2 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
JWM_IN_VA's avatar

Understood..Apologies for the tone and disrespect wasn't intended. My big concern is wasted efforts trying to get the FDA to do something it is not required to due to the construct of the prep act and subsequent OTA contract held by the ARMY (DoD). Many authors are extremely averse to making that connection because they are afraid of the implications.

Expand full comment
Jennifer Brown's avatar

I 100% agree with you. Trying to go about this with the FDA is a huge waste of time, it isn’t their project. It is 100% governmental deployed DOD nonsense. The FDA is just the cover/medium/outsourced agency with the “face” on the injections. A year ago I came across documents that insinuated this, and no one believed it and thought they were fake DARPA papers. Now we know that they were true. Sad isn’t it. There are not many who were willing to go out on a limb and discuss it, which is sad as well. Others have way more data than I do, I have only scratched the surface with DOD/DARPA, but I promise I am not afraid to post what I learn about that organization, and I promise my goal isn’t to go after the FDA for this. It was our own government that did this.

Expand full comment