This is uncharted legal territory but as noted in my comment below this case does suggest that toxic contaminants in the mRNA product may be a path around the PREP immunity statute. The SV40 and other DNA fragments in the vials would have to be proven to be harmful (like the shards of glass in Remdesivir). The Michigan case is only a low…
This is uncharted legal territory but as noted in my comment below this case does suggest that toxic contaminants in the mRNA product may be a path around the PREP immunity statute. The SV40 and other DNA fragments in the vials would have to be proven to be harmful (like the shards of glass in Remdesivir). The Michigan case is only a lower court case that could be appealed to a higher court that could always decide the PREP Act authorizes gross negligence and homicide, but the manufacturers would likely settle out of court before taking a chance on an appeal going against them.
Thanks for the clarification. It will all come down to proof of harm and that Pharma knew it and did not disclose it. Not likely to happen. The eventual outcome might be large class action payouts (a large amount necessarily consumed by the legal work required); no "justice" done. Just speaking for a skeptical friend.
I don't think one has to even prove Pharma knew they were doing something wrong. All that is needed under tort law is violation of a duty of care. Allowing Remdesivir to be contaminated with glass shards is plain and simple negligence and damages can be collected if harm can be shown. Same thing with DNA/oncogenic SV40 in the shots. The wild card is whether the PREP Act gives them an absolute shield of immunity. I spent 40 years practicing law and medicine and I am considering coming out of retirement to hold the Pharma monsters legally responsible, along with the politicians and media conglomerates that enabled them. Personally I don't care if I make a dollar from it. I want these monsters brought to justice.
I encourage you to go for it. Only someone with your background and passion for retribution can take this on. Many have been harmed and the future only promises more of the same from Pharma/WHO/WEF for humanity.
This is uncharted legal territory but as noted in my comment below this case does suggest that toxic contaminants in the mRNA product may be a path around the PREP immunity statute. The SV40 and other DNA fragments in the vials would have to be proven to be harmful (like the shards of glass in Remdesivir). The Michigan case is only a lower court case that could be appealed to a higher court that could always decide the PREP Act authorizes gross negligence and homicide, but the manufacturers would likely settle out of court before taking a chance on an appeal going against them.
Thanks for the clarification. It will all come down to proof of harm and that Pharma knew it and did not disclose it. Not likely to happen. The eventual outcome might be large class action payouts (a large amount necessarily consumed by the legal work required); no "justice" done. Just speaking for a skeptical friend.
I don't think one has to even prove Pharma knew they were doing something wrong. All that is needed under tort law is violation of a duty of care. Allowing Remdesivir to be contaminated with glass shards is plain and simple negligence and damages can be collected if harm can be shown. Same thing with DNA/oncogenic SV40 in the shots. The wild card is whether the PREP Act gives them an absolute shield of immunity. I spent 40 years practicing law and medicine and I am considering coming out of retirement to hold the Pharma monsters legally responsible, along with the politicians and media conglomerates that enabled them. Personally I don't care if I make a dollar from it. I want these monsters brought to justice.
I encourage you to go for it. Only someone with your background and passion for retribution can take this on. Many have been harmed and the future only promises more of the same from Pharma/WHO/WEF for humanity.