NBC states that natural immunity from having covid is AS PROTECTIVE as the vaccine from serious infection and death.
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(22)02465-5/fulltext
Some of you may have seen this headline last week on good ol NBC News:
This lovely NBC article is in response to the journal article listed above from the Lancet.
“Immunity acquired from a Covid infection provides strong, lasting protection against the most severe outcomes of the illness, according to research published Thursday in The Lancet — protection, experts say, that’s on par with what’s provided through two doses of an mRNA vaccine.
Infection-acquired immunity cut the risk of hospitalization and death from a Covid reinfection by 88% for at least 10 months, the study found.”
The immunity generated from an infection was found to be “at least as high, if not higher” than that provided by two doses of an mRNA vaccine, the authors wrote. Notably, the immunity acquired from infection did appear to wane more slowly than the immunity from two doses of an mRNA vaccine.
Of course the NBC article still touts how important it is to “get a vAcCiNe” because you know, if you are one of the people who catch omicron to be immune to covid you might die. Note my dry heaving as I type that blurb from the NBC article. We already know Omicron is more on par with a cold or flu, not the previous version of covid they lab leaked into the world. The previous versions of covid also had rampant use of Remdesivir and Midazolam and ventilators, which killed more people than covid itself did. I digress.
The Lancet study only examined people who were not vaccinated plus infected with covid. It only looked at people who caught covid but not vaccinated so they could examine the efficacy of natural immunity without the vaccine on board.
Findings: Protection from past infection against re-infection from pre-omicron variants was very high and remained high even after 40 weeks. Protection from severe disease was high for all variants. The immunity conferred by past infection should be weighed alongside protection from vaccination when assessing future disease burden from COVID-19, providing guidance on when individuals should be vaccinated, and designing policies that mandate vaccination for workers or restrict access, on the basis of immune status, to settings where the risk of transmission is high, such as travel and high-occupancy indoor settings.
Inclusion criteria: Any study with results for the protective effect of COVID-19 natural immunity in individuals who were non-vaccinated in comparison with those who were non-vaccinated and COVID-19 naive were included in our analysis. We also included studies that included individuals who were vaccinated but controlled for vaccination status. We included retrospective and prospective cohort studies, and test-negative case-control studies. Any study that included results only for the protective effectiveness of natural immunity in combination with vaccination (ie, hybrid immunity) was excluded from the analysis. (Important to note here, they DID examine people who were vaccinated, but excluded them fro the final data results and findings. I am guessing the vaccinated who caught covid did not have as high of N antibodies as those unvaccinated did now did they?)
Important to note: this study was paid for by……..you guessed it…….Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, J Stanton, T Gillespie, and J and E Nordstrom. So being in the Lancet, plus financing by Gates makes this piece interesting. Why did they publish this? Damage control for why vaccinated people are getting covid over and over and the unvaccinated are not? Damage control for the side effects of the covid vaccine? Preparing us for a different version of mandates and vax requirements down the line? Who knows. But the devil that funded this study is not one of the good guys. Yet the data gathered is credible as we have all seen these studies done for the lat 1-2 years and KNOW that immunity is greater among the unvaxxed versus the vaxxed. We know that when we look at immune levels that vaccinated have approximately 42% N antibodies compared to their unvaccinated cohort that have 92% N-antibodies. So the data is correct, I just don’t know why the “team vaccinate” would release this now. Although Gates did say recently that the current vaccines did not perform “as expected” with transmission reduction of covid so maybe this is how they launch the next generation of vaccines? Time will tell.
And I had to lose my job even after showing them I had Covid and recovered. Makes me want to puke.
Laughably ignorant. Natural Immunity from a previous infection without vaccine is much better than their 86% statistic, much better. Within a period of 10 months, depending on whether or not you have been re-exposed (which boosts immunity naturally), that number is 99%. There will always be outliers but they must be statistically ignored. That 86% figure groups previous infection without vaccination with previous infection with vaccination. There are about 100 studies that show the negative effect of vaccination on true natural immunity. For them to go on and encourage that you poison yourself with a product from their sponsor, is just as irresponsible as when they printed that vaccine immunity is better than natural immunity from a previous infection. That was a bold face lie, and they new it. But since nobody watches NBC anymore, they need the subsidies given to them by the likes of Pfizer and are will to do and say whatever it takes to please their pharma masters.
The mass production if iG4 antibodies is done solely by the vaccines. That greatly weakens immune response. There are many other factors about the vaccine that further weaken your immune system, like the spike sticking around and spreading, which creates a near constant immune response. It is our best estimate, that the reason the body mass produces the much weaker iG4 antibodies, is due to immunity fatigue from a spike that does NOT get discarded.