They are also putting Covid positive organs into recipients. This is how they are trying to force recipients to get jabbed. The Covid positive organs have now joined the assumed risk group a patient can choose to accept. Other assumed risk categories include organs possibly infected with HIV, hepatitis b, and hepatitis c.
"'Covid' positive organs"? Someone who's had this infection and recovered? After recovery someone now has "Covid positive organs"?
Or someone who's gotten this junk injection, which instructs the cells to make and then spread the pathogen (the spike protein "they" tell us is the defining feature of this pathogen) now has "Covid positive organs"?
I would definitely not trust an organ from a covid injected person. Or their blood. Any of it. Which is so sad for people who have sat on a donor waiting list for years for a liver, heart, kidney, etc and then they have to decide if its worth the risk! ESP livers and kidneys. We know the injection loves to collect in those 2 organs. So sickening!!!
I agree. I was trying to confirm what your other commenter meant when she said "Covid positive organ". If someone has gotten the respiratory infection called "COV!D-19" and beat it naturally, do we need to be concerned about this person's organs?
OTOH, I am with you 100% on the organs or blood of 𝒂𝒏𝒚 "COV!D" injected person -- mRNA or otherwise.
Almost lost my wife to covid, and she was only saved due to convalescent plasma. I donated weekly thereafter (since I have natural immunity) for 6 months... until they stopped collecting.
No way I am putting or risking putting that "vaccine" in my body by chance or on purpose without assurances of zero risk!
I hope and pray that we will soon have a way to suss out vaccinated versus unvaccinated databases for blood product and organ transplant data. As an unvaccinated person, I would rather my organs go to someone not vaccinated because I know how hard they fought to stay unvaccinated, and that choice cost some their ability to get a transplant! I would want mine to go to someone who fought for their autonomy and body choice!!!!
What a generous and giving person you are with the donating you did. If I had one wish and prayer it would be to find you an unvaccinated cornea donor my friend. You more than deserve it as the faithful servant you have been to so many people donating plasma!!! There has to be a way here for this to happen safely for you. I have had many long discussions with my husband that I do not want any blood products if something happens to me. I realize it may end badly for me, but I cannot fathom what life would be like with vaccine products inside my body and I don’t know if that is the life I would want to live if I had complications from the newly infused mRNA spike protein factory going into me. What a tragedy that we even have to consider these things!!!
Praying for you and your wife on this journey!!! If I can be of any help or you have questions or just need to vent a frustration about all this, feel free to email me anytime. Docbrown77@protonmail.com
Hopefully someday sooner than later we can find you a safe option for transplant!
1. Still no unvaccinated cornea here, but symptoms are manageable and my vision is back to 20/20 (when i use the drops). Still praying for a donor.
2. Saw a story on Fox yesterday of a 14yo girl being denied a kidney at Duke because she refuses the jab! Please amplify her need for a hospital to help her.
3. I read your article on ICON earlier this week. I 100% agree they are complicit with big pharma (as are IQVIA, PPD and others), but please be careful not to implicate the entire CRO industry. I actually run a small CRO with high integrity and per good clinical practice (GCP). We have actually lost business due to delivering clients with the "hard truth" that their product(s) did NOT achieve desired outcomes.
The challenge with the overall industry is that FDA/Pharma/CDC/NIH/CROs are colluding to bring certain products to market and ignoring the rules, regulations and processes (e.g., animal studies followed by phase 1, 2, etc)
as well as legal obligations to provide people informed consent and disclose all data) to meet their maniacal goals.
It is NOT ok!
Clinical research has been weaponized for political gain and to drive vaccine compliance; or other political gain.
Just like our legal system, it has resulted in a two tier system -- one that is legitimate and one that is not; and shakes everyone's confidence.
God bless you for your continued voice. Please be careful to acknowledge and support those who do follow the rules, (and demand it of all professionals) and give confidence in legitimate societal infrastructure on which we founded this country. The bad actors win when we say the whole system is broken.
Per prior notes, I have elected to delay corneal transplant until an unvaccinated donor is found. Met with ophthalmologist yesterday and he first noted that an unvaxxed donor may never be found. Then assured me the endothelial layer of a cornea would not contain mRNA from donor... That does not seem logical to me. Does his claim make sense?
