https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/11/15/4500 This is heartbreaking. I spent 5 years of my career working in a critical care/ICU unit that was not only a Medical ICU but also a transplant ICU. Livers and kidneys primarily. We had several organ donors that donated corneas, and I did have a few patients who received cornea transplants during my time on the unit. Watching what someone has to go through before any kind of transplant, taking anti-rejection meds for the rest of their life, and constantly monitoring for rejection is an anxious and fearful existence. To have something injected into them that CAUSED an organ to reject is sickening.
They are also putting Covid positive organs into recipients. This is how they are trying to force recipients to get jabbed. The Covid positive organs have now joined the assumed risk group a patient can choose to accept. Other assumed risk categories include organs possibly infected with HIV, hepatitis b, and hepatitis c.
Almost lost my wife to covid, and she was only saved due to convalescent plasma. I donated weekly thereafter (since I have natural immunity) for 6 months... until they stopped collecting.
No way I am putting or risking putting that "vaccine" in my body by chance or on purpose without assurances of zero risk!
Per prior notes, I have elected to delay corneal transplant until an unvaccinated donor is found. Met with ophthalmologist yesterday and he first noted that an unvaxxed donor may never be found. Then assured me the endothelial layer of a cornea would not contain mRNA from donor... That does not seem logical to me. Does his claim make sense?
Am scheduled for cornea transplant next week and the eye bank can only confirm the donor cornea was not vaccinated in the past 12 months... Donor might be unvaccinated or maybe just not in the past year -- How does somebody assess the risk? I don't want to put mRNA in my body, or risk the failure...
And so shattering for those hopefuls waiting on a viable organ.
I wonder, in a jabbed:jabbed donation what the risk factors are? Time since last dose before donation? Before receiving the transplant? Mixing and matching the various bioweapons? Will a Murderna donor's organ interact with a Fizer recipient's body? Or J&J/AZ, given their different mechanism?
How did they not test for these risks? Organs? Blood? Breast milk? Shedding? Admittedly, the vaxx manufacturers have just been leaving blank entire sections of the various forms where the questions were about the mutagenic, genotoxic aspects. So missing it from the miracle jabs under the Warped Fear campaign isn't unprecedented (the normalisation of which was already a travesty). But these aren't normal jabs. They are a gene therapy, with whole other layers of risk, as evidenced by all the 'conspiracy theories' about what it would do, coming true.
Someone should have asked the question, and halted progress until there was an answer. They went after Ivermectin with every bullet in their arsenal, for something safer than Aspirin. Yet they express-slipped this weapon through every gate and compelled it into most arms.
The blood supply now has to be considered to be compromised. The ripples from that alone will be horrific. How many people, transfused during surgery, will die shortly after? It has already started. Red Cross has already made it clear they don't differentiate. Hard to believe, given how dramatically different jabbed blood can look.
And now, organ donation. Waiting lists are going to explode like a soccer players' heart.
I wonder, this destruction, whether it might be the forcing function to approve artificial blood and organs for transfusion/transplant? In the same way the fear campaign forced through the MRNA bioweapons. I don't know where the biotech is at developmentally, but given the unquenchable demand for organs it must have been getting significant R&D focus. We know TPTB want to live for as long as (in)humanely possible. Testing in the masses may be part of their longevity plan. To work out the issues.
Might be worth checking Bill's investments, beyond farming and BioNTech.
It is hard to see what the endstate is going to look like, though each new report casts a greater shadow over it. The world we knew up until late 2019 really is over, and we can't get back to it. The damage has mostly been done.
I do know that the endstate for Murderna and Fizer needs to be no less than a smoking crater*. Leaving either to continue their genocidal antics would be insanity, now that we've seen their true face.
*-Figuratively, of course. Personally, I like the imagery of 1000 lawyers-as-piranhas devouring Bancel and Bourla until their companies couldn't afford an Uber.
It's difficult to even know what to say to this -- except that despite all the marketing to the contrary, the world has more stupid people in it than even I thought possible. And a good number of those have very fancy degrees and lots of letters after their names.
