Pretty amazing how a lower court can totally misread FACTS!
This entire debacle has been driven by mis- and dis-information except on the "alternative" (banned) sites (we're all crazies for being real scientists, that is, we ask questions).
The last 3 lines of page 8 in the brief pretty much sum up the reason for this appeal:
Pretty amazing how a lower court can totally misread FACTS!
This entire debacle has been driven by mis- and dis-information except on the "alternative" (banned) sites (we're all crazies for being real scientists, that is, we ask questions).
The last 3 lines of page 8 in the brief pretty much sum up the reason for this appeal:
"What is Appellees defense? Because a pandemic ensued, they could ignore
the emergency protocols they volunteered to perform, which were designed to
protect Appellants' fundamental rights during a federally declared emergency"
Are inability to discern illogical arguments a side effect of TDS? The Jab? Brainwashing? All of the Above?
Pretty amazing how a lower court can totally misread FACTS!
This entire debacle has been driven by mis- and dis-information except on the "alternative" (banned) sites (we're all crazies for being real scientists, that is, we ask questions).
The last 3 lines of page 8 in the brief pretty much sum up the reason for this appeal:
"What is Appellees defense? Because a pandemic ensued, they could ignore
the emergency protocols they volunteered to perform, which were designed to
protect Appellants' fundamental rights during a federally declared emergency"
Are inability to discern illogical arguments a side effect of TDS? The Jab? Brainwashing? All of the Above?