The toxicity of carbon nanoparticles

https://particleandfibretoxicology.biomedcentral.com/track/pdf/10.1186/s12989-019-0299-z.pdf

By now, I am sure everyone knows that covid vaccines have nanotechnology to send the mRNA protein to targeted areas in the body.  We discussed in earlier posts about nanotechnology being used to transport chemo to tumors for localized treatment.  We discussed the nanotechnology sizes being varied, and that in come chemo drugs such as Doxyrubicin, the nanotechnology that was 80ng and smaller tended to cross the ovary follicle membrane and caused damage to maturing egg follicles.   The above paper discusses just how nasty the nanotechnology can be in the human body.

I do want to note before we dive in that nanoparticles are CARBON materials……and the green energy push is to REDUCE carbon….yet they use CARBON to put the covid mRNA into us……makes perfect sense.

These are the different types of nano materials.  They come in various shapes and sizes depending on what they are needed to do.

“In vitro models have been developed for cytotoxicity studies.  A number of studies evaluated the harmful effects of carbon nanoparticles on various cell types, and as the first-line of defence against foreign particles, macrophages were mostly studied. Previous studies reported various toxic effects of carbon nanomaterials, including ROS generation, DNA damage, lysosomal damage, mitochondrial dysfunction and eventual cell death via apoptosis or necrosis.  The different results of the cytotoxicity of carbon-based materials might be related to many factors, such as the differences in the physicochemical properties or structures of carbon nanomaterials, types of target cells and methods of particle dispersion.”

I included the tables so you can see what each type of nanotechnology shape and size does, and the effect they have on the human body.  Notice how they all target our immune system to create a response.

Some points of interest (because they do try to sell nanotechnology as a great way to kill the bad stuff but not hurt the good stuff).

The results showed that exposure to multiwalled carbon nanotubes aggravated airway inflammation and induced the generation of epithelium-derived innate cytokines compared with exposure to dust mites alone (looking at allergy meds with nanotechnology).  The treatment can’t be worse than the issue you are treating!

There is evidence that local exposure (airway exposure or intraperitoneal injection) induces not only local adverse effects, but also systematic inflammatory responses. Pharyngeal aspiration of nanoparticles caused an early increase in serum cytokines and inflammatory gene expression in serum. Eosinophils in blood and bronchial secretions consistently increased beyond 24 h, and after 28 days, systemic markers of immune function were increased.

At the beginning of research and development of any carbon nanomaterial, it is necessary to evaluate the potential toxic effects of the material and identify the physicochemical properties that are responsible for toxicity. Additionally, it is crucial to clarify the molecular mechanisms of carbon nanomaterial-induced cytotoxicity.

Catalytic metals are used during the manufacture of CNTs, and metallic impurities inevitably remain in CNTs. Numerous studies have proposed that residual catalytic metals induce oxidative stress, resulting in cell death.

Carbon nanomaterials have been found to interfere with assay components and read-out, causing inconsistent results concerning toxicity.

This paper came out in 2019.  It goes pretty deep into the different reactions the body has in response to carbon nanoparticles.  They definitely try to sell it as a good thing, not a bad technology.  Again….2019 appears again.  So many papers were published in 2019 about so many things that pertain to covid.  You really have to question if that was done intentionally to create a “pre-covid” narrative to divert risk analysis away from certain things in the “post-covid” era.