85 Comments

"So lets back up just a little bit and remember what day this was. January 6th, 2021. Everyone knows “that day”. There were 100 members of congress set to request a 10 day investigation into possible election fraud. A few members spoke on the house floor, and then “January 6th” happened. When the congress reconvened late that night, they voted down the investigation into fraud that was introduced, they stated that no further election fraud concerns would be heard “in light of the days events”, they were pushing through to certify the election. And that is what they did."

So many people forget this. January 6th was the day that the states were going to broadcast the election shenanigans across the airwaves. The 'riot' VERY VERY conveniently canceled that testimony -- and it was never picked up again.

Seems pretty obvious to me that Pelosi had a plan, and that plan was to Let It Happen On Purpose. (And if it doesn't, utilize the embedded FBI agents.)

Expand full comment
author

1000% this. I was chatting with a colleague at lunch about this. How much planning went into making sure they had a “rip cord” option if the “election fraud” talk got introduced to the house floor……because what was it, 2-3 congress members had presented about the suspected fraud and then poof, all hell broke loose with the “invasion” of the capital? 100% it was planned. She refused national guard and extra security for a reason. Her planted peeps couldn’t perform their “act” if they had eyes on them! Rotten wench.

Expand full comment

IIRC we were still making our way through the "A" states when everything was canceled.

OT: SUBSTACK MOVE YOUR CANCEL BUTTON

Expand full comment
author

LMAO! And yes!! We hadn’t even gotten out of the A’s yet before, you know, the “thing” happened. 🤦🏼‍♀️

Expand full comment
Jan 5, 2023Liked by Jennifer Brown

Dude! You and that cancel button! 😉😊😋🤣

Expand full comment

At least once a day.

Expand full comment
Nov 29, 2022·edited Nov 29, 2022Liked by Jennifer Brown

Such a crucial point - and a coordinated attack by these hijackers of the country to undermine the investigation. Thank you for pointing this out. This is HUGE!

Expand full comment
Dec 1, 2022Liked by Jennifer Brown

I think the lightbulb went on in all of our heads when she eloquently referred to the events of January 6…it was a plan within a plan! We might all think Pelosi is disgusting but certainly can’t call her stupid. She got two years down the road with this one.

Expand full comment

And that's why we have this SCOTUS case. Congress didn't do their job.

Interesting SCOTUS case hit the docket: Brunson vs Adams, et al. We have never seen anything like this before. Docket: https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22-380/243739/20221027152243533_20221027-152110-95757954-00007015.pdf Their case hinges on constitutional amendment violations of the right to due process. When an election has concerns of fraud, constitution allows for a 10 day investigation to look at the potential fraud questions and determine if fraud did or did not occur. This case is NOT one of election fraud, it is about congress and the senate NOT doing their oath of office and violating Amendment I to the constitution, Article VI of the constitution, the 14th Amendment of the constitution, section 3, the 5th and the 9th Amendment of the constitution, as well as a couple of Utah State Constitution articles. (The Supreme Court, more important than you know.) It began in the state of Utah, then transferred to federal court when there were originally 3 defendants listed, Biden and Harris as well as Nancy Pelosi, and then 381 other defendents AND over 100 Jane/John Does to the defendent list. All are Federal Government members that are named so far. https://docbrown77.substack.com/p/interesting-scotus-case-hit-the-docket

Expand full comment

Thank you, Dr. Funtimes! I have become friends (Gag alert cuz I'm about to brag.) with a woman here in FL from Utah. She is friends with the Brunson brothers! She alerted me to this case's progress several weeks back and practically screamed in her text update when it made it to the Supreme Court docket.

You have provided such an outstanding, easy-to-understand explanation of this case. Will cross post, of course. ❤️

Expand full comment
author

Girl you brag all you want! Isn’t this what we call “a famous moment”? I think so!!!! Email me any fun updates you get I would love to follow the journey! Also, slightly jealous you are in Florida today when its gross winter here. Get some sun for me!!! 😎

Expand full comment

I think it is a "famous moment"! LOL!

All quiet here so far re updates, but happy to let you know if I hear anything that I can share.

Yes, we're very fortunate to have been able to leave the northeast gulag for the free country of Florida. :) And for more reasons than just the weathuh.