I was wondering how this all worked out for you friend…….I cannot say I blame you. If I were in your shoes, I would have delayed as well. Just for personal peace of mind and safety first. I would say there is no way he could guarantee that mRNA did not remain in the endothelial layer. There are zero studies to say if it does or does not! He also seemed pretty quick to retort back that “an unvaxxed donor may never be found”. Wow. Talk about soft coercion there. “Here take these corneas that I have zero studies to guarantee no mRNA exists in them because well shoot there may NEVER be an unvaxxed donor”! Feels about as gross as the trash they said to convince people to GET vaccinated!
I am proud of you for standing your ground here. His answers do not make me feel very confident and should reassure you that you made the right decision here my friend.
Wondering if you have seen any additional data on mRNA gene therapy on corneal transplants since the study out of Japan.
I never heard back from my MD or the eye bank here in Denver about availability to a non-jabbed donor (guess I shouldn't be surprised).
It appears clear the mRNA is transferred through bodily fluid. So I presume if it is in a harvested organ, one would expect it to be systemic and/or replicate in the recipient's body.
I agree with your stance my friend. Sadly, there is zero new data out refuting that this could happen. So we have to assume that yes, the MRNA could be in anything in the human body, and putting that into the unvaxxinated body could lead to replication and issues down the road. The solid organ transplant information indicates this is happening, but most transplant recipients are already vaccinated so we can never confirm it. I suspect that is why they required vaccines for transplant. I wouldn’t run the risk of this yet if I were in your shoes. 😢
I am hopeful a non-vaccinated option would come available for you!
It is totally a valid concern……I wish I had a solid answer about it not being able to replicate once inside you. I so wish I had a better answer for you my friend…….😢
Am scheduled for cornea transplant next week and the eye bank can only confirm the donor cornea was not vaccinated in the past 12 months... Donor might be unvaccinated or maybe just not in the past year -- How does somebody assess the risk? I don't want to put mRNA in my body, or risk the failure...
OK if you go back to my April 11th post, there is a table of the organs that the mRNA was traveling to. It does have eyes listed but not cornea specific. The mRNA in the trial rats is only through 48 hours. Eyes definitely had very very low concentration in them, the highest it got was 0.1% at the 48 hour mark. Solid organs definitely appear to be a much higher risk, and if this donor had not been vaccinated in 12 months, there is a decent likelihood they did not get the first 2, but not a guarantee. Solid organs I would trust zero, but cornea, as long as you do not vaccinate (which I know you won’t), I think you have great odds of a successful long term transplant. Just my 2 cents and obviously nothing is guaranteed, but corneal transplant is usually very successful. I will be praying for you next week my friend!
Ohhhhhhh my friend. Me, 8 years ago, would have been jumping up and down congratulating you on getting transplant approved! Me, now, has the same concerns you do. I will say, the corneas have not been an area where the mRNA has congregated to. Solid organs have taken the brunt of the mRNA vaccine. So cornea’s are low risk. It appears the corneal rejections were due to people who got vaccinated POST corneal transplant, not rejection due to the previous donor possibly being vaccinated. While I cannot 100% guarantee anything because of course the long term studies do not exist, as long as you stay away from vaccinating post corneal transplant, you should be good. I am going back to the pfizer data to look at organ spread and will post a second reply if I find anything that conflicts. ❤️
And so shattering for those hopefuls waiting on a viable organ.
I wonder, in a jabbed:jabbed donation what the risk factors are? Time since last dose before donation? Before receiving the transplant? Mixing and matching the various bioweapons? Will a Murderna donor's organ interact with a Fizer recipient's body? Or J&J/AZ, given their different mechanism?
How did they not test for these risks? Organs? Blood? Breast milk? Shedding? Admittedly, the vaxx manufacturers have just been leaving blank entire sections of the various forms where the questions were about the mutagenic, genotoxic aspects. So missing it from the miracle jabs under the Warped Fear campaign isn't unprecedented (the normalisation of which was already a travesty). But these aren't normal jabs. They are a gene therapy, with whole other layers of risk, as evidenced by all the 'conspiracy theories' about what it would do, coming true.
Someone should have asked the question, and halted progress until there was an answer. They went after Ivermectin with every bullet in their arsenal, for something safer than Aspirin. Yet they express-slipped this weapon through every gate and compelled it into most arms.
The blood supply now has to be considered to be compromised. The ripples from that alone will be horrific. How many people, transfused during surgery, will die shortly after? It has already started. Red Cross has already made it clear they don't differentiate. Hard to believe, given how dramatically different jabbed blood can look.
