https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35678258/
Data was gathered from December 2020 - June 2021. So 6 months of data. Right at the launch of covid vaccines. “We identified 1133 AKI cases. Pfizer-BNT appeared to have a stronger Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) correlation than MODERNA and JANSSEN, based on the highest reporting odds ratio. We observed the differences in ages, comorbidities, current illnesses, post-vaccine AKI causes, and time to AKI onset (all p<.05) among three vaccines. Most patients are elderly, with the highest age in MODERNA (68.41 years) and lowest in JANSSEN (59.75 years).” The data was gathered from the VAERS database.
AKI cases were most commonly reported in Illinois, California, and Florida, mainly from March to May. I wonder why these states? During this time frame?
Also, those who suffered from acute kidney injury did not recover, on average. Several died. AKI following the COVID-19 vaccines led to poor prognosis, with 19.78% death in the Pfizer-BNT group, 17.78% in MODERNA, and 12.36% in JANSSEN.
23.60% of cases of AKI concerning JANSSEN were admitted to the clinic visit, and 55.34% of cases of AKI concerning Pfizer-BNT visited the emergency room. Dialysis requirement rates after AKI were different among the three vaccine groups, with the highest in JANSSEN (14.61%) and the lowest in Pfizer-BNT (6.54%). The most common cause of kidney injury for the JANSSEN group was microclotting in the kidney.
So lets reflect a bit here. In a mere 6 months of vaccinations, we had nearly 1200 cases of acute kidney injury, primarily in a 2 month window, in 3 states. That safety signal alone should have put an end to vaccinations. But it didn’t. Acute kidney injury usually leads to recovery once the offending agent has left the body, but in the case of the vaccines, they do not leave the body. The numbers who died are high. This was in the early days of the vaccine launch, and we failed to stop putting vaccines into arms.
As to Jennifer's "I wonder why these states..." question regarding distribution of reports adverse AKI events, I'm not sure if it was rhetorical but I have seen articles in which it's been inferred that delivery patterns of certain "bad batches" can be rather stunningly plotted out on a map. The EN6200 series Pfizer/BioNTech batches (and their notorious AE reports in VAERS) seemed to align themselves rather dramatically along the I-75 corridor from Florida up through the rust belt states. Just an inference; no hard data to prove causation. Maybe that's the case with these AKIs. We'll never really know, is my guess. When my Congresswoman, Hillary Scholten (US 3rd-MI), tells me in a letter I wrote to her regarding a vax injury I suffered (per my medical team--lacunar infarct to the ventral posterolateral thalamus) that the vaccines "have been proven safe and effective under careful monitoring and trials", who in power can we trust to stop allowing themselves to be propagandists? She cites CDC and FDA twaddle when doing so when we all know damn well that the VAERS and VSafe data--and big pharma's own studies!--belie any such claims.
Daughter of a friend of ours got injected because the son of her boyfriend has an impaired immune system. Okaaaaaay...
She got two Phizer needles. Within six months, full on kidney failure. Docs are sure it's not the junk. It's a genetic disorder. Oh, really, doc? Yeah. Probably got this from your mother. (Just so special you are, doc. Blaming out-of-the-blue kidney failure on a genetic disorder that the person got from her mother...Nice one.) Of course, mother not injected and doing fine. Goes for a rash of tests to check to make sure she's OK. Of course, mother's kidneys are fine...)
Anyway, daughter has had multiple hospitalizations. Endured the "blow up" of high-dose steroids early on. Out of the hospital now and doing better, but assured by docs she'll never go back to full kidney function.
And all of this is just so mysterious...or a genetic disorder...but definitely 𝒏𝒐𝒕 the injectable junk that comes complete with product liability immunity for its makers.