Expand full comment
Dec 1, 2022Liked by Jennifer Brown

VERY interesting! Thanks for sharing! Let’s go!!

Expand full comment
Nov 28, 2022Liked by Jennifer Brown

While I am happy to read about this, I have lost all faith in our federal system, including the Scotus.

There can be ABSOLUTELY no doubt that the 2020 presidential election was riddled with systemic, systematic and pervasive vote manipulation and outright fraud. This was a stolen election. On that point there can be no doubt among rational, thinking people who value individual rights and freedom. The US Senate failed on January 6, 2021 when they certified the stolen election and legitimized the fraud by putting the puppet, Joey in the White House, along with the whore.

Clearly, the only proper outcome from this Supreme Court case would be to overturn that election if indeed that’s even possible . Frankly, I’m pessimistic, because I believe the Scotus is also fatally compromised just like the other branches of our government.

The same globalist entities that launched the Wuhan “pandemic“ on the world, and then the even more egregious and criminal “vaccine“ treatment, for it will not allow for their henchmen who are now entrenched in the executive branch of the US government to be removed.

Anybody who is counting on this to happen, is living in a detached from all reality, fantasy world. Sorry folks, that’s just the way it is.

Expand full comment
author

I don’t disagree at all. What should be done and what will be done are not always what they should be. SCOTUS has a ton of problems, and one could compellingly argue that all 3 branches of government are completely corrupted at this point in the game. What they decide to do with this case will most certainly answer the question of “who do they answer to”: the constitution they were “selected” to uphold, or their handlers. And I snorted at the Joey and the whore 😂😂

Expand full comment
Nov 28, 2022Liked by Jennifer Brown

LOL! Well, Jennifer, I will admit that I was holding back and my characterization and depiction of “her”… 🤣

Expand full comment
author

Someday, I will post a video on here just for you. I do an uncanny vocal impersonation of the whore, but I call her heels up knee pads down 😂

Expand full comment
Nov 29, 2022Liked by Jennifer Brown

LOL!!!! “ heals up kneepads down”!!!

I love it.

I hope you do that. In return I’ll send you a picture of my daughter who come up when she was walking by her senate office building office took a selfie of herself a flipping off her name plate.

Expand full comment
author

Deal!!!!

Expand full comment
Nov 29, 2022Liked by Jennifer Brown

I the case of daughter - the apple didn’t fall too far from the tree! She works with a lot of the conservative ‘luminaries’

Expand full comment
Nov 29, 2022Liked by Jennifer Brown

I hate it when you hold back like that Stan. Next time say what you REALLY mean okay? LOL.

Expand full comment
Nov 29, 2022Liked by Jennifer Brown

That’s just because I’m a shy, retiring type of personality. I’m working hard at it, trying to express my real inner feelings, it’s a struggle I promise to work harder at it, and do better next time, Tony. I appreciate your candor and that you brought it to my attention!🤣

Expand full comment

Perfect.

Expand full comment
Nov 29, 2022·edited Nov 29, 2022Liked by Jennifer Brown

As much as I hate to believe this, I feel the same. The ONLY reason SCOTUS is taking this up, IMO, is to use as leverage against the Dems who are planning several "overhauls" to the most high Justice system we have in place, come next month. They plan to push Term limits for SC, and to Pack the house, before they are thrown out on their backsides. (See my comment below) There's a website called 7discoveries.com that belongs to the Brunson brothers and has copies of the filings available for $1.00, (which is available free if you google it) but I am supporting them in their quest, so just wanted to share that. There was a podcast on Rumble with Loy Brunson I listened to yesterday (First I'd heard of this) and it's over an hour long but worth listening to, it has some updates by Loy himself. Him, the host and some guy called "Ghost" talk about the possible outcomes, but it just seems a little too much to accept, although we can certainly HOPE they take action! We need more people like these very smart men!

