Part 2: The 1970’s plan to “destroy the nuclear family”: the CIA, Planned Parenthood, Rockefellers, and the US CIA, Military, and the World Bank

https://thuletide.wordpress.com/2021/06/11/the-intentional-destruction-of-white-birth-rates-leaked-reports-from-planned-parenthood-the-rockefeller-foundation-world-bank-us-nsc-incl-cia-military-etc/

Today is the Kissinger report: https://archive.vn/YVb7Q 

Pay special notice to pages 74-84 as they are the US Security interests for Population Strategy.  From 1974.  So what did they have up THEIR sleeve?!

The Kissinger/US Government report wanted to look at how to ramp up fertility decline.  They focused on things to affect fertility, laws respective to age of marriage and financial incentives.  Encourage a small family.  Access to INCOME was the angle they play.  Employment leads to improved education, health, and REDUCED family size.  Reliable jobs = parents limit their family size to focus on the kids they have in the limited time they have with them. They even looked at creating “son insurance” to be given to parents if they had no more than 3 children, and also looked at deferring retirement benefits for elderly.  They again encourage that girls need beyond a 4th grade education to reduce family size.  Higher incomes = less children.  We needed to distribute income more equally across the entire population to lower the overall fertility rate because “better income distribution means that the poor, who have the highest fertility, have higher income”.  (I am guessing they hoped giving them more money would make them have less children?)

This is where it gets scary.  Family planning supply should be reinforced.  More “field testing” of the options available.  With contraception and reduced fertility, they focused on oral contraception, IUD’s, permanent sterilization of males and females via vasectomies and tubal ligations. They even began to brainstorm the injectable contraceptives (depo-provera that we have today), and have private FAMILY PLANNING ASSOCIATIONS (Planned Parenthood) to make accessibility easy.  They offered easy to get over the counter options like condoms and spermicide foam.   I remember way back when I did my pediatric rotations, I had a period of time where I was at the Children’s Mercy teen clinic over off Emmanuel Cleaver BLVD here in Kansas City.  These are girls and boys age 12-18, in the urban core.  This is a poor economic area.  EVERY SINGLE FEMALE PATIENT was on depo-provera.  The crew I worked with was even willing to go to the girls home to make sure she got her injection every 3 months if she missed an appt at the clinic.  They were effectively temporarily sterilizing all of these girls and ensuring they did not have a baby.  I will never forget one of the employees telling me “I would stand out on the corner of Cleaver Blvd and depo every females arm at the stoplight if I have to”.  Remembering that makes me sick.  They made sure the depo shot was free, and they promoted it heavily to ensure every girl over there had that shot ever 3 months. What are the long term implications of depo-provera? Many women struggle with infertility after being on that shot long term. What else does it do? It is notorious for causing depression and mood symptoms. “Gateway drug” to get that depo-shot person into a mental health clinic when they develop mental health issues FROM the depo shot? Now we see a surge in young girls with Implanon, the plastic rods implanted into their arm, that provide 3-5 years of birth control. What are the long term effects of that?! We do not know yet. Or what about the new smaller IUD’s they are putting into anyone who gives consent? That is another 5 year birth control option. They sell it as “set it and forget it”. What does 5 years of an IUD in your uterus truly do to your uterus?! No studies that I can find to discuss the long term implications of THAT. Especially in nulliparous women, or women who have never had a baby, and want to have one in the future.

By reducing the prescription necessity of some birth control, they were able to have the corner drug store provide birth control to those they missed in the medical establishments.  

There was concern in this document that the ONLY NATO countries who did NOT have a plan and policy to reduce population growth was France and Greece.  They are concerned that they were not taking it seriously enough.  Shortly after, France had a vote that approved availability of contraceptives and that their social security system would pay for it!  They were proud of Germany, because in 1974 the death rates far exceeded the birth rates, and they had a “natural” negative growth rate.  Other countries had policies to INCREASE their population rates.  Romania, Hungary, Bulgaria, and Czechoslovakia. Conversely, in the USSR, fertility rates were lower than replacement level so deaths outnumbered births and also had “natural population decline”.  Ukraine, Latvia, and Estonia all fell below replacement level.  

Does this clarify further what the covid “vaccine” was all about?  Does anyone believe the massive excess mortality was an accident?  It certainly was not.  The covid “shot” poison was designed to do what these papers discussed 50 years ago: reduce fertility, and increase the rate of death so that together, they reduce the population. We could get to the point where deaths far exceed births and the population dwindles quickly.