The survival of corona viruses in water
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0043135409000785
Keeping with the water theme……here is an interesting article from 2009. This discusses studies done about how long coronaviruses could live in water. The testing was done based on the hypothesis that if someone had a coronavirus, it could shed in their fecal matter, and theoretically spread via aerosols from flushing the toilet. Very similar to the hypothesis of how norovirus spreads so easily as a virus that aerosolized into the air via particles from human fluids.
Here is where it gets interesting. 😎
This study was done in CHAPEL HILL, and the University of North Carolina. (You know, that same place that gain of function studies on CORONAVIRUSES) was done. Remember, this is 2009. The study states that studying a coronavirus was difficult because it required a level 3 biohazard lab, so they used OTHER viruses to compare what a coronavirus may do in regards to how long it could live in water. “The two viruses chosen for study were transmissible gastroenteritis virus (TGEV), a diarrheal pathogen of swine and a member of the Group 1 coronaviruses, and mouse hepatitis virus (MHV), a respiratory and enteric pathogen of laboratory mice and a member of the Group 2 coronaviruses (Jackwood, 2006). The survival and persistence of these viruses was observed in reagent-grade water, lake water, and settled human sewage at two temperatures over a period of weeks to provide estimates of how long members of the coronavirus family, as potential surrogates for SARS-CoV, can remain infectious in these waters.”
So, how did they get the TGEV and the MHV virus for this experiment? Well, good ol Ralph Baric VOLUNTEERED to give them samples of those viruses for this experiment. Yes, THAT Ralph Baric. Fauci’s little sociopath partner in crime.
What were the results of this study? “This study observed the stability of coronaviruses in water and sewage over long periods of time, and quantified the kinetics of viral inactivation in these media. The coronaviruses studied were capable of remaining infectious in reagent-grade waters, natural environmental waters, and waters contaminated with human fecal waste (sewage) for periods of weeks. This long-term survival was seen at both low (4 °C) and ambient (25 °C) temperatures. In all water types, the titer of infectious virus declined more rapidly at 25 °C than at 4 °.
The final comment of the paper is most telling: “The persistence of coronaviruses in water observed in this study suggests that if SARS-CoV should reemerge in human populations, water contaminated with these viruses may continue to pose an exposure risk even after infected individuals are no longer present.” Well isn’t that interesting. I have questions. Why were they studying this to begin with? WHY did they need to know how long a coronavirus could live in WATER? And why was it necessary to know how long it lived in reagent grade water (that is distilled/deionized level water quality, the same as the water we drink in BOTTLED water). Why did they also test lake water and sewer water? What were they planning in 2009?
What do we know from this article? Back in 2009, Ralph Baric, UNC, and a team of researchers decided to find out how long a coronavirus could live in water. They were particularly concerned with how long coronavirus could live in not only lake and sewer water, but also in distilled water, comparable to the bottled water we all drink in mass quantities. They were also funded by the CDC to do this experiment.
So taking yesterday into account, when many small water companies were gobbled up by the big guys. We have a growing water monopoly going on. What if……and this is a big what if……..what if they were capable of putting coronaviruses into our water supply? We already know it survives for 6 weeks or longer in all types of water. What did we have a big run on in 2020 besides toilet paper? Bottled water. What if, they were capable of contaminating our water supply in more ways than one? What if……they were able to contaminate bottled AND tap water? What if the traditional water filters people use on the refrigerator wasn’t capable of filtering out a virus? A lot of what-if’s and hypotheticals here, but I keep going back to “why was this study done in 2009”? It really served no purpose to study this. Unless they needed to know the shelf life of a virus in the water supply.
You are obviously extremely paranoid. Hasn’t history proven to you that Government and it’s fanatical interests exist only to ensure the prosperity health and well being of the general population?
Why indeed are our universities studying infectious disease warfare techniques? Funded by Pharma and big Gov. Why are Global investment houses gobbling up the residential real estate and farmland across the US? Why is our entire food industry controlled by Chemical companies? Why are there huge hazy layers of jetstreams coalescing into thin grey clouds that blanket the entire sky for days? Why is my quadruple jabbed,pilates,spin class marathon running organic food eating sister sick?All Of The Time.
Were we born this naïve?
Impossible, the human race would have never made it this far.
Wow. I recall Dr. Bryan Ardis getting trashed for saying that they spread covid through the water supply. I wonder if the gain-of-purity infectious clones, described by JJ Couey, are able to survive for the length of time called out in the article. When you look at the epicenters, like NYC, and read "Undercover Epicenter Nurse" - it is straightforward to see how they used PCR to test perfectly healthy people and get them intubated and on an IV drip - in order to collect the "incentive" money. It's murder. It's eugenics. We are STILL under EUA - why? The legal structure protects the criminals and 98% of people are complicit. It is a repeat of 1930's Germany. Peace. :-)