It was a good interview by one of the best journalists working today. Many people who had a spectrum of backgrounds and beliefs worked together over several years to expose the Covid lies. The Covid disaster demonstrated that cancel culture and ideological purity, when applied to science, usually leads to bad policies and mass casualty e…
It was a good interview by one of the best journalists working today. Many people who had a spectrum of backgrounds and beliefs worked together over several years to expose the Covid lies. The Covid disaster demonstrated that cancel culture and ideological purity, when applied to science, usually leads to bad policies and mass casualty events. My new concern is that "our side" is now resorting to ideological purity tests, and accusations of guilt by association. People can have different points of view and different backgrounds without being bad. We solve problems by listening to different points of view, assessing their validity, and calmly coming to rational conclusions. Any other approach is just another form of wokeism. The Covid scam (by design) made people hostile and afraid of each other, and it is up to us to repair that damage too.
It was a good interview by one of the best journalists working today. Many people who had a spectrum of backgrounds and beliefs worked together over several years to expose the Covid lies. The Covid disaster demonstrated that cancel culture and ideological purity, when applied to science, usually leads to bad policies and mass casualty events. My new concern is that "our side" is now resorting to ideological purity tests, and accusations of guilt by association. People can have different points of view and different backgrounds without being bad. We solve problems by listening to different points of view, assessing their validity, and calmly coming to rational conclusions. Any other approach is just another form of wokeism. The Covid scam (by design) made people hostile and afraid of each other, and it is up to us to repair that damage too.