This is a must watch. Dr. Buckhaults is a PhD from USC who specializes in the study of cancer at the molecular level. Namely, how DNA changes in our bodies lead to increased cancer risk. He has a tremendous presentation here discussing what he found covid vaccines to be doing to people.
I posted 3 comments/replies to comments on Kevin's Substack:
COMMENT 1:
Thank you Kevin. I have followed Dr. Rancourt's work since April 2020 when he published "Masks Don't Work". I also read his analysis of the southern hemisphere; the key take-away being that, at the time of publication, the number of deaths caused by transfection exceeded 13 million people. It is very difficult for people to grasp that these deaths were predicted, the perpetrators own publications show the work that was conducted and the goal, which is de-population. Please note that Dr. Rancourt has written about the fact that ALL economic systems always drift towards totalitarianism, and that totalitarian systems always fail. The United States embraced eugenics programs in the 1920's and 1930's - read "War Against The Weak", by Edwin Black. Finally, please watch this video which connects a lot of the dots:
I'm an MIT dropout. I was an "A" student. I was a decent applications "engineer". I can see patterns that I have not seen since 1930's Germany. Dr. Peter McCullough can obviously see them too:
In the United States, we have never been to this point before. Thanks to honest, truth-telling warriors like you, we are making progress in showing people the details of the greatest crime in history. I pray that you continue your very important work - thank you.
Finally - NO PERSON should have ever received an mRNA product, especially seniors. Peace.
COMMENT 2:
His opening statements are 100% incorrect. See Mathew Crawford's work at Rounding The Earth Substack - the transfection shots never had any efficacy, ZERO. The transfection shots did not save a single life - ZERO. See Dr. Denis Rancourt's work. He also states that there were no alternatives - 100% incorrect; Fauci published a paper in 2015 that identified hydroxychloroquine as basically a vaccine for corona viruses. The spike protein is a toxin - it should never be introduced into the human body. A lot of his testimony is following the big pharma narrative, designed to make people think that people actually had "good intentions" with the shots. Stick to the contamination professor, your comments regarding efficacy and intention will be proven false in due time. Peace.
COMMENT 3:
Read this post by Sasha Latypova and you will understand the professor's testimony and why there is an inherent dichotomy in his position:
If you follow Meryl Nass's work and her recent interview with Dell Bigtree on the Highwire; the "professor" has protections under the PREP act and the EUA, as long as he does not deviate from the dictated narrative - he stays on the narrative in his testimony. He actually thinks mRNA "technology" is a good thing! The "professor" is considered a COUNTERMEASURE under the EUA legal structure, as such, he is protected from prosecution - as long as he sticks to the same sick story.
Highwire video: BIO WAREFARE EXPERT EXPOSES EXPOSES W.H.O. PANDEMIC TREATY THREAT ( In the video scroll box on the home page. ) KEY TAKEAWAY: Every criminal, under EAU, was paid up front - many have already spent the money - Meryl Nass.
Dr. Buckhaults is back on Twitter/X: https://twitter.com/P_J_Buckhaults His comments need to be read to understand his perspective. He's in a really tough situation, being on faculty.
I agree with Dr. Buckhaults that we should not ascribe malevolent motive when incompetence will suffice as an explanation. However I think the incompetent buffoons have now realized their mistake (leaving hundreds of billions of DNA fragments in lipid nanoparticle delivery vehicles) but they are unable to admit what they did because the the political, economic and reputational consequences would be so great. The cover-up has become the crime, incompetence is no longer an excuse, and they are now complicit in one of the greatest mass murders in history because they have continued the "safe and effective" charade long after any reasonable person would recognize the mortal dangers. Even if this did not start as a genocidal plot it has become one, and our current political and leaders and mass media liars have become co-conspirators.
I disagree with your assertion that we cannot ascribe malice. Hanlon's Razor is just the sort of thing someone who intends harm would want you to believe. "Oh, you can't punish me because I'm not mean, I'm merely incompetent. Accidents happen". Bullshit. Malice is the ONLY explanation for evil to occur on this grand a scale. The first time I heard someone who intended me harm invoke Hanlon's Razor I had to ask them about Hitler's Germany, Pol Pot, the Soviet Union, etc. Oddly they did not have a comeback. That encounter did not resolve as they envisioned. Hanlon's Razor is another form of aggression. It is gaslighting.
Why rely on speculation when the provable facts demonstrate a crime? Any prosecutor who overcharges a crime risks losing an easily winnable case. Jumping to the "intentional from the outset" conclusion sacrifices credibility, and usually means you never get to the ultimate truth. I knew some of these people professionally and they were more idiotic than evil. The evidence indicates they created Covid in Wuhan, panicked when it escaped from the lab, and lied to cover up the origins. Desperate to limit the damage, they rushed a flawed vaccine to approval and (in reckless and wanton disregard of the dangers) injected it into a billion people, killing and maiming many of them (clearly a crime). Even worse, they denied life-saving treatments to millions of people along the way to assure approval of the vaccine, thereby wantonly killing many others. Maybe it was genocidal from the beginning, but neither of us really knows that at this point, and in my opinion we lose credibility by relying on speculation.
