https://www.ntd.com/fda-settles-ivermectin-case-agrees-to-remove-controversial-stop-it-post_981178.html Remember this little gem? Two of my favorite fierce fighters for Ivermectin, Dr. Mary Bowden and Dr. Paul Marik, filed a suit against the FDA for their anti-ivermectin rhetoric. And on March 21st, the court found in their favor.
Some of the SCOTUS questions in the recent Missouri case revolved around the government having the right, in once in a life time pandemic, to censor speech or as they like to term censoring disinformation for the public good. I don’t know how you can make that argument given the government was the one spreading disinformation the entire time and we have the receipts to prove it. They don’t care that they got caught and they’ll do again. The legal lengths hospitals went to keep Ivermectin from patients also needs to be addressed.
Remember, EUA cannot be granted if there exists a viable treatment. To get their cushy board seats at Pfizer, they had to discredit the plethora of drugs that safely treated the disease. That ended killing millions. Then the phony experimental vaccines came on the scene and killed millions more. Not one person has been held accountable for this.
We are shortsighted to continue to speak about this as a 1st Amendment/freedom issue, or even a doctor discretion issue. This is a crime because persons with power, initiated control and propaganda measures to withhold life-saving medications from patients. I believe we should identify several people in Massachusetts, New York, and New Jersey (the most affected areas) who ordered the control measures and/or the propaganda and ask the sheriffs in the areas where they reside to bring criminal charges for murder against them.
Doctor, you aren't the first substacker this week to post on this Ivermectin news, but you're always direct and you're my fav, so I'm sharing this far and wide, especially with my Veterinarian friends who guffawed and took the jab, because, you know, the horse thing.
Some of the SCOTUS questions in the recent Missouri case revolved around the government having the right, in once in a life time pandemic, to censor speech or as they like to term censoring disinformation for the public good. I don’t know how you can make that argument given the government was the one spreading disinformation the entire time and we have the receipts to prove it. They don’t care that they got caught and they’ll do again. The legal lengths hospitals went to keep Ivermectin from patients also needs to be addressed.
Remember, EUA cannot be granted if there exists a viable treatment. To get their cushy board seats at Pfizer, they had to discredit the plethora of drugs that safely treated the disease. That ended killing millions. Then the phony experimental vaccines came on the scene and killed millions more. Not one person has been held accountable for this.
We are shortsighted to continue to speak about this as a 1st Amendment/freedom issue, or even a doctor discretion issue. This is a crime because persons with power, initiated control and propaganda measures to withhold life-saving medications from patients. I believe we should identify several people in Massachusetts, New York, and New Jersey (the most affected areas) who ordered the control measures and/or the propaganda and ask the sheriffs in the areas where they reside to bring criminal charges for murder against them.
Goooood Mornin' Covidscam!
(said in Robin Williams' characters voice)
Doctor, you aren't the first substacker this week to post on this Ivermectin news, but you're always direct and you're my fav, so I'm sharing this far and wide, especially with my Veterinarian friends who guffawed and took the jab, because, you know, the horse thing.
Shouldn't there be like an self recriminating PSA that the FDA pays for that says something like "Seriously, FDA, Stop it?"
Thank you for posting this information. I would not have seen it otherwise. Thanks so much.