https://www.medpagetoday.com/neurology/dementia/111252?xid=nl_mpt_Neurology_update_2024-07-26&mh=22c3cd8ebe0a923b5ca6e6e20f1222e0&utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Automated%20Specialty%20Update%20Neurology%20BiWeekly%20FRIDAY%202024-07-26&utm_term=NL_Spec_Neurology_Update_Active
I don’t even have words for this garbage.
They are trying to suggest that getting the synthetic recombinant version of the Shingles vaccine is “better” than the live virus version because it reduces dementia risk.
But.
That is not the truth. They happened to notice that patients who received the recombinant version of the vaccine had 164 extra days before a dementia diagnosis was made.
That, my friends, is NOT prevention. It is junk science. I can guarantee you that shingles vaccine had ZERO to do with a delayed dementia diagnosis. This will be the next marketing tactic: hey get your shingles vax it can prevent dementia.
They will stop at nothing to keep making money and injecting this crap into every human body they can.
Hum, no control group with zero jab. So both jabs could accelerate Alzheimers, and this study would not be able to tell.
The shingles vaccine is worthless to begin with. Long ago the VA talked me into getting it. A few months later I enjoyed my first raging case of shingles. The VA Doctor explained that sometimes it takes 2 vaccine applications to become effective. I was more gullible/conditioned then and took the second jab. Lo and behold, a month or so later I got to enjoy shingles AGAIN. Another dose of vaccine was offered, but I declined. Since then I have had shingles off and on a few more times. Like the vaccine would have altered that outcome at all! Ha Ha Ha. (OK, the vaccines probably got the ball rolling in the first place.)
As far as the < 6 month delay in dementia onset goes, that isn’t even a statistical rounding error let alone a standard deviation issue. There is no basis whatsoever for the dementia prevention claim.
They want us dead.