And now, organ donation. Waiting lists are going to explode like a soccer players' heart.
I wonder, this destruction, whether it might be the forcing function to approve artificial blood and organs for transfusion/transplant? In the same way the fear campaign forced through the MRNA bioweapons. I don't know where the biotech is at developmentally, but given the unquenchable demand for organs it must have been getting significant R&D focus. We know TPTB want to live for as long as (in)humanely possible. Testing in the masses may be part of their longevity plan. To work out the issues.
Might be worth checking Bill's investments, beyond farming and BioNTech.
It is hard to see what the endstate is going to look like, though each new report casts a greater shadow over it. The world we knew up until late 2019 really is over, and we can't get back to it. The damage has mostly been done.
I do know that the endstate for Murderna and Fizer needs to be no less than a smoking crater*. Leaving either to continue their genocidal antics would be insanity, now that we've seen their true face.
*-Figuratively, of course. Personally, I like the imagery of 1000 lawyers-as-piranhas devouring Bancel and Bourla until their companies couldn't afford an Uber.
I absolutely agree. I spent 5 years working in transplant ICU. We did liver/kidney/pancreas transplants. I worry about what transplant looks like now, because not only what damage has been done to a vaccinated donor organ going into someone, but the effects of the organ in a vaccinated body while on immunosuppressants to prevent rejection. That is a scary scary thought!!!
I wrote an upcoming post about breastmilk that will be up next week. The answer is yes, mRNA was found in breastmilk. And we now know that blood donation does not screen for vaccination so your best bet there is if you have elective surgery, donate your own blood before surgery so if you need it, they can use your own. Donate 30 days before surgery and bank your own blood. Scary times we are living in!!!!!!! They are willfully ignoring the dangers at this point. This is criminal.
It's difficult to even know what to say to this -- except that despite all the marketing to the contrary, the world has more stupid people in it than even I thought possible. And a good number of those have very fancy degrees and lots of letters after their names.
Thank you for your continued support and advice! Staying the course with drops for now and praying the corneal regeneration studies and products come through soon
They are also putting Covid positive organs into recipients. This is how they are trying to force recipients to get jabbed. The Covid positive organs have now joined the assumed risk group a patient can choose to accept. Other assumed risk categories include organs possibly infected with HIV, hepatitis b, and hepatitis c.
"'Covid' positive organs"? Someone who's had this infection and recovered? After recovery someone now has "Covid positive organs"?
Or someone who's gotten this junk injection, which instructs the cells to make and then spread the pathogen (the spike protein "they" tell us is the defining feature of this pathogen) now has "Covid positive organs"?
I would definitely not trust an organ from a covid injected person. Or their blood. Any of it. Which is so sad for people who have sat on a donor waiting list for years for a liver, heart, kidney, etc and then they have to decide if its worth the risk! ESP livers and kidneys. We know the injection loves to collect in those 2 organs. So sickening!!!
I agree. I was trying to confirm what your other commenter meant when she said "Covid positive organ". If someone has gotten the respiratory infection called "COV!D-19" and beat it naturally, do we need to be concerned about this person's organs?
OTOH, I am with you 100% on the organs or blood of 𝒂𝒏𝒚 "COV!D" injected person -- mRNA or otherwise.
same with blood transfusions.
Thanks for your continued support!
Almost lost my wife to covid, and she was only saved due to convalescent plasma. I donated weekly thereafter (since I have natural immunity) for 6 months... until they stopped collecting.
No way I am putting or risking putting that "vaccine" in my body by chance or on purpose without assurances of zero risk!
Thank you again!
I hope and pray that we will soon have a way to suss out vaccinated versus unvaccinated databases for blood product and organ transplant data. As an unvaccinated person, I would rather my organs go to someone not vaccinated because I know how hard they fought to stay unvaccinated, and that choice cost some their ability to get a transplant! I would want mine to go to someone who fought for their autonomy and body choice!!!!
What a generous and giving person you are with the donating you did. If I had one wish and prayer it would be to find you an unvaccinated cornea donor my friend. You more than deserve it as the faithful servant you have been to so many people donating plasma!!! There has to be a way here for this to happen safely for you. I have had many long discussions with my husband that I do not want any blood products if something happens to me. I realize it may end badly for me, but I cannot fathom what life would be like with vaccine products inside my body and I don’t know if that is the life I would want to live if I had complications from the newly infused mRNA spike protein factory going into me. What a tragedy that we even have to consider these things!!!
