2 Comments
⭠ Return to thread

Laughably ignorant. Natural Immunity from a previous infection without vaccine is much better than their 86% statistic, much better. Within a period of 10 months, depending on whether or not you have been re-exposed (which boosts immunity naturally), that number is 99%. There will always be outliers but they must be statistically ignored. That 86% figure groups previous infection without vaccination with previous infection with vaccination. There are about 100 studies that show the negative effect of vaccination on true natural immunity. For them to go on and encourage that you poison yourself with a product from their sponsor, is just as irresponsible as when they printed that vaccine immunity is better than natural immunity from a previous infection. That was a bold face lie, and they new it. But since nobody watches NBC anymore, they need the subsidies given to them by the likes of Pfizer and are will to do and say whatever it takes to please their pharma masters.

The mass production if iG4 antibodies is done solely by the vaccines. That greatly weakens immune response. There are many other factors about the vaccine that further weaken your immune system, like the spike sticking around and spreading, which creates a near constant immune response. It is our best estimate, that the reason the body mass produces the much weaker iG4 antibodies, is due to immunity fatigue from a spike that does NOT get discarded.

Expand full comment

You nailed it!!!!

Expand full comment