Thanks Jennifer. I had two friends call me earlier this year, both transfected with gene-therapy shots, saying "My wife tested positive for covid; the doctor suggests paxlovid." I told them I would send the HCQ and IVM - no go. I told them to run the other way from paxlovid. They can't hear me and they don't see it. They actually think that testing, transfection and shit-drugs like paxlovid actually work. The image in their minds, put there by endless propaganda and truly ignorant "doctors" is FIXED there and it is very, very difficult to dislodge it. If there was ever a time to open your eyes to clearly see what is going on - that time is now. Thanks for all the great research and posts. Peace.
Weird how fast paxlovid was accepted by the pro vax even without any completed trials on it, but they kept rejecting ivermectin even after the trials showed how well it worked. How to break through this type of brainwashing is beyond me. Plus so many doctors showed their results after treating hundreds. It’s still considered a horse medicine.
I agree. Professor Matias Desmet says that it is virtually impossible to get someone to see the truth if they have been hypnotized by the propaganda. I was able to "flip" a couple of people; mostly because they had known me for 50+ years and I had never approached them with an urgent message before. Peace.
ABSOLUTELY NO new drugs should EVER be released without publicly completed studies. PERIOD.
I could have been a thalidomide baby. Fortunately, it was not allowed in the US. FOR GOOD REASON!
Protocols were developed for a reason. It used to be considered proper to follow them.
Used to be new drugs were only used on those who were dying and had no hope for survival when all other measures had been attempted and failed.
In recent years, it seems like the Wild, Wild West when it comes to rushing to production.
Drugs are released to (paid) raving reviews, heavily advertised on TV, only to be followed by the inevitable lawsuits due to damages or deaths.
The only way this will ever be reigned in is to firewall the watchdogs from Big Pharma and get the watchdogs back to actually working for the people. And allow the lawyers to sue anyone who breaks protocol. i.e. no indemnifying anyone
Crazy stuff, the corruption is in plain sight but remains unseen by most
In the same way credentialed types refute RFKjn's recent statements about missing jab control groups. Because he didn't say 'inert' placebo they try to BS past the truth, since they think it perfectly okay to put an equally toxic jab in the 'placebo' group.
Thanks Jennifer. I had two friends call me earlier this year, both transfected with gene-therapy shots, saying "My wife tested positive for covid; the doctor suggests paxlovid." I told them I would send the HCQ and IVM - no go. I told them to run the other way from paxlovid. They can't hear me and they don't see it. They actually think that testing, transfection and shit-drugs like paxlovid actually work. The image in their minds, put there by endless propaganda and truly ignorant "doctors" is FIXED there and it is very, very difficult to dislodge it. If there was ever a time to open your eyes to clearly see what is going on - that time is now. Thanks for all the great research and posts. Peace.
Weird how fast paxlovid was accepted by the pro vax even without any completed trials on it, but they kept rejecting ivermectin even after the trials showed how well it worked. How to break through this type of brainwashing is beyond me. Plus so many doctors showed their results after treating hundreds. It’s still considered a horse medicine.
I agree. Professor Matias Desmet says that it is virtually impossible to get someone to see the truth if they have been hypnotized by the propaganda. I was able to "flip" a couple of people; mostly because they had known me for 50+ years and I had never approached them with an urgent message before. Peace.
"EUA yanked soon." 😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣 That's a knee slapper!
Right? 😂😂 they gonna milk that EUA to the last painful drop
Ended it early because of unspecified reasons?
No kidding.
ABSOLUTELY NO new drugs should EVER be released without publicly completed studies. PERIOD.
I could have been a thalidomide baby. Fortunately, it was not allowed in the US. FOR GOOD REASON!
Protocols were developed for a reason. It used to be considered proper to follow them.
Used to be new drugs were only used on those who were dying and had no hope for survival when all other measures had been attempted and failed.
In recent years, it seems like the Wild, Wild West when it comes to rushing to production.
Drugs are released to (paid) raving reviews, heavily advertised on TV, only to be followed by the inevitable lawsuits due to damages or deaths.
The only way this will ever be reigned in is to firewall the watchdogs from Big Pharma and get the watchdogs back to actually working for the people. And allow the lawyers to sue anyone who breaks protocol. i.e. no indemnifying anyone
In this modern Apocalypse 'that' horse isn't named Pestilence.
It is Pharma. Big Pharma.
Just weigh up the horrors they've inflicted on our species.
Something radical is needed, not just doing the previous thing harder.
To start with we need to empower people, rather than dis-empowering them.
Peace.
Worse. Much worse incoming,
https://andybunting.substack.com/p/megadeaths
Crazy stuff, the corruption is in plain sight but remains unseen by most
In the same way credentialed types refute RFKjn's recent statements about missing jab control groups. Because he didn't say 'inert' placebo they try to BS past the truth, since they think it perfectly okay to put an equally toxic jab in the 'placebo' group.
Clown World is everywhere.
Peace.
Thanks Jennifer. "ended early". Really. Ended. As in Croaked/Died/Deaded.