Holding the Line with Dr. Funtimes

Share this post

The Providence Health System in Oregon is back to vaccine mandates.

docbrown77.substack.com

Discover more from Holding the Line with Dr. Funtimes

Just delivering the truth, one day at a time
Over 1,000 subscribers
Continue reading
Sign in

The Providence Health System in Oregon is back to vaccine mandates.

Jennifer Brown
Sep 17, 2023
18
Share this post

The Providence Health System in Oregon is back to vaccine mandates.

docbrown77.substack.com
14
Share

With the “new and improved NOT a booster but a NEW vaccine entirely” covid 19 jab that is due to hit the market any day…..Oregon health system Providence is already going backwards to 2021 with a vaccine mandate.

If I worked for Providence, I would leave. I hope and pray that their employees band together and fight back. If half of their staff refuse, this kind of nonsense goes away.

They are allowing exemptions in the same way they allow for flu shot exemptions, the below photo is a response to someone who asked a question about exemptions:

The question becomes will the person requesting the exemption be granted the exemption, and will they be fired for getting the exemption.

18
Share this post

The Providence Health System in Oregon is back to vaccine mandates.

docbrown77.substack.com
14
Share
14 Comments
Share this discussion

The Providence Health System in Oregon is back to vaccine mandates.

docbrown77.substack.com
SteveInFlorida
Sep 17Liked by Jennifer Brown

No mandates. Ever. Your post yesterday is making a lot more sense:

https://www.theepochtimes.com/mkt_app/us/berkey-water-filter-maker-sues-epa-over-claims-that-its-products-are-pesticides-5492727?c=share_pos2&pid=iOS_app_share

We have used a Berkey filter for years - the filter removes 99%+ of covid strains. It uses silver. The EPA is trying to put them out of business.

Peace.

Expand full comment
Reply
Share
1 reply
Duct Tape
Sep 17Liked by Jennifer Brown

The letter clearly states that if an employee is not vaccinated they "... may be removed from the schedule, placed on unpaid leave, and may be subject to termination..." This looks like a great way to get rid of any undesirable, nonconformist troublemakers to me. The use of the word "may" gives the administration the option of persecution or not. I'm sure there are tort attorneys drooling in anticipation of the wrongful termination suits this sloppy language will bring about. I seriously doubt any "objectors" who are friends, drinking buddies, sex partners with the boss will get fired. The person who does their job and just doesn't want to arbitrarily inject poison into their arm will. Did the author of that ridiculously worded letter run it past legal?

Expand full comment
Reply
Share
3 replies
12 more comments...
Top
New
Community

No posts

Ready for more?

© 2023 Jennifer Brown
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start WritingGet the app
Substack is the home for great writing