4 Comments
User's avatar
Crixcyon's avatar

In every country, they have enacted something akin to the EUA (emergency use authorization) which negates all standard practices for the development, manufacture and marketing of any mRNA substance. There are no safeguards, inspections or concerns about ingredients and NO way to stop it. It's a free-for-all against the people of the world. It is the prescription for murder. Whatever safety data there is, it is total nonsense.

Expand full comment
BetterOffRed's avatar

Decades ago, i was tasked with managing the MSDS "Bible" for the printing company where i worked.

Paper copies occupied 3 huge 3-ring binders for the press and bindery departments alone.

An epiphany occurred when i inventoried and assembled the MSDS for the administration offices, which had not been done before.

A Sharpie marker is classified as hazardous, with a 14 page SDS, with markers' containing level 3 & 4 chemicals, dangerous for skin, eyes, lungs and stomach (if someone was dumb enough to chew on the barrel of the marker).

Thank you for the eye-opener, Dr FT!

... THEY CAN'T SAY the jab is HAZARDOUS, but if you handle the precursors or transport the product, you better be protected!

Expand full comment
Joe's avatar

The MSDS is the "sacred bible" of every work place.

Yet, once again, the rule maker circumvented the rules!

What a surprise.

Expand full comment
SomeDude's avatar

the FDA (and EPA and USDA) historically could care less about how functionally toxic approved substances are on the MSDS.

look at sodium fluorosilicate for example. one of several FDA approved, yet toxic waste grade dangerous on the MSDS, fluoridation chemicals. fraudulently given GRAS (Generally Recognized As Safe) status by the FDA.

https://www.fishersci.com/store/msds?partNumber=S2993&productDescription=sodium-fluoride-powdercertified-acs-fisher-chemicaltrade&vendorId=VN00033897&keyword=true&countryCode=US&language=en

Expand full comment