Plausible deniability. After all, they want us dead and would prefer not to be punished themselves.
You can often detect the myocardial scars with an MRI of the heart. As for the ticking time bomb nature of myocarditis and other late effects, I suspect they didn't exactly know how it would all play out or when. They didn't care because they had absolute immunity from legal liability under the PREP Act. The drug companies essentially injected self-replicating microscopic razor blades into human bodies and stood back to see what would happen.
The new cardiac multiple micro-scars (MMS) is different to myocarditis.
With normal myocarditis, there are tests.
But the new cardiac multiple micro-scars (MMS) currently has NO WAY to detect early! The study explained that the scars are very small, ~200 micrometer, so no imaging or test can help. The only sign is some arrhythmia, but it can be very mild and no one pay much attention on that, until some day an unexplained sudden cardiac arrest happens.
Noone knows for sure if it's intended or not, but if it is, it's perfect weapon indeed.
Let's see...with all the medical advances the modern stone age medical mafia claims have saved humanity, why not a test or method of determining the extent of these injuries? Then again, the poor soul found to have these hidden heart problems would be facing a medical system whose only course of action would be treatment with more deadly drugs. A no win situation.
Right after the vaccine rolled out my cousin- 28 year old male- got myocarditis, a blood clot in his lung, and the doctors said his liver looked like he had been drinking for 30 years (vax related not drinking related)…I was clued in from the get go…while he was in the ICU for 3 weeks and almost died 3 times…I asked his mother (my aunt) if she wanted me to send her some info on myocarditis and she said, “Please don’t, I don’t want to know.” So that is what we are dealing with here, folks…the majority of people are head in the sand, nothing to see here. It’s all very sad. I am hearing no less than 3 stories a day at this point of injuries or death from people I just randomly see throughout my days. May God bless us all!!!
Wondering how long until the data comes in showing myocarditis in those who have not been jabbed, but were in close proximity to those who had (shedding).
Abstract 10712: Mrna COVID Vaccines Dramatically Increase Endothelial Inflammatory Markers and ACS Risk as Measured by the PULS Cardiac Test: a Warning
Steven R Gundry
Originally published8 Nov 2021Circulation. 2021;144:A10712
This article has an expression of concern
Expression of Concern: Abstract 10712: Mrna COVID Vaccines Dramatically Increase Endothelial Inflammatory Markers and ACS Risk as Measured by the PULS Cardiac Test: a Warning
Abstract
Our group has been using the PLUS Cardiac Test (GD Biosciences, Inc, Irvine, CA) a clinically validated measurement of multiple protein biomarkers which generates a score predicting the 5 yr risk (percentage chance) of a new Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS). The score is based on changes from the norm of multiple protein biomarkers including IL-16, a proinflammatory cytokine, soluble Fas, an inducer of apoptosis, and Hepatocyte Growth Factor (HGF)which serves as a marker for chemotaxis of T-cells into epithelium and cardiac tissue, among other markers. Elevation above the norm increases the PULS score, while decreases below the norm lowers the PULS score.The score has been measured every 3-6 months in our patient population for 8 years. Recently, with the advent of the mRNA COVID 19 vaccines (vac) by Moderna and Pfizer, dramatic changes in the PULS score became apparent in most patients.This report summarizes those results. A total of 566 pts, aged 28 to 97, M:F ratio 1:1 seen in a preventive cardiology practice had a new PULS test drawn from 2 to 10 weeks following the 2nd COVID shot and was compared to the previous PULS score drawn 3 to 5 months previously pre- shot. Baseline IL-16 increased from 35=/-20 above the norm to 82 =/- 75 above the norm post-vac; sFas increased from 22+/- 15 above the norm to 46=/-24 above the norm post-vac; HGF increased from 42+/-12 above the norm to 86+/-31 above the norm post-vac. These changes resulted in an increase of the PULS score from 11% 5 yr ACS risk to 25% 5 yr ACS risk. At the time of this report, these changes persist for at least 2.5 months post second dose of vac.We conclude that the mRNA vacs dramatically increase inflammation on the endothelium and T cell infiltration of cardiac muscle and may account for the observations of increased thrombosis, cardiomyopathy, and other vascular events following vaccination.
I do not bring this up with jabbed friends and family because as far as I know there is nothing they can do about it other than what we should all be doing to optimize our health.
Please forgive my ignorance. Does this scarring show up on any test that may be done? Like a heart murmur or something? On the EKG or another test? Asking for a friend.
