They have to lead with ad hominem attacks because all of the facts fail to support their conclusions. They have abandoned all pretense. Fetal Cell Lines? Cue Jonathan Swift. Modestly, of course.
Well, I am neither an engineer nor a rocket scientist, but that does not make me ignorant of facts.
It does not require a degree to know it is foolish to jump out of a perfectly good airplane without a parachute and I'm not interested in making my own fuel to send a rocket into the neighbor's yard.
Listening to these "holier than thou's" who pontificate while ignoring their own blind spots is enough entertainment for a good snort of derision.
speaking of parachutes, did they ever do a randomized placebo controlled trial to prove they actually work? How can people use a parachute without scientific PROOF they actually work?
Their arrogantly condescending attitude reeks of desperation.
They know we're aware of their betrayal and they can no longer hide behind their white coats. They have no alternative but to attack like a cornered predator.
It's not just "holier than thou" it's the appeal to experts logical fallacy.
I will be the first to admit I am no immunologist, epidemiologist, vaccinologist, or virologist. But I can still decide not to take an intervention, and I have the perfect right to express my reasoning and disagree. Furthermore, I have every right to be completely wrong in my reasoning for doing so. There is no clause in freedom of speech. You can deem what I say as dangerous misinformation, tell me to pound sand, or give me the finger. That's your right as well.
At this point. I want to see how a virus is extracted directly from a human, cultured and isolated. I want to see control studies done using the same method with both no samples and healthy samples.If they can't provide these results and show sufficient evidence of doing so, then I am under no obligation to participate in whatever intervention they deem to be "mandatory."
You can run studies all day long, say that you have done something, but when you add in policy, or coercion into the mix, then you have to provide evidence. And not just peer reviewed data. I want to see clinical studies. I want to see studies where animals were used, or even better, willing volunteers who sign ethical waver to participate in a study.
They have to lead with ad hominem attacks because all of the facts fail to support their conclusions. They have abandoned all pretense. Fetal Cell Lines? Cue Jonathan Swift. Modestly, of course.
Tragically their schemes were not categorically rejected at the Proposal stage.
They do seem driven to follow through on their misguided goals. You have to give them that.
The rewards in fame, fortune, and power are irresistible to immoral individuals.
Well, I am neither an engineer nor a rocket scientist, but that does not make me ignorant of facts.
It does not require a degree to know it is foolish to jump out of a perfectly good airplane without a parachute and I'm not interested in making my own fuel to send a rocket into the neighbor's yard.
Listening to these "holier than thou's" who pontificate while ignoring their own blind spots is enough entertainment for a good snort of derision.
speaking of parachutes, did they ever do a randomized placebo controlled trial to prove they actually work? How can people use a parachute without scientific PROOF they actually work?
"These aborted fetuses obviously opted in to having their cell lines used! how DARE you suggest this is an issue?!?!"
Wow, speechless as to the arrogance of these assholes.
Vaccinations are like covering myself in honey and laying atop an ant hill...never given a split second of thought.
Well put!
Their arrogantly condescending attitude reeks of desperation.
They know we're aware of their betrayal and they can no longer hide behind their white coats. They have no alternative but to attack like a cornered predator.
They are predators. That's for sure.
It's not just "holier than thou" it's the appeal to experts logical fallacy.
I will be the first to admit I am no immunologist, epidemiologist, vaccinologist, or virologist. But I can still decide not to take an intervention, and I have the perfect right to express my reasoning and disagree. Furthermore, I have every right to be completely wrong in my reasoning for doing so. There is no clause in freedom of speech. You can deem what I say as dangerous misinformation, tell me to pound sand, or give me the finger. That's your right as well.
At this point. I want to see how a virus is extracted directly from a human, cultured and isolated. I want to see control studies done using the same method with both no samples and healthy samples.If they can't provide these results and show sufficient evidence of doing so, then I am under no obligation to participate in whatever intervention they deem to be "mandatory."
You can run studies all day long, say that you have done something, but when you add in policy, or coercion into the mix, then you have to provide evidence. And not just peer reviewed data. I want to see clinical studies. I want to see studies where animals were used, or even better, willing volunteers who sign ethical waver to participate in a study.