I agree with you and Im about to sound super cynical here and Im essentially just talking it out but…. big pharma has LOTS of money to be made with amphetamines . TONS. While controls may amp up ( no pun intended) I dont see big pharma walking away from this particular cash cow. On a related note the push for legalized psilocybins ( al…
I agree with you and Im about to sound super cynical here and Im essentially just talking it out but…. big pharma has LOTS of money to be made with amphetamines . TONS. While controls may amp up ( no pun intended) I dont see big pharma walking away from this particular cash cow. On a related note the push for legalized psilocybins ( along with ubiquitous now legal weed ) concerns me . I see lots of ads on the web/social media for psilocybins as a way of managing anxiety and adhd “symptoms”. Ok and here is where I begin to sound seriously cynical… If you were a statist ideologue working with public/private cronies … would you rather have a focused and attentive populace or one which survives in a numbed out, altered state which passively slides through life?
I agree! This is where I am torn and its the same issue you posted. Keeping people medicated and sedated is the ideal way to continue to impose the world that the statists want. On the flip side of that…..if they start taking away meds from people and create mass chaos, does that also fulfill their agenda of creating an angry mad hostile population who then go do stupid things and wind up dead or in trouble? Will the meth problem skyrocket due to no access to amphetamines? Which then lands people in a whole other pile of trouble? People can get brand name Adderall no problem. It is just the generic that is impossible to find. Insurance won’t pay for brand, and cash pay on it is around $200 per month. Pharma wins with their brand getting purchased not their generics. I agree with you 100%!
Also, sneak peek…..in a few days there will be a post about the drug company who bought out the original pharma company who brought brand name Adderall to the market. I am still working on that post but it is a doozy.
I’m with you. I can see destabilizing people by removing medication upon which they have become dependent as a means to create unrest so that the proverbial boot can come down on neck as another aspect to the dialectic .
Also creating a finite supply so that people beg the govt for more which is doled out by the state “ to keep it equal”. Control control control.
So many simultaneous angles to consider. It’s never just one thing.
If you have not read the book written some time ago called Bats in the Belfry by Ellen McClay I highly recommend searching it out . It’s not easy to find. She addresses some of these issues as they began presenting themselves back in the 1950’s. If I could figure out how to upload my copy to archive.net I would .
Are you suggesting that there may be a group of people who may not be benevolently working in our best interests? That’s a conspiracy....you may need a psych evaluation...
I agree with you and Im about to sound super cynical here and Im essentially just talking it out but…. big pharma has LOTS of money to be made with amphetamines . TONS. While controls may amp up ( no pun intended) I dont see big pharma walking away from this particular cash cow. On a related note the push for legalized psilocybins ( along with ubiquitous now legal weed ) concerns me . I see lots of ads on the web/social media for psilocybins as a way of managing anxiety and adhd “symptoms”. Ok and here is where I begin to sound seriously cynical… If you were a statist ideologue working with public/private cronies … would you rather have a focused and attentive populace or one which survives in a numbed out, altered state which passively slides through life?
I agree! This is where I am torn and its the same issue you posted. Keeping people medicated and sedated is the ideal way to continue to impose the world that the statists want. On the flip side of that…..if they start taking away meds from people and create mass chaos, does that also fulfill their agenda of creating an angry mad hostile population who then go do stupid things and wind up dead or in trouble? Will the meth problem skyrocket due to no access to amphetamines? Which then lands people in a whole other pile of trouble? People can get brand name Adderall no problem. It is just the generic that is impossible to find. Insurance won’t pay for brand, and cash pay on it is around $200 per month. Pharma wins with their brand getting purchased not their generics. I agree with you 100%!
Also, sneak peek…..in a few days there will be a post about the drug company who bought out the original pharma company who brought brand name Adderall to the market. I am still working on that post but it is a doozy.
I’m with you. I can see destabilizing people by removing medication upon which they have become dependent as a means to create unrest so that the proverbial boot can come down on neck as another aspect to the dialectic .
Also creating a finite supply so that people beg the govt for more which is doled out by the state “ to keep it equal”. Control control control.
So many simultaneous angles to consider. It’s never just one thing.
If you have not read the book written some time ago called Bats in the Belfry by Ellen McClay I highly recommend searching it out . It’s not easy to find. She addresses some of these issues as they began presenting themselves back in the 1950’s. If I could figure out how to upload my copy to archive.net I would .
Are you suggesting that there may be a group of people who may not be benevolently working in our best interests? That’s a conspiracy....you may need a psych evaluation...
Lol. Right? How dare I question our benevolent overlords .