Thank you! Sasha and Katherine are amazing truth-telling warriors. They have and continue to make a difference in our fight against the criminals. I recall watching Dr. David Martin's testimony to Reimer Fullmich a long time ago - I watched it again a week or so ago; every word he says is true.
It was in the works for over a decade. Vera Sherav's documentary at CHD.TV is required viewing - the covid fraud is run by people with the same mindset.
I have not watched Sherav yet……adding that to my list! Thank you!!!
Yes that David Martin piece is spot on, isn’t it! Little did I know back in 2020 when I first discovered David Martin what rabbit trails he would uncover and discuss.
Ms. Sellick's article starts with "Perhaps the biggest existential question of our times is where exactly did covid-19 come from?" Existential is overused and not necessary. I've debated in my own writings whether or not to even bother with the topic when presenting to legislative committees. There are two reasons to care and to follow up, even at the state and local levels at least with education and "true history". The first is: Was the government lying? Our government? The Chinese government? In either or both cases, if governments were involved in lying, then local laws will be needed to (1) protect our citizens from government lying by establishing the proper reviews and then (2) to define responses when either government can be proven, to the standard of "sufficiency of evidence", to have lied. This is just the lying part, not what they were lying about. The second is: If either government can be show, by the standard of "preponderance of evidence" to have been responsible, at least in part, for the SARS-CoV-2 virus, then local laws will be needed to punish, to the extent possible, both as a separate government entity and as a coalition of entities, the governments responsible. The challenge will be if the US government is "convicted" of participating. One would first say, punish the individuals responsible. But, if these succession of laws and policies is true, then our government and society is responsible as a whole. What do the citizens of a democratic society, or at least a democratic republic do when your own national government is responsible for crimes against humanity. In the US, the states must- MUST- work through what will be done. I argue that these actions must- MUST- be thought through and implemented now, regardless of the outcome of our local investigation of (1) government lying and (2) government involvement in making a bioweapon.
The wording used in the dozen or so videos and articles written re: DOD involvement, legal standing of the manufacturing process liability, the source of SARS-CoV-2, and the vaccine as a "poison" needs to be refined to make it believable. I am not saying it all doesn't amount to a conspiracy, but I am saying that Jewish debate style to present the information instead of the aggressive "Christian" style debate style will be much more persuasive and negate the charge of being a conspiracy theorist. I'll illustrate by using Miranda Sellick's article as part of this: https://rumble.com/v27eu7e-dod-vaccines-press-conference-tues-january-24-trimmed.html. I guess I'll just add some examples as separate comments.
Paul Alexander has a summary of this work on his substack: https://palexander.substack.com/p/why-will-the-fda-not-withdraw-the. Thanks for your addition. Paul's work got me digging into this and it's a mess. The patience/persistence to follow the strings is remarkable. It's like crooks hiding their enterprise behind several layers of front companies. I may have some comments later, but my main work will be with my state's Attorney General. I have a meeting with him in the near future. I need to both get this work down to a single paragraph and make enough of an impression that it will become a basis of research for his office to hold those accountable, regardless of the complexity. Whether this goes further at the national level will depend to a significant extent on the work being done here. I will say that our own state laws are worded in a fuzzy way that could make our state health agency unaccountable. However, we are using the agency's words against them to show dereliction of duty at the personal level, given the stated mission, in the health agency's own words, as well as the job descriptions of the administrators.
Thank you! Sasha and Katherine are amazing truth-telling warriors. They have and continue to make a difference in our fight against the criminals. I recall watching Dr. David Martin's testimony to Reimer Fullmich a long time ago - I watched it again a week or so ago; every word he says is true.
https://odysee.com/@bonniesmit:0/Dr.-David-E.-Martin-_-Sitzung-60-Die-Zeit-ist-kein-flacher-Kreis:a
It was in the works for over a decade. Vera Sherav's documentary at CHD.TV is required viewing - the covid fraud is run by people with the same mindset.
Peace.
I have not watched Sherav yet……adding that to my list! Thank you!!!
Yes that David Martin piece is spot on, isn’t it! Little did I know back in 2020 when I first discovered David Martin what rabbit trails he would uncover and discuss.
I agree. David Martin documented the entire thing. Anyone can download it. It's also a Kindle book - "The Fauci Dossier". Peace.
Left out of this great analysis is the who did it and why? This is how it went down.
That is coming tomorrow. ❤️
I am limited in how long a post can be. This one is spread out over 3 days!
Ms. Sellick's article starts with "Perhaps the biggest existential question of our times is where exactly did covid-19 come from?" Existential is overused and not necessary. I've debated in my own writings whether or not to even bother with the topic when presenting to legislative committees. There are two reasons to care and to follow up, even at the state and local levels at least with education and "true history". The first is: Was the government lying? Our government? The Chinese government? In either or both cases, if governments were involved in lying, then local laws will be needed to (1) protect our citizens from government lying by establishing the proper reviews and then (2) to define responses when either government can be proven, to the standard of "sufficiency of evidence", to have lied. This is just the lying part, not what they were lying about. The second is: If either government can be show, by the standard of "preponderance of evidence" to have been responsible, at least in part, for the SARS-CoV-2 virus, then local laws will be needed to punish, to the extent possible, both as a separate government entity and as a coalition of entities, the governments responsible. The challenge will be if the US government is "convicted" of participating. One would first say, punish the individuals responsible. But, if these succession of laws and policies is true, then our government and society is responsible as a whole. What do the citizens of a democratic society, or at least a democratic republic do when your own national government is responsible for crimes against humanity. In the US, the states must- MUST- work through what will be done. I argue that these actions must- MUST- be thought through and implemented now, regardless of the outcome of our local investigation of (1) government lying and (2) government involvement in making a bioweapon.
The wording used in the dozen or so videos and articles written re: DOD involvement, legal standing of the manufacturing process liability, the source of SARS-CoV-2, and the vaccine as a "poison" needs to be refined to make it believable. I am not saying it all doesn't amount to a conspiracy, but I am saying that Jewish debate style to present the information instead of the aggressive "Christian" style debate style will be much more persuasive and negate the charge of being a conspiracy theorist. I'll illustrate by using Miranda Sellick's article as part of this: https://rumble.com/v27eu7e-dod-vaccines-press-conference-tues-january-24-trimmed.html. I guess I'll just add some examples as separate comments.
Paul Alexander has a summary of this work on his substack: https://palexander.substack.com/p/why-will-the-fda-not-withdraw-the. Thanks for your addition. Paul's work got me digging into this and it's a mess. The patience/persistence to follow the strings is remarkable. It's like crooks hiding their enterprise behind several layers of front companies. I may have some comments later, but my main work will be with my state's Attorney General. I have a meeting with him in the near future. I need to both get this work down to a single paragraph and make enough of an impression that it will become a basis of research for his office to hold those accountable, regardless of the complexity. Whether this goes further at the national level will depend to a significant extent on the work being done here. I will say that our own state laws are worded in a fuzzy way that could make our state health agency unaccountable. However, we are using the agency's words against them to show dereliction of duty at the personal level, given the stated mission, in the health agency's own words, as well as the job descriptions of the administrators.
https://rairfoundation.com/pharmaceutical-whistleblower-covid-and-the-toxic-vaccines-are-bio-weapons-created-by-u-s-department-of-defense-video/
Thank you Jennifer. You are another of the leading lights in Truth revealing. Thank you for all of your posts.
Good summary. Look forward to the same foe Katherine.