Expand full comment
author

YES! I watched that Rumble video last night! A friend chatted with me earlier today and we both agreed this is a loaded grenade with the pin half pulled……if they do something war will break out. If they don’t do something, war could break out. Part of me wonders if this is why it is not getting much alternative media coverage. There is very little out there discussing it! The MSM obviously won’t cover it but even the underground independent media has been pretty quiet. Everyone is still busy bickering about the intro to the Died Suddenly video and Malone’s 25 million dollar lawsuit he launched. Not focused on this at allllll! I am with you…..I would gladly pay to support the cause! Wasn’t the trumpet playing history of those boys fascinating??!?!

Expand full comment

Yes, I got a kick out of that. As well as the "Definition" of what a "Trump Card" means. "trump card" -an advantage that makes you more likely to succeed than other people, especially something that other people do not know about".

OR-

"A final factor or resource that determines an outcome"

Expand full comment

Yes, the silence on this is deafening -- and it's obvious why. Both of the scenarios you describe are possible. If the Supremes somehow figure out how to "boot" this case, we know the republic is truly done for -- as if we needed more evidence and more destruction!

Re the Brunsons' trumpet-playing past, the woman I've become friends with here who knows them shared that with me. :) The Brunsons are quite something...

Expand full comment

Thank you, Jennifer. I know of 7discoveries and intend to make purchases of several of their documents.

I think I may have listened to the same podcast? Was if John B. Wells' "Caravan to Midnight"? I listened to a good chunk of it, but will have to back to finish. Did Loy say in the podcast those points about term limits for the SC and pack the House?

I know this probably sounds silly given the lawlessness and criminality all around us, but limiting the terms of the "Supremes" would require a Constitutional amendment since Article III is pretty clear about tenure...

Expand full comment

Yes, I think it was Loy who said that, but it could have been the other guy "Ghost". I believe that is the podcast I watched...

Expand full comment

This case is not about election fraud or overturning the election.

Expand full comment
Nov 29, 2022Liked by Jennifer Brown

Not yet, but I believe it will be before this case is done being adjudicated.

Expand full comment

The case involves the election, certainly, but proper adjudication of this case will come down to addressing the following: Does the law require an investigation into lawful complaints related to elections? ✔️ Is this law constitutional? ✔️ By failing to undertake these investigations, did those named in this suit violate their oaths and therefore deny the voters assurances of a fair and honest election? ✔️ As a result, are those named subject to penalty, including removal from office and negation of their right to hold public office ever again? ✔️

What comes after that remains to be seen.

Expand full comment
Dec 5, 2022·edited Dec 5, 2022Liked by Jennifer Brown

I need to amend my comment here as I have been straightened out in my interpretation of the case. The first two statements are inaccurate, so I apologize.

The case rests on the oath of office -- one -- and two -- the duty to protect and defend the Constitution, and by extension, the nation/republic. So, this is not about a 𝒍𝒂𝒘 to do so. It's about the oath to do so. It's about the obligation to investigate credible complaints that involve possible threats to the national security via 𝒆𝒍𝒆𝒄𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝒊𝒏𝒕𝒆𝒓𝒇𝒆𝒓𝒆𝒏𝒄𝒆.

In another thread on another 'Stack, a "retired litigator" informed me that this case has little if any merit since the Congressional oath of office is "ceremonial, not legal."

I'll bet you didn't know that. So, "boys and girls," just "ceremonial" indicating nothing, requiring nothing, and leaving no remedy for failure to uphold. Case closed.

Expand full comment
Dec 6, 2022Liked by Jennifer Brown
author

The most vocal ones saying this case will go nowhere are all “attorneys/lawyers”. Lol the oath to uphold the constitution is “ceremonial”. I wonder if the military sees it that way when THEY take that same oath…….

Expand full comment

Federal law regulating oath of office by government officials is divided into four parts along with an executive order which further defines the law for purposes of enforcement. 5 U.S.C. 3331, provides the text of the actual oath of office members of Congress are required to take before assuming office. 5 U.S.C. 3333 requires members of Congress sign an affidavit that they have taken the oath of office required by 5 U.S.C. 3331 and have not or will not violate that oath of office during their tenure of office as defined by the third part of the law, 5 U.S.C. 7311 which explicitly makes it a federal criminal offense (and a violation of oath of office) for anyone employed in the United States Government (including members of Congress) to “advocate the overthrow of our constitutional form of government”. The fourth federal law, 18 U.S.C. 1918 provides penalties for violation of oath office described in 5 U.S.C. 7311 which include: (1) removal from office and; (2) confinement or a fine.

