Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Joel Smalley's avatar

Not quite. In fact, not even close. Every time he says "antivaxxers won", his disingenuousness rises more and more to the top. The fact he used the term "antivaxxer" already speaks volumes. He then makes it very clear that "we" won due to heuristics and some incredible distrust of government and authority, whereas his "losing" position was in spite of all his fancy "analytics". If he had contritely admitted that he misinterpreted the data or, in fact, his heuristic of blindly trusting the government and other "experts" is what landed him in the legitimately uncomfortable position of unknown, long term potentially adverse consequences of being "vaccinated", whereas our strict adherence to the evidence is what kept us safe then sure, it is what you say it is.

Expand full comment
Jimmy Gleeson's avatar

I've watched this video before, and I agree with what has been said elsewhere. This is not a "win" for us. You think I enjoy being right about something that 80% of the people I know took? And we are left with a couple of messes. We want to know why this even had to happen to begin with. If the official narrative came off to tell us it was engineered in a lab and that Covid had been "gain of functioned" to cause more long term problems, this I might be inclined to believe it. But for the most part, this all appears to be a whole crap ton of panic that never had to happen.

Expand full comment
31 more comments...

No posts