Another question or two come to mind. Was this an unintended side effect of the experimental vaccine or is it a feature? Was the silent ticking time bomb nature of the myocarditis intended to confuse the issue with the delay between vaccination and death? Plausible deniability. After all, they want us dead and would prefer not to be punished themselves.
You can often detect the myocardial scars with an MRI of the heart. As for the ticking time bomb nature of myocarditis and other late effects, I suspect they didn't exactly know how it would all play out or when. They didn't care because they had absolute immunity from legal liability under the PREP Act. The drug companies essentially injected self-replicating microscopic razor blades into human bodies and stood back to see what would happen.
The new cardiac multiple micro-scars (MMS) is different to myocarditis.
With normal myocarditis, there are tests.
But the new cardiac multiple micro-scars (MMS) currently has NO WAY to detect early! The study explained that the scars are very small, ~200 micrometer, so no imaging or test can help. The only sign is some arrhythmia, but it can be very mild and no one pay much attention on that, until some day an unexplained sudden cardiac arrest happens.
Noone knows for sure if it's intended or not, but if it is, it's perfect weapon indeed.
Let's see...with all the medical advances the modern stone age medical mafia claims have saved humanity, why not a test or method of determining the extent of these injuries? Then again, the poor soul found to have these hidden heart problems would be facing a medical system whose only course of action would be treatment with more deadly drugs. A no win situation.
Right after the vaccine rolled out my cousin- 28 year old male- got myocarditis, a blood clot in his lung, and the doctors said his liver looked like he had been drinking for 30 years (vax related not drinking related)…I was clued in from the get go…while he was in the ICU for 3 weeks and almost died 3 times…I asked his mother (my aunt) if she wanted me to send her some info on myocarditis and she said, “Please don’t, I don’t want to know.” So that is what we are dealing with here, folks…the majority of people are head in the sand, nothing to see here. It’s all very sad. I am hearing no less than 3 stories a day at this point of injuries or death from people I just randomly see throughout my days. May God bless us all!!!
Wondering how long until the data comes in showing myocarditis in those who have not been jabbed, but were in close proximity to those who had (shedding).
The way to hell just keeps getting wider.
https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/circ.144.suppl_1.10712
Abstract 10712: Mrna COVID Vaccines Dramatically Increase Endothelial Inflammatory Markers and ACS Risk as Measured by the PULS Cardiac Test: a Warning
Steven R Gundry
Originally published8 Nov 2021Circulation. 2021;144:A10712
This article has an expression of concern
Expression of Concern: Abstract 10712: Mrna COVID Vaccines Dramatically Increase Endothelial Inflammatory Markers and ACS Risk as Measured by the PULS Cardiac Test: a Warning
Abstract
Our group has been using the PLUS Cardiac Test (GD Biosciences, Inc, Irvine, CA) a clinically validated measurement of multiple protein biomarkers which generates a score predicting the 5 yr risk (percentage chance) of a new Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS). The score is based on changes from the norm of multiple protein biomarkers including IL-16, a proinflammatory cytokine, soluble Fas, an inducer of apoptosis, and Hepatocyte Growth Factor (HGF)which serves as a marker for chemotaxis of T-cells into epithelium and cardiac tissue, among other markers. Elevation above the norm increases the PULS score, while decreases below the norm lowers the PULS score.The score has been measured every 3-6 months in our patient population for 8 years. Recently, with the advent of the mRNA COVID 19 vaccines (vac) by Moderna and Pfizer, dramatic changes in the PULS score became apparent in most patients.This report summarizes those results. A total of 566 pts, aged 28 to 97, M:F ratio 1:1 seen in a preventive cardiology practice had a new PULS test drawn from 2 to 10 weeks following the 2nd COVID shot and was compared to the previous PULS score drawn 3 to 5 months previously pre- shot. Baseline IL-16 increased from 35=/-20 above the norm to 82 =/- 75 above the norm post-vac; sFas increased from 22+/- 15 above the norm to 46=/-24 above the norm post-vac; HGF increased from 42+/-12 above the norm to 86+/-31 above the norm post-vac. These changes resulted in an increase of the PULS score from 11% 5 yr ACS risk to 25% 5 yr ACS risk. At the time of this report, these changes persist for at least 2.5 months post second dose of vac.We conclude that the mRNA vacs dramatically increase inflammation on the endothelium and T cell infiltration of cardiac muscle and may account for the observations of increased thrombosis, cardiomyopathy, and other vascular events following vaccination.