I am a board-certified layperson and reading that long statistical paragraph makes my teeth itch. For this reason, I am deeply indebted to ethical experts like Dr. F. We can see here why the cabal has chosen disease scares and their associated emergency conditions to impose tyranny. Most people are simply befuddled by all the jargon and just follow simple instructions ─ like standing 6 feet apart. I guess if you really get confused, your best bet is just to zig when they say zag.
Wow. Great post. Thank you Jennifer. Sadly, the only people I know with serious heart issues now are people who were vaccinated. Thanks for revealing the truth! Peace. :-)
If it was about attempting to find the answer, would not the study have remained "in play?"
I can already hear the answer to this question "Studies are archived for a variety of reasons, the reason proposed by the anti-maskers are a conspiracy theory."
I don't like inconvenient truths as much as anybody, but isn't it childish behavior to put on blinders and keep on going "as if" the material didn't exist? I imagine if medical officials could, they would remove the Cochrane report, instead they chose, for the benefit of those well versed in the narrative, to editorialize it...effectively putting a disclaimer on it. This is so the faithful and devoted can feel justified in their continued loyalty. And for us conspiracy theorists it is meant as a back handed "No, for the millionth time, masks are effective."
This study is inconvenient because it destroys the only remaining "justification" for the Mrna vax - "lesser risk of serious illness or death." The risk/benefit ratios for myocarditis alone is negative., especially considering myocarditis is one of the most lethal and lifelong disabling vaccine injuries known and prevails in the young and healthy.
I am a board-certified layperson and reading that long statistical paragraph makes my teeth itch. For this reason, I am deeply indebted to ethical experts like Dr. F. We can see here why the cabal has chosen disease scares and their associated emergency conditions to impose tyranny. Most people are simply befuddled by all the jargon and just follow simple instructions ─ like standing 6 feet apart. I guess if you really get confused, your best bet is just to zig when they say zag.
Wow. Great post. Thank you Jennifer. Sadly, the only people I know with serious heart issues now are people who were vaccinated. Thanks for revealing the truth! Peace. :-)
This is another indicator.
If it was about attempting to find the answer, would not the study have remained "in play?"
I can already hear the answer to this question "Studies are archived for a variety of reasons, the reason proposed by the anti-maskers are a conspiracy theory."
I don't like inconvenient truths as much as anybody, but isn't it childish behavior to put on blinders and keep on going "as if" the material didn't exist? I imagine if medical officials could, they would remove the Cochrane report, instead they chose, for the benefit of those well versed in the narrative, to editorialize it...effectively putting a disclaimer on it. This is so the faithful and devoted can feel justified in their continued loyalty. And for us conspiracy theorists it is meant as a back handed "No, for the millionth time, masks are effective."
This study is inconvenient because it destroys the only remaining "justification" for the Mrna vax - "lesser risk of serious illness or death." The risk/benefit ratios for myocarditis alone is negative., especially considering myocarditis is one of the most lethal and lifelong disabling vaccine injuries known and prevails in the young and healthy.
Thanks Jennifer. Pulled. Pull my hair out with frustration at the lies & cover ups.