There was such a long chain of decisions that lead us to the disaster. If any one of them had been different, the outcome would have been vastly different. This chain could have been broken, instead it was maintained and strengthened. The odds that this was all just a mistake are infinitesimally tiny. Then there were the long succession of lies. About the origin, the effectiveness of the vaccine/masks/social distancing, the bizarre denial of proven medications, the insistence on ventilators to kill patients, New York intentionally sending COVID positive patients into quarantined nursing homes, etc. Credibility? Your desire to mitigate the abominable, catastrophic decisions with no predictable consequence other than disaster is troubling. Too many players in a coordinated game all agreeing to the same lies. The COVID tragedy was NOT an accident.
I think you meant minimize instead of mitigate. Your outrage about the Covid catastrophe is justified, and I didn't say the catastrophe was an accident (only the initial lab release). I think the catastrophe was the result of malformed incompetent human beings with a toxic ideology being put in positions of responsibility. I don't think they needed a play book. They just improvised like other idiots with toxic ideologies have improvised throughout history. In the beginning it was mostly about catastrophisizing the Covid outbreak to make sure Donald Trump lost the election, but even after that was accomplished they couldn't stop. We both agree mass murder was committed (and is still in progress).
No. I meant mitigate. You offered incompetence as an excuse as opposed to intentional actions. That is mitigation. "Improvisation" sounds an awful lot like acting with intention. One improvises to steer events in a certain direction. I believe even more mass murder is planned and will be inflicted with intention. We haven't seen the beginning of this.
BTW, this wasn't to the Senate. This was a joint committee, 3 house members, 3 senate members. This is the first of what we assume to be several meetings. It will take a while to absorb the testimony of the witnesses before the next meeting is held. Running commentary on this testimony, how we got this to happen, then what happens as time goes on is on my substack. This took the better part of 2 years to happen. We still have a couple dozen bills stalled in the legislature on both sides. The sessions are teaching us that there are more that have to be written. The language of some existing bills will have to change or we will have to submit new bills to cover what we've learned and will learn.
Thanks Jennifer. I follow Kevin McKernan on Substack. He wrote a post about the testimony in SC:
https://anandamide.substack.com/p/south-carolina-senate-hearing
I posted 3 comments/replies to comments on Kevin's Substack:
COMMENT 1:
Thank you Kevin. I have followed Dr. Rancourt's work since April 2020 when he published "Masks Don't Work". I also read his analysis of the southern hemisphere; the key take-away being that, at the time of publication, the number of deaths caused by transfection exceeded 13 million people. It is very difficult for people to grasp that these deaths were predicted, the perpetrators own publications show the work that was conducted and the goal, which is de-population. Please note that Dr. Rancourt has written about the fact that ALL economic systems always drift towards totalitarianism, and that totalitarian systems always fail. The United States embraced eugenics programs in the 1920's and 1930's - read "War Against The Weak", by Edwin Black. Finally, please watch this video which connects a lot of the dots:
https://twitter.com/gunthertree2/status/1702140946668810462
I'm an MIT dropout. I was an "A" student. I was a decent applications "engineer". I can see patterns that I have not seen since 1930's Germany. Dr. Peter McCullough can obviously see them too:
https://rumble.com/v3azedn-modern-medicines-great-controversy-dr.-peter-mccullough.html
In the United States, we have never been to this point before. Thanks to honest, truth-telling warriors like you, we are making progress in showing people the details of the greatest crime in history. I pray that you continue your very important work - thank you.
Finally - NO PERSON should have ever received an mRNA product, especially seniors. Peace.
COMMENT 2:
His opening statements are 100% incorrect. See Mathew Crawford's work at Rounding The Earth Substack - the transfection shots never had any efficacy, ZERO. The transfection shots did not save a single life - ZERO. See Dr. Denis Rancourt's work. He also states that there were no alternatives - 100% incorrect; Fauci published a paper in 2015 that identified hydroxychloroquine as basically a vaccine for corona viruses. The spike protein is a toxin - it should never be introduced into the human body. A lot of his testimony is following the big pharma narrative, designed to make people think that people actually had "good intentions" with the shots. Stick to the contamination professor, your comments regarding efficacy and intention will be proven false in due time. Peace.
COMMENT 3:
Read this post by Sasha Latypova and you will understand the professor's testimony and why there is an inherent dichotomy in his position:
https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/update-on-chd-lawsuit-challenging?publication_id=870364&post_id=137105662&isFreemail=false&r=1s5t3k
The Prep Act. Peace. (Translation: He's walking a tightrope between his conscious and his PREP act immunity; he's following the narrative. Peace.)
_________________________________________________________________________________
If you follow Meryl Nass's work and her recent interview with Dell Bigtree on the Highwire; the "professor" has protections under the PREP act and the EUA, as long as he does not deviate from the dictated narrative - he stays on the narrative in his testimony. He actually thinks mRNA "technology" is a good thing! The "professor" is considered a COUNTERMEASURE under the EUA legal structure, as such, he is protected from prosecution - as long as he sticks to the same sick story.
