https://ago.mo.gov/wp-content/uploads/Noe-v.-Parson-trial-order.pdf
Ever since amendment 3 passed on November 5th, there was ambiguity as to whether or not the “family reproductive rights” bill was truly about abortion alone or transgender care. It was a loosely worded bill that had potential for other things to fall into the purview of the bill.
AG Andrew Bailey went to court to uphold an existing bill which prevented the mutilation of children. This is the court case linked above where the outgoing governor was sued, and AG Bailey won the case. Transgender care on minors has been cut off at the pass.
What an adult decides to do to their body at/after age 18 is their choice. Children need a voice to protect them.
Insurance and Medicare should not cover any of this. it should be considered cosmetic elective surgery and be fully funded by the recipient (every aspect of it). I’m sick and tired of seeing our company insurance premiums go up 10%+ a year and the deductible often increases $500 and the new added features are things like additional transgender care. You would end a lot of this nonsense if the people were responsible for funding it themselves.
Excellent news. Any politician that authorises the transition of children should be sacked and then sued until they scream.