Discussion about this post

User's avatar
JWM_IN_VA's avatar

Pay close attention to the arguments in the motion to dismiss.

Expand full comment
Aletheia.the.Younger's avatar

Are you aware, or is anybody aware, of any lawsuits for contamination that involve the Covid-19 countermeasures? Is the intent of this post to suggest that this is a path and methodology for future lawsuits? I believe that if it is to work, the defendents have to be the manufacturer and the administrator of the shot. The manufacturer would not be Pfizer. As Hedley Rees points out, Pfizer is just a front company, holding patents and providing advertising. DOD funded the manufacturing, ATI held the contract, Pfizer was a middle agent, but the manufacturers are "nonames" to most people. Those nonames would have to be cited. Where it would really get interesting is if the "safe and effective" pushers would be named as codefendents for providing misinformation that led to mandates or economic coercion to get the shot. The charge would be malfeasance or derelection of duty. Those pushers would be the state health departments, in addition to the administrators of the shot (failure to provide informed consent). What do you think?

Expand full comment
17 more comments...

No posts