13 Comments

It is probably more than 1 in 4 because the people had to be aware they were harmed and I work with a group of vaccine lovers that would never equate their constant illness to the jabs. Instead when they get sick they think I need another shot. I also know someone that had immediate kidney failure after the jabs (even Reuters had articles that was a rare side effect) and he has no idea it could be shot related. No doctors tell him either. Of course to get that study published they also have to include the canned statement “Research has shown beyond doubt that mRNA vaccination against COVID-19 is safe. Billions of doses of the Moderna and Pfizer mRNA vaccines have been safely delivered, saving lives worldwide.” And they shared this study a year ago yet they keep on releasing new shots and pushing jabs. I’ve never had a moment of regret staying far away for all their EAU covid products. Criminal these are on the childhood vaccine schedule.

Expand full comment

I missed the part where THEY said they're pulling it off the market.

Expand full comment

Do we know why 25% are affected? Does the process break down 25% of the time because of bad manufacturing/distribution or some other factor? Or are 25% of people predisposed?

Expand full comment

Come on people, mRNA has been used and developed for decades DECADES! Forget the fact that it was only used on humans since 2017, and only on a few...it is safe and effective! No problems here!

Expand full comment

What an INSANE take by The Telegraph on this obvious problem: frameshifting is dangerous. Any mention of the jab juice as "safe and /or effective" by the authors of the referenced study is typical boilerplate language a research team has to use to get published. Seriously? Who believes this statement?

"Research has shown beyond doubt that mRNA vaccination against COVID-19 is safe. Billions of doses of the Moderna and Pfizer mRNA vaccines have been safely delivered, saving lives worldwide."

Horrific. And the The Telegraph article does even attempt to mention WHY pseudouridene has to be used rather than the "natural" form.

Expand full comment

My doctors still want me to get the Covid vaccines. What are their motivations for potentially harming me? 25% chance of harm is pretty darn high...

Expand full comment

They get bonus...literally.

Expand full comment

In the last 2 years, I've had multiple PCMs. Guess why. MFers...

Expand full comment

Money. Doctors get money from payors if a certain percentage of their patient load are vaccinated. Pediatricians are especially highly paid if they can get their vaxxed patient percentage up. This is why they bug you to get the tetanus, pneumovax, flu, shingles etc. I always politely but firmly tell them no.

Expand full comment

"How do we prevent this from happening again?" By understanding the Reality of what happened. By helping the General Public to understand the Reality of what happened - that they were subjected to a long planned, fully orchestrated program to deny them real prevention measures and real treatment measures, causing the Depraved-heart mass murder killing of millions, to establish a base of FEAR within their individual and collective consciousness whereby they could and would be forced into the "vaccine only" path, induced to and compelled to participate in their own mass shootings with fast, cheap and dirty genetic engineering injections never, ever, shown to be safe or effective.

With sars-cov-2 came the activation of the long planned bioweapon countermeasure program designed to compel this "vaccine only" path. Prevention / N95 use was ruled out, suppressed from 2013 with no further additions to "our" meager, expiring national stockpile, no provisions would be forthcoming for a resilient, in-country, N95 supply chain.

From my reading, Mrna technology was developed as the fast and cheap sole choice for this program, without ever having been trialed to see if it could make a safe sars-cov "vaccine", after all attempts using conventional vaccine technology to make a sars-cov vaccine failed. They all made antibodies - they all failed because when the vaccinated animals were challenged with sars-cov virus they fared worse than the unvaccinated control group when so challenged. Once the Mrna technology was developed Moderna and BioNTech (to become Pfizer-BioNTech) had their versions on the shelf after failed attempts to use it to bring cancer treatments to the market. The attempts failed because they were unsafe. Mrna was in Truth fast, cheap and dirty. Never shown to be safe or effective.

Their ready plan to suppress all real treatment and push late stage use of remdesivir and "vaccines" was put into action at the W.H.O, in Jan 2020. "The US representative at this Jan 2020 "w.h.o." meeting was, fauci stand-in, Hilary Marston - Medical Officer and Policy Advisor National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases" with a big pharma "fixer" "McKinsey & Company and .. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation" employment background." Within days of obtaining the sars-cov-2 genetic sequence "Moderna" had made an injection that made antibodies. Contracts for warped speed mass manufacturing without quality testing requirements were let. In a "fast vaccine" discussion fauci said in 2019 testing would still be needed (at the suggestion that soon "vaccines" would be manufactured and sent directly to the public, without testing, in the form of a micro needle patch for the recipient to apply) (my note; testing would be needed for "for now" until "vaccines" are released without even farce human testing). So during the mass mis-manufacturing scale up, farce "vaccine testing" was set up to show a "safe and effective" result / "safe and effective" narrative. Timed and orchestrated to coincide with the time of the "vaccine" roll out.

"How do we prevent this from happening again?"

Border control , free passage out, quarantine on entry. Root out any "hidden, resilient, source pockets of infection" that are "seeding". Widespread knowledge enabling Personal Responsibility for Self Protection based on Real science and Real clinical experience. Which now says, and has been known and attempted to be noised abroad from March, 2020 - PREVENTION - pre exposure protection prior to entering "shared air" - first, low cost, simple to make at home, antiviral oral and nasal sprays and antiviral sprays or drops for eyes, then real N95 and eyeglasses, PREVENTION - post exposure prophylaxis protection including use of homemade antiviral nasal flush, antiviral oral and eye wash, antiviral sprays and antiviral nebulization, TREATMENT - available, unsuppressed free access to early treatment and prophylaxis, ready in hand to start at home upon first sign of symptoms and prophylaxis for the entire household when one person in the household develops symptoms. Understand and Choose, Keep D3 levels high, Yes, wash your hands with soap.

Expand full comment

The absolute perversion of reality is what has driven me nuts from the beginning.

We "anti-vaxxers" were announced as being anti-science and spreading mis- and dis-information, yet, even though their own numbers from their own scientists came up with the same conclusions we did, they still proclaimed "safe and effective"!

My opening sentence: "The absolute perversion of reality" was written intentionally.

Any mathematician instantly will recognize this formula: |-4| = 4

What this formula shows (in English) is: The Absolute Value of Negative Four Equals Four.

In other words, even though Big Pharma and Dr. Science KNEW the numbers showed negative, they lied and called the results positive.

Expand full comment

A percentage of transfected cells in EVERYONE jabbed is affected.

Jeff Childers of coffee and covid wrote 1/4 of cells, and Naked Emperor writer wrote that according to the study as he read it 8% of cells in everyone are affected.

Expand full comment

Here's the question I have, and call me stupid for asking it, but is this junk cumulative? As in, does it get worse and accumulate over time leading to worse and worse outcomes?

Expand full comment