7 Comments

I’m beside myself! In a good way!

Expand full comment

So glad to read in Russell's long article that he mentions the change of definition by WHO of a pandemic. Basically they removed the words on significant numbers of deaths to just whatever we want, then we'll call it a pandemic.

I think this was significant along with redefining herd immunity, vaccines, and others to further the agenda.

Another point I think he could strengthen is the outright tossing of 50 successful years of pandemic protocol for near universal adoption of masks, lockdowns, social distancing. All have been proven to be utterly useless at best and extremely destructive of life and society. The collateral damage far outweighs any real or perceived benefit.

Expand full comment

I agree. When we go back just a year or 18 months we can see where they changed the definition of everything to fit this narrative. There was never a pandemic. There was a bioweapon released and with the 40+ testing cycles (wish he hammered that harder as well), the fake asymptomatic spread…..everything was to see how compliant we would all be when they really decide to throttle our tracheas. Here in the US the gun control battle is heating up now, and they are about to find out compliance with covid will not translate to compliance with the second amendment.

Expand full comment

Brilliant and on point.

Has this been saved to the WayBack Machine?

Are you aware there's a repeat in the last paragraph of your piece?

Expand full comment

I was not aware there was a repeat…..thank you for letting me know! Wifi has been a little sketchy posting from vacation and my edits may not have worked quite right between word and substack. Appreciate the heads up!

Expand full comment

Wow!! A step in the right direction! They didn’t hold anything back either. Love it

Expand full comment

I totally agree!! This publication is HUGE!!! He Let er rip tater chip! 🙌🏻

Expand full comment