"There is always that 1% of the time they get it right, right?" Yes - but in their own way.
The case in point I was referring to was the study published in the nejm. It is titled "Therapeutic anticoagulation with heparin in critically ill patients with Covid-19" published aug 2021.
The supplementary data shows 23 pages of institutions and researchers participating , an armada of big research.
All that to show that when a treatment is started too late it does not work. "In critically ill patients with Covid-19, an initial strategy of therapeutic-dose anticoagulation with heparin did not result in a greater probability of survival to hospital discharge"
The clear covid truth is that from april 2020 practical treatment protocols to prevent covid clotting - from early treatment prevention of the need for anticoagulation, to timely initiation of anticoagulation in the outpatient setting, to asap initiation of anticoagulation and treatment for inflammation upon admittance to the hospital - was known, in practice, demonstrated safe and effective, with low cost and world wide availably.
FEW DIE FROM COVID - MANY TORTURED AND MURDERED - BY FAILURE TO TREAT.
All this with a group of clinicians that could be listed on one page.
(the singapore protocol, with the clotting work done by the Italians, the FLCCC group in the US, with Dr Darrell DeMello's treatment protocol in India, and with the clinical knowledge developed by REAL DOCTORS WHO ACTUALLY TREATED COVID PATIENTS here and there all over the world).
The ONLY THING "they" (big medical published in nejm) got right was this comment "Despite demonstrable activation of coagulation in multiple organ systems in patients with severe Covid-19, it is possible that initiation of therapeutic-dose anticoagulation after severe Covid-19 has developed may be too late to alter the consequences of established disease processes.
YEP. Kind of like the ivermectin studies where they stated it did not work at all, but they waited until day 10-14 and gave sub-therapeutic doses. The trial was designed to fail, and inaccurately portrayed ivermectin as a worthless zero in the treatment of covid. Dr. Pierre Kory did a round-table with Steve Kirsh and Alex Berenson this last week and he perfectly stated the corruption of these medical journals and their stance on evidence based treatment, calling it bunk. I agree with him. Evidence based practice and clinical based journals are not quality any longer. I call them out in several posts on here. Steve Kirsch has this discussion posted on his substack, you can fast forward to the 54 min mark when Dr. Kory joins if you want. It’s almost a 2 hour video.
Was Alex still a punk when he was debating Dr. Kory? I'd never try to take on big pharma doctors on anatomical/chemical debates lol, I can dunk on them with stats & studies but we need people of the same level to debate it.
"Covid-19 as a pure mutated virus has never been isolated" I see comments with this .......? on occasion, accross the internet which I visit. To my understanding such statements sow confusion for some.
sars-cov-2 is the virus that causes covid. This virus, in all its varients, has been "isolated" from the beginning at many labs across all the world.
This has definitely become a topic of big contention. Do viruses exist or not? Is covid a virus at all? Was it just the spike protein bioweapon built off the coronavirus platform?
Steve Kirsh and a group of researchers are having a really heated debate about this right now. It is something I am following along with…… the discussion has gone as far as debunking attempts at Louie Pasteur, dispelling Koch’s Postulates as bunk science, and where this all lands is anyones best guess! I keep reading both sides of the argument, trying to learn the anti virus illness position.
Did Luc Montagnier etc not "isolate" the samples from actual people, when he claimed it's lab originated, against the narrative in 2020? Because a lot of the lab origin scientists also became anti-gene therapy in 2021
If they all only got info from the the Wuhan lab sequence to study with, maybe it's never been isolated, I just find it hard to believe all these scientists have not studied from actual human samples? It's funny to watch govts responding FOIA saying they've never isolated it though.
On the theme of "reading both sides of the argument" I keep subscribing to feeds from jama and the nejm. I once found something of value.
There is always that 1% of the time they get it right, right? 🙌🏻
"There is always that 1% of the time they get it right, right?" Yes - but in their own way.
The case in point I was referring to was the study published in the nejm. It is titled "Therapeutic anticoagulation with heparin in critically ill patients with Covid-19" published aug 2021.
The supplementary data shows 23 pages of institutions and researchers participating , an armada of big research.
All that to show that when a treatment is started too late it does not work. "In critically ill patients with Covid-19, an initial strategy of therapeutic-dose anticoagulation with heparin did not result in a greater probability of survival to hospital discharge"
The clear covid truth is that from april 2020 practical treatment protocols to prevent covid clotting - from early treatment prevention of the need for anticoagulation, to timely initiation of anticoagulation in the outpatient setting, to asap initiation of anticoagulation and treatment for inflammation upon admittance to the hospital - was known, in practice, demonstrated safe and effective, with low cost and world wide availably.
FEW DIE FROM COVID - MANY TORTURED AND MURDERED - BY FAILURE TO TREAT.
All this with a group of clinicians that could be listed on one page.
(the singapore protocol, with the clotting work done by the Italians, the FLCCC group in the US, with Dr Darrell DeMello's treatment protocol in India, and with the clinical knowledge developed by REAL DOCTORS WHO ACTUALLY TREATED COVID PATIENTS here and there all over the world).
The ONLY THING "they" (big medical published in nejm) got right was this comment "Despite demonstrable activation of coagulation in multiple organ systems in patients with severe Covid-19, it is possible that initiation of therapeutic-dose anticoagulation after severe Covid-19 has developed may be too late to alter the consequences of established disease processes.
YEP. Kind of like the ivermectin studies where they stated it did not work at all, but they waited until day 10-14 and gave sub-therapeutic doses. The trial was designed to fail, and inaccurately portrayed ivermectin as a worthless zero in the treatment of covid. Dr. Pierre Kory did a round-table with Steve Kirsh and Alex Berenson this last week and he perfectly stated the corruption of these medical journals and their stance on evidence based treatment, calling it bunk. I agree with him. Evidence based practice and clinical based journals are not quality any longer. I call them out in several posts on here. Steve Kirsch has this discussion posted on his substack, you can fast forward to the 54 min mark when Dr. Kory joins if you want. It’s almost a 2 hour video.
Was Alex still a punk when he was debating Dr. Kory? I'd never try to take on big pharma doctors on anatomical/chemical debates lol, I can dunk on them with stats & studies but we need people of the same level to debate it.
"Covid-19 as a pure mutated virus has never been isolated" I see comments with this .......? on occasion, accross the internet which I visit. To my understanding such statements sow confusion for some.
sars-cov-2 is the virus that causes covid. This virus, in all its varients, has been "isolated" from the beginning at many labs across all the world.
This has definitely become a topic of big contention. Do viruses exist or not? Is covid a virus at all? Was it just the spike protein bioweapon built off the coronavirus platform?
Steve Kirsh and a group of researchers are having a really heated debate about this right now. It is something I am following along with…… the discussion has gone as far as debunking attempts at Louie Pasteur, dispelling Koch’s Postulates as bunk science, and where this all lands is anyones best guess! I keep reading both sides of the argument, trying to learn the anti virus illness position.
Did Luc Montagnier etc not "isolate" the samples from actual people, when he claimed it's lab originated, against the narrative in 2020? Because a lot of the lab origin scientists also became anti-gene therapy in 2021
If they all only got info from the the Wuhan lab sequence to study with, maybe it's never been isolated, I just find it hard to believe all these scientists have not studied from actual human samples? It's funny to watch govts responding FOIA saying they've never isolated it though.