Praying for you and your wife on this journey!!! If I can be of any help or you have questions or just need to vent a frustration about all this, feel free to email me anytime. Docbrown77@protonmail.com
Hopefully someday sooner than later we can find you a safe option for transplant!
Dr. Brown,
1. Still no unvaccinated cornea here, but symptoms are manageable and my vision is back to 20/20 (when i use the drops). Still praying for a donor.
2. Saw a story on Fox yesterday of a 14yo girl being denied a kidney at Duke because she refuses the jab! Please amplify her need for a hospital to help her.
3. I read your article on ICON earlier this week. I 100% agree they are complicit with big pharma (as are IQVIA, PPD and others), but please be careful not to implicate the entire CRO industry. I actually run a small CRO with high integrity and per good clinical practice (GCP). We have actually lost business due to delivering clients with the "hard truth" that their product(s) did NOT achieve desired outcomes.
The challenge with the overall industry is that FDA/Pharma/CDC/NIH/CROs are colluding to bring certain products to market and ignoring the rules, regulations and processes (e.g., animal studies followed by phase 1, 2, etc)
as well as legal obligations to provide people informed consent and disclose all data) to meet their maniacal goals.
It is NOT ok!
Clinical research has been weaponized for political gain and to drive vaccine compliance; or other political gain.
Just like our legal system, it has resulted in a two tier system -- one that is legitimate and one that is not; and shakes everyone's confidence.
God bless you for your continued voice. Please be careful to acknowledge and support those who do follow the rules, (and demand it of all professionals) and give confidence in legitimate societal infrastructure on which we founded this country. The bad actors win when we say the whole system is broken.
Merry Christmas!
Jennifer,
Per prior notes, I have elected to delay corneal transplant until an unvaccinated donor is found. Met with ophthalmologist yesterday and he first noted that an unvaxxed donor may never be found. Then assured me the endothelial layer of a cornea would not contain mRNA from donor... That does not seem logical to me. Does his claim make sense?
I was wondering how this all worked out for you friend…….I cannot say I blame you. If I were in your shoes, I would have delayed as well. Just for personal peace of mind and safety first. I would say there is no way he could guarantee that mRNA did not remain in the endothelial layer. There are zero studies to say if it does or does not! He also seemed pretty quick to retort back that “an unvaxxed donor may never be found”. Wow. Talk about soft coercion there. “Here take these corneas that I have zero studies to guarantee no mRNA exists in them because well shoot there may NEVER be an unvaxxed donor”! Feels about as gross as the trash they said to convince people to GET vaccinated!
I am proud of you for standing your ground here. His answers do not make me feel very confident and should reassure you that you made the right decision here my friend.
Hi Dr Brown,
Wondering if you have seen any additional data on mRNA gene therapy on corneal transplants since the study out of Japan.
I never heard back from my MD or the eye bank here in Denver about availability to a non-jabbed donor (guess I shouldn't be surprised).
It appears clear the mRNA is transferred through bodily fluid. So I presume if it is in a harvested organ, one would expect it to be systemic and/or replicate in the recipient's body.
Appreciate any recent thoughts.
God bless
Hey friend!!!
I agree with your stance my friend. Sadly, there is zero new data out refuting that this could happen. So we have to assume that yes, the MRNA could be in anything in the human body, and putting that into the unvaxxinated body could lead to replication and issues down the road. The solid organ transplant information indicates this is happening, but most transplant recipients are already vaccinated so we can never confirm it. I suspect that is why they required vaccines for transplant. I wouldn’t run the risk of this yet if I were in your shoes. 😢
I am hopeful a non-vaccinated option would come available for you!
Thanks so much for the reply and research.
My broader concern is is I get a cornea with mRNA in it, does it replicate systemically?
It is totally a valid concern……I wish I had a solid answer about it not being able to replicate once inside you. I so wish I had a better answer for you my friend…….😢
Am scheduled for cornea transplant next week and the eye bank can only confirm the donor cornea was not vaccinated in the past 12 months... Donor might be unvaccinated or maybe just not in the past year -- How does somebody assess the risk? I don't want to put mRNA in my body, or risk the failure...