Expand full comment

Oh, Paine! This is fantastic! Thank you so much. I love that part about the affidavit. So, "Congress Critter," you've taken the oath? Now sign here as backup to it. This here affidavit is the legal teeth behind your "ceremonial" oath of office.

Love, love, love. Thank you. Also, saw your other comment about "my" lawyer friend being wrong and how much you love saying that. Hilarious! Will go back and go through the link you provided. Very, very grateful.

Expand full comment
Nov 28, 2022Liked by Jennifer Brown

Or might this be a ploy by the globalists/Deep State/tyrants for SCOTUS to rule against the case so as to attempt to stop the tsunami of citizens becoming aware of our manipulated elections - to attempt to “officially”delegitimize or put to death any fraud concerns?

Expand full comment
author

It could be……the fact they waived their right to respond seems odd at best…..If they do their job, which is to purely uphold the constitution, then this decision could be huge!!!!!

Expand full comment
Nov 28, 2022Liked by Jennifer Brown

Unfortunately, Jennifer, the reason this illegitimate administration allowed the case to go forward, quickly, is because they are convinced of the outcome, and that outcome will be in their favor, and will further serve to give credibility to the massive, pervasive, systematic, voter manipulation, and fraud that was committed and the 2020 elections and now in the 2022 elections

Expand full comment
Nov 28, 2022Liked by Jennifer Brown

You are correct Bobby, that is the most likely scenario. That’s why Joey’s handlers did not oppose this case to go forward in the supreme court right now.

Expand full comment
Dec 17, 2022Liked by Jennifer Brown

Trump and the Military are Joey's Handlers. You haven't figured this out yet? You really think Trump would just walk away after stating we were at War with China and let them steal the Election? What was EO 13848 about then? We are in Devolution since DNI Ratcliffe turned over evidence of fraud to the military.

Let me be clear: This case will not be decided on 1/6/23... it will become even bigger with all of the evidence gathered from 2020 and 2022. Trump will be reinstated after January 20th (but not before the economic collapse), serve out the remaining time of "Biden's Term" and still be eligible for 4 more years.

Expand full comment
Dec 17, 2022·edited Dec 17, 2022Liked by Jennifer Brown

I certainly hope that you are correct. I’m also extraordinarily dubious that you are. We, Americans, are in a really deep shit. I am certain, at least, as certain as I can be that “Joeys handlers“ are the WEF scum that are trying to run this country, and indeed the entire world into the ground. Once again, I hope you’re right, but there is absolutely no indication that you are.

Expand full comment
author

Totally agree with everything you just said. Deep shit is fact. We are in deep deep shit.

Expand full comment

It needed to happen. When Trump first came on the scene, and I saw a few moves that showed me he was serious about what he said at his Inauguration, I knew a collapse was coming. The system has to be destroyed and the bad guys have to go down with the ship. It was the only way to get free from the Central Bankers.

Expand full comment

There are plenty of indications... Biden fails at every attempt to please the Left. He keeps promising things and then pulling a "FOOLED YOU!!!" Everything he touches turns to crap. Anyone who says they're behind him still is borderline retarded and mentally checked out. Most of these people used free will to exit the planet shortly by taking the jabs -- they won't be a problem for long.

Expand full comment
Nov 28, 2022Liked by Jennifer Brown

Great report. Thank you.

With the exception of a few of the Scotus judges, I am not filled with hope that they will not again instantly capitulate to their democrat masters.

Expand full comment
author

It is a nerve wracking case. It cold go so many ways……..pray hard! 🙏🏻

Expand full comment
Nov 28, 2022Liked by Jennifer Brown

I call this the most original story I've come across today. Certainly, the process and decision will be very telling and consequential. Thanks Jennifer.

Expand full comment

Thanks for posting.

Be a miracle indeed if the case isn't "interfered" with.

Expand full comment

Got to Love this! Thank You for this reporting.

