I saw these numbers a few days ago. A word of caution, this doesn't go over well if you present this information to a Vaccine Fanatic. You know, the people who use the word "science" but would know it if it was in front of them. Why is it that they always steer the conversation in the COVID 19(84) direction?
I tried to ease this data set into just such a conversation with one of the few Vaccine Fanatics who will still speak to me. The Vaccine Fanatic instantly adopted a conversation style resembling a spoiled child with their eyes squeezed shut, fingers plugging their ears, and yelling "Ya Ya Ya Ya" as loud as they can. Open mindedness at its finest. My guess is that now I've been struck off their Christmas Card List.
Need to normalize based on number vaccinated to get risk. And we already know there is dependency on lot number. No data yet on getting shot earlier that was dirty and then getting clean shots for remainder. But all these Ya-buts emphasize the need to pull all countermeasures.
Question: where is the data showing that subsequent shots are "clean" of DNA/RNA contamination? Have they launched a new manufacturing process the same as was for the clinical trials? It's likely we will never get a detailed analysis of bad batches and why they are bad, how many are out there etc.
For that matter can anyone cite current on going analyses of DNA/gene fragments contamination still there? Other than to say it is within FDA guidelines designed before the use of LNPs?
Predictable outcome was predictable. Can we please start common law court precedings(something controlled by the people, not any government) that prosecute these poisoners for the death and injury their fanatical behavior has caused?
Now they’re going to start hiding that data from the public too 🙄. What’s it going to take for them to admit they were wrong??
I think right after the Hippocratic Oath,
doctors are ushered into a backroom for Omerta ceremonies.
I saw these numbers a few days ago. A word of caution, this doesn't go over well if you present this information to a Vaccine Fanatic. You know, the people who use the word "science" but would know it if it was in front of them. Why is it that they always steer the conversation in the COVID 19(84) direction?
I tried to ease this data set into just such a conversation with one of the few Vaccine Fanatics who will still speak to me. The Vaccine Fanatic instantly adopted a conversation style resembling a spoiled child with their eyes squeezed shut, fingers plugging their ears, and yelling "Ya Ya Ya Ya" as loud as they can. Open mindedness at its finest. My guess is that now I've been struck off their Christmas Card List.
Some people cannot be helped.
Need to normalize based on number vaccinated to get risk. And we already know there is dependency on lot number. No data yet on getting shot earlier that was dirty and then getting clean shots for remainder. But all these Ya-buts emphasize the need to pull all countermeasures.
Question: where is the data showing that subsequent shots are "clean" of DNA/RNA contamination? Have they launched a new manufacturing process the same as was for the clinical trials? It's likely we will never get a detailed analysis of bad batches and why they are bad, how many are out there etc.
For that matter can anyone cite current on going analyses of DNA/gene fragments contamination still there? Other than to say it is within FDA guidelines designed before the use of LNPs?
Yeah but if they did a daily dose of the juice instead of a just few boosters they could have lowered the rate to only 94% of total.
Predictable outcome was predictable. Can we please start common law court precedings(something controlled by the people, not any government) that prosecute these poisoners for the death and injury their fanatical behavior has caused?
With an emphasis on EFFECTIVE! How about deaths from mRNA side effects for the vaccinated and unvaccinated. Pretty sure that goes 100% to 0%.
https://substack.com/profile/22354262-jwm_in_va/note/c-48533322?r=db4nq