OK if you go back to my April 11th post, there is a table of the organs that the mRNA was traveling to. It does have eyes listed but not cornea specific. The mRNA in the trial rats is only through 48 hours. Eyes definitely had very very low concentration in them, the highest it got was 0.1% at the 48 hour mark. Solid organs definitely appear to be a much higher risk, and if this donor had not been vaccinated in 12 months, there is a decent likelihood they did not get the first 2, but not a guarantee. Solid organs I would trust zero, but cornea, as long as you do not vaccinate (which I know you won’t), I think you have great odds of a successful long term transplant. Just my 2 cents and obviously nothing is guaranteed, but corneal transplant is usually very successful. I will be praying for you next week my friend!
Ohhhhhhh my friend. Me, 8 years ago, would have been jumping up and down congratulating you on getting transplant approved! Me, now, has the same concerns you do. I will say, the corneas have not been an area where the mRNA has congregated to. Solid organs have taken the brunt of the mRNA vaccine. So cornea’s are low risk. It appears the corneal rejections were due to people who got vaccinated POST corneal transplant, not rejection due to the previous donor possibly being vaccinated. While I cannot 100% guarantee anything because of course the long term studies do not exist, as long as you stay away from vaccinating post corneal transplant, you should be good. I am going back to the pfizer data to look at organ spread and will post a second reply if I find anything that conflicts. ❤️
So sad for these individuals.
And so shattering for those hopefuls waiting on a viable organ.
I wonder, in a jabbed:jabbed donation what the risk factors are? Time since last dose before donation? Before receiving the transplant? Mixing and matching the various bioweapons? Will a Murderna donor's organ interact with a Fizer recipient's body? Or J&J/AZ, given their different mechanism?
How did they not test for these risks? Organs? Blood? Breast milk? Shedding? Admittedly, the vaxx manufacturers have just been leaving blank entire sections of the various forms where the questions were about the mutagenic, genotoxic aspects. So missing it from the miracle jabs under the Warped Fear campaign isn't unprecedented (the normalisation of which was already a travesty). But these aren't normal jabs. They are a gene therapy, with whole other layers of risk, as evidenced by all the 'conspiracy theories' about what it would do, coming true.
Someone should have asked the question, and halted progress until there was an answer. They went after Ivermectin with every bullet in their arsenal, for something safer than Aspirin. Yet they express-slipped this weapon through every gate and compelled it into most arms.
The blood supply now has to be considered to be compromised. The ripples from that alone will be horrific. How many people, transfused during surgery, will die shortly after? It has already started. Red Cross has already made it clear they don't differentiate. Hard to believe, given how dramatically different jabbed blood can look.
And now, organ donation. Waiting lists are going to explode like a soccer players' heart.
I wonder, this destruction, whether it might be the forcing function to approve artificial blood and organs for transfusion/transplant? In the same way the fear campaign forced through the MRNA bioweapons. I don't know where the biotech is at developmentally, but given the unquenchable demand for organs it must have been getting significant R&D focus. We know TPTB want to live for as long as (in)humanely possible. Testing in the masses may be part of their longevity plan. To work out the issues.
Might be worth checking Bill's investments, beyond farming and BioNTech.
It is hard to see what the endstate is going to look like, though each new report casts a greater shadow over it. The world we knew up until late 2019 really is over, and we can't get back to it. The damage has mostly been done.
I do know that the endstate for Murderna and Fizer needs to be no less than a smoking crater*. Leaving either to continue their genocidal antics would be insanity, now that we've seen their true face.
*-Figuratively, of course. Personally, I like the imagery of 1000 lawyers-as-piranhas devouring Bancel and Bourla until their companies couldn't afford an Uber.
I absolutely agree. I spent 5 years working in transplant ICU. We did liver/kidney/pancreas transplants. I worry about what transplant looks like now, because not only what damage has been done to a vaccinated donor organ going into someone, but the effects of the organ in a vaccinated body while on immunosuppressants to prevent rejection. That is a scary scary thought!!!
I wrote an upcoming post about breastmilk that will be up next week. The answer is yes, mRNA was found in breastmilk. And we now know that blood donation does not screen for vaccination so your best bet there is if you have elective surgery, donate your own blood before surgery so if you need it, they can use your own. Donate 30 days before surgery and bank your own blood. Scary times we are living in!!!!!!! They are willfully ignoring the dangers at this point. This is criminal.
It's difficult to even know what to say to this -- except that despite all the marketing to the contrary, the world has more stupid people in it than even I thought possible. And a good number of those have very fancy degrees and lots of letters after their names.
Thank you for your continued support and advice! Staying the course with drops for now and praying the corneal regeneration studies and products come through soon