Highwire video: BIO WAREFARE EXPERT EXPOSES EXPOSES W.H.O. PANDEMIC TREATY THREAT ( In the video scroll box on the home page. ) KEY TAKEAWAY: Every criminal, under EAU, was paid up front - many have already spent the money - Meryl Nass.
https://thehighwire.com/
PEACE!
This makes me so mad. Getting fired over this and listening to this is making me crazy.
Dr. Buckhaults is back on Twitter/X: https://twitter.com/P_J_Buckhaults His comments need to be read to understand his perspective. He's in a really tough situation, being on faculty.
I agree with Dr. Buckhaults that we should not ascribe malevolent motive when incompetence will suffice as an explanation. However I think the incompetent buffoons have now realized their mistake (leaving hundreds of billions of DNA fragments in lipid nanoparticle delivery vehicles) but they are unable to admit what they did because the the political, economic and reputational consequences would be so great. The cover-up has become the crime, incompetence is no longer an excuse, and they are now complicit in one of the greatest mass murders in history because they have continued the "safe and effective" charade long after any reasonable person would recognize the mortal dangers. Even if this did not start as a genocidal plot it has become one, and our current political and leaders and mass media liars have become co-conspirators.
I disagree with your assertion that we cannot ascribe malice. Hanlon's Razor is just the sort of thing someone who intends harm would want you to believe. "Oh, you can't punish me because I'm not mean, I'm merely incompetent. Accidents happen". Bullshit. Malice is the ONLY explanation for evil to occur on this grand a scale. The first time I heard someone who intended me harm invoke Hanlon's Razor I had to ask them about Hitler's Germany, Pol Pot, the Soviet Union, etc. Oddly they did not have a comeback. That encounter did not resolve as they envisioned. Hanlon's Razor is another form of aggression. It is gaslighting.
Why rely on speculation when the provable facts demonstrate a crime? Any prosecutor who overcharges a crime risks losing an easily winnable case. Jumping to the "intentional from the outset" conclusion sacrifices credibility, and usually means you never get to the ultimate truth. I knew some of these people professionally and they were more idiotic than evil. The evidence indicates they created Covid in Wuhan, panicked when it escaped from the lab, and lied to cover up the origins. Desperate to limit the damage, they rushed a flawed vaccine to approval and (in reckless and wanton disregard of the dangers) injected it into a billion people, killing and maiming many of them (clearly a crime). Even worse, they denied life-saving treatments to millions of people along the way to assure approval of the vaccine, thereby wantonly killing many others. Maybe it was genocidal from the beginning, but neither of us really knows that at this point, and in my opinion we lose credibility by relying on speculation.
There was such a long chain of decisions that lead us to the disaster. If any one of them had been different, the outcome would have been vastly different. This chain could have been broken, instead it was maintained and strengthened. The odds that this was all just a mistake are infinitesimally tiny. Then there were the long succession of lies. About the origin, the effectiveness of the vaccine/masks/social distancing, the bizarre denial of proven medications, the insistence on ventilators to kill patients, New York intentionally sending COVID positive patients into quarantined nursing homes, etc. Credibility? Your desire to mitigate the abominable, catastrophic decisions with no predictable consequence other than disaster is troubling. Too many players in a coordinated game all agreeing to the same lies. The COVID tragedy was NOT an accident.
I think you meant minimize instead of mitigate. Your outrage about the Covid catastrophe is justified, and I didn't say the catastrophe was an accident (only the initial lab release). I think the catastrophe was the result of malformed incompetent human beings with a toxic ideology being put in positions of responsibility. I don't think they needed a play book. They just improvised like other idiots with toxic ideologies have improvised throughout history. In the beginning it was mostly about catastrophisizing the Covid outbreak to make sure Donald Trump lost the election, but even after that was accomplished they couldn't stop. We both agree mass murder was committed (and is still in progress).
No. I meant mitigate. You offered incompetence as an excuse as opposed to intentional actions. That is mitigation. "Improvisation" sounds an awful lot like acting with intention. One improvises to steer events in a certain direction. I believe even more mass murder is planned and will be inflicted with intention. We haven't seen the beginning of this.
BTW, this wasn't to the Senate. This was a joint committee, 3 house members, 3 senate members. This is the first of what we assume to be several meetings. It will take a while to absorb the testimony of the witnesses before the next meeting is held. Running commentary on this testimony, how we got this to happen, then what happens as time goes on is on my substack. This took the better part of 2 years to happen. We still have a couple dozen bills stalled in the legislature on both sides. The sessions are teaching us that there are more that have to be written. The language of some existing bills will have to change or we will have to submit new bills to cover what we've learned and will learn.
I presented at this SC "listening session." Dr. Lindsay passionately discussed Dr. Buckhaults' presentation. You will see many substack posts on her presentation. References to both are contained here: https://aletheiatheyounger.substack.com/p/experience-with-scheduling-a-state-956 and https://aletheiatheyounger.substack.com/p/experience-with-scheduling-a-state-df6.
These posts have been reviewed and the assessment is that they are accurate, balanced commentaries.