Thank you for your continued support and advice! Staying the course with drops for now and praying the corneal regeneration studies and products come through soon
They are also putting Covid positive organs into recipients. This is how they are trying to force recipients to get jabbed. The Covid positive organs have now joined the assumed risk group a patient can choose to accept. Other assumed risk categories include organs possibly infected with HIV, hepatitis b, and hepatitis c.
same with blood transfusions.
Thanks for your continued support!
Almost lost my wife to covid, and she was only saved due to convalescent plasma. I donated weekly thereafter (since I have natural immunity) for 6 months... until they stopped collecting.
No way I am putting or risking putting that "vaccine" in my body by chance or on purpose without assurances of zero risk!
Thank you again!
Jennifer,
Per prior notes, I have elected to delay corneal transplant until an unvaccinated donor is found. Met with ophthalmologist yesterday and he first noted that an unvaxxed donor may never be found. Then assured me the endothelial layer of a cornea would not contain mRNA from donor... That does not seem logical to me. Does his claim make sense?
Thanks so much for the reply and research.
My broader concern is is I get a cornea with mRNA in it, does it replicate systemically?
Am scheduled for cornea transplant next week and the eye bank can only confirm the donor cornea was not vaccinated in the past 12 months... Donor might be unvaccinated or maybe just not in the past year -- How does somebody assess the risk? I don't want to put mRNA in my body, or risk the failure...
So sad for these individuals.
And so shattering for those hopefuls waiting on a viable organ.
I wonder, in a jabbed:jabbed donation what the risk factors are? Time since last dose before donation? Before receiving the transplant? Mixing and matching the various bioweapons? Will a Murderna donor's organ interact with a Fizer recipient's body? Or J&J/AZ, given their different mechanism?
How did they not test for these risks? Organs? Blood? Breast milk? Shedding? Admittedly, the vaxx manufacturers have just been leaving blank entire sections of the various forms where the questions were about the mutagenic, genotoxic aspects. So missing it from the miracle jabs under the Warped Fear campaign isn't unprecedented (the normalisation of which was already a travesty). But these aren't normal jabs. They are a gene therapy, with whole other layers of risk, as evidenced by all the 'conspiracy theories' about what it would do, coming true.
Someone should have asked the question, and halted progress until there was an answer. They went after Ivermectin with every bullet in their arsenal, for something safer than Aspirin. Yet they express-slipped this weapon through every gate and compelled it into most arms.
The blood supply now has to be considered to be compromised. The ripples from that alone will be horrific. How many people, transfused during surgery, will die shortly after? It has already started. Red Cross has already made it clear they don't differentiate. Hard to believe, given how dramatically different jabbed blood can look.
And now, organ donation. Waiting lists are going to explode like a soccer players' heart.
I wonder, this destruction, whether it might be the forcing function to approve artificial blood and organs for transfusion/transplant? In the same way the fear campaign forced through the MRNA bioweapons. I don't know where the biotech is at developmentally, but given the unquenchable demand for organs it must have been getting significant R&D focus. We know TPTB want to live for as long as (in)humanely possible. Testing in the masses may be part of their longevity plan. To work out the issues.
Might be worth checking Bill's investments, beyond farming and BioNTech.
It is hard to see what the endstate is going to look like, though each new report casts a greater shadow over it. The world we knew up until late 2019 really is over, and we can't get back to it. The damage has mostly been done.
I do know that the endstate for Murderna and Fizer needs to be no less than a smoking crater*. Leaving either to continue their genocidal antics would be insanity, now that we've seen their true face.
*-Figuratively, of course. Personally, I like the imagery of 1000 lawyers-as-piranhas devouring Bancel and Bourla until their companies couldn't afford an Uber.
It's difficult to even know what to say to this -- except that despite all the marketing to the contrary, the world has more stupid people in it than even I thought possible. And a good number of those have very fancy degrees and lots of letters after their names.
Thank you for your continued support and advice! Staying the course with drops for now and praying the corneal regeneration studies and products come through soon