Regarding that final point, the incentives were aligned against autopsies being performed. I read of cases where the 'government assistance' to pay for funeral costs would be null and void if there was an autopsy.
Somehow they inverted the burden of proof for the scamdemic. For Swine Flu in ~1970's ev…
Regarding that final point, the incentives were aligned against autopsies being performed. I read of cases where the 'government assistance' to pay for funeral costs would be null and void if there was an autopsy.
Somehow they inverted the burden of proof for the scamdemic. For Swine Flu in ~1970's every death had to be proven as NOT being from the jab. Now, we have to prove that it WAS the bioweapon. That is so totally perverse, to put that on grieving families, a David Vs Goliath contest.
The human toll is already ghastly. They haven't stopped yet, which means there is nothing that could happen which will make them choose to stop.
Thank you Jennifer. And to Peter also.
Regarding that final point, the incentives were aligned against autopsies being performed. I read of cases where the 'government assistance' to pay for funeral costs would be null and void if there was an autopsy.
Somehow they inverted the burden of proof for the scamdemic. For Swine Flu in ~1970's every death had to be proven as NOT being from the jab. Now, we have to prove that it WAS the bioweapon. That is so totally perverse, to put that on grieving families, a David Vs Goliath contest.
The human toll is already ghastly. They haven't stopped yet, which means there is nothing that could happen which will make them choose to stop.
Peace.