Expand full comment

I just watched a podcast with Loy Brunson last night, that was the first I had heard of this! This could be HUGE! As of last night, the SCOTUS could possibly be wanting this so badly because the top Dems are planning to push through legislation to A. Set term limits for the SCOTUS, and to Pack the court (Likely more crazy stuff too) in December, as they are now in a Lame duck administration. They want to push through as much as possible before they are tossed out on their backsides. So, in the podcast they were discussing that the SC could use this as leverage to keep these "plans" from happening, or that they could ACT on this- Whatever that would look like, no one knows. They did say that if the SC were to rule in favor of the plaintiffs, this could/would remove all the listed representatives the POTUS, VP, Former VP , Speaker, plus all those that voted to ignore those 100 representatives that did not want to certify the election, out of office- To be removed Immediately! There was talk that since Donald Trump never conceded to Joe Biden, that he would be President. Then would need to call for a State of Emergency, to replace the VP, and create an entirely new House/Senate, because ALL Democrats and many Republicans would need to be replaced as well. All the Executive orders that were enforced during the Biden admin would have to be revoked, reworked, even they don't know. THIS IS MASSIVE. I do feel very concerned that this may not go very far. I have seen the way these politicians cover each others arses, because it affects their wallets. They are tied to lobbyist and in the pockets of those Corporations/Organizations they are beholden to. This would damage the entire country (in the interim) as the country is basically "RESET". That may all be WAY out of line, I cannot see the SC basically charging over half of the House & Senate and elites with Treason (although this is a Civil suit- If any criminal maleficence is found, they could be charged criminally) and Breach of their

"Oath of office". I mean we are talking about the Governors of states, too. So I am not sure WHAT, if any remedies could be taken in the event that the SC rules for these plaintiffs. I do see that they WANTED this suit in their hands (The SCOTUS) for some reason, and I am leaning with them using it as ammunition to keep those that seek to change the basic fundamental structure of the Supreme Court. I guess we will see! They also have a website "7discoveries.com" that you can follow along with the case. I intend to share it anywhere I can, because the Media sure as hell won't cover this unless they absolutely have to! We need to alert as many people as possible! Anway, sorry for the long rant, but this is big, or has the potential to be. We have been talking, tweeting, complaining about needing CHANGE...This could be the answer, if we stand together and back them up!

Jennifer Clark

Expand full comment
author

It makes you wonder what the 100+ “Jane and John Doe’s” are…….one has to speculate its the state governments who failed to investigate the election fraud potential as well! Batter up Michigan, Wisconsin, Georgia…….all of them!

Standing proudly with you sister! If SCOTUS finds their moral compass, the entire swamp could go down. I think we have all been let down so much we don’t dare hope for something as grand as that scenario. After watching that Rumble video I felt more hope but I have hoped many many times only to be let down……. So nerve wracking waiting to see what chess pawn gets moved next!! Hold the line! ❤️

Expand full comment
Nov 28, 2022Liked by Jennifer Brown

Great writing!

Thank you.

Expand full comment

The people against the Uniparty.

Expand full comment

Praying for this Watergate like cleansing.

Expand full comment
author

Amen friend. Amen. 🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻

Expand full comment
Dec 1, 2022Liked by Jennifer Brown

This case is brilliant! Obviously the government doesn’t think it’s a big deal if they did not even bother to respond, or they believe they will win. I’d like to see the argument on this one.

Expand full comment

Me too. Can any lawyers out there give us the argument that would make them so confident that they don’t have to worry about this case?

Expand full comment
author

So far, not a single one has. I keep waiting for a compelling argument from one!

Expand full comment
Dec 1, 2022Liked by Jennifer Brown

Thank you so much for breaking this down for us. I’ve been following for a couple weeks since I heard about the case and your info really helped answer some questions. Praying the SCOTUS does the right thing!! 🙏

Expand full comment

Not only did Pelosii refuse Pres. Trump's offer of the guard, only about 1/4. Of the "palace" guards were deployed while the Natiobal Guard was directing traffic. While some of the tagged as rioters, others were and still are, imprisoned, one woman died and NETD'S doc-umentary on Jan 6 shows the CIA? Plant yelling for insurrection and people shouting at him that he was a stooge and and for protesters not to pay him any mind.

Expand full comment
Nov 30, 2022Liked by Jennifer Brown

Sounds an awful lot like TREASON!

Expand full comment