The Pfizer “real time” Clinical Trial Data: The information they FOUGHT to have hidden from the public and did not want you to see for 55-75 years.

I am starting this one with posting the link to this Pfizer data. Each of you should read through it and by all means, verify for yourself that what I am reporting here is accurate. https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf

The clinical data we are reviewing here is a misnomer: this is not data done back in mid 2020 when they were actually doing pre-launch clinical trials ON the vaccine. This data is “REAL TIME DATA” that was gathered from the vaccine being EUA approved for use, and we went to town vaccinating the global population. So this is real world people data who received the vaccine during the global vaccine campaign. An important detail to remember here, is that EUA essentially IS a clinical trial, and will be until sometime in 2023-2025. So yes. EVERY PERSON who received a covid vaccine, no matter the brand, is actually a participant in a real time clinical trial.

When the public requested they release the “real time” clinical trial data for the covid vaccine, Pfizer hem hawed about it and did not want to release it. Pfizer’s legal team went to court and requested a 55 year delay and then a 75 year delay on the release of that information.  Why?  What did they want kept under lock and key for so long that most of the people alive today would be dead before the data was revealed?  Pfizer was sued and they lost their court case request to keep the clinical trial data buried;   it was ordered by a judge that all 500,000 pages of clinical trial data be released.  And they have 10-12 months to do that.  The first real world data from the initial wave of public vaccinations clinical trial data release occurred a few weeks ago.  To say it was interesting would be an understatement.

First, this is real world vaccine trial data from December 1, 2020 thru February 28, 2021.  So a 90 day period.  Covid vaccines did not launch in the United States until around December 8th, 2020.  In this first 90 day window, we do not know how many vaccines were given.  They redacted that information.  Which already smells funny.  Because you cannot assess true risk if you do not even know HOW many vaccines were given.  Moving on……we know that out of “unknown vaccine doses given”, there were 42,086 patients with adverse events reported, with 158,893 total adverse effects reported.  Some people had multiple issues in their adverse event report. 

In this second portion, you can see the breakdown of genders affected, as well as age group.  Notice that 30-50 age group? They had the highest incidence of adverse event reporting with over 13,000.  Hmmm…..perhaps that ties in to that excess mortality we discussed for a few days.  Weren’t we supposed to be vaccinating the elderly and high risk in this time period?  Wait…..no, the first group to receive most Pfizer vaccines was HEALTHCARE EMPLOYEES!!!  THEN came the elderly.  How many healthcare workers are vaccine injured?  How many healthcare employees are in that 31-50 age group?  A LOT.  Important to note here, that at the time of the February 28th reporting period,  over 11,000 people had not recovered from their adverse event yet.  1223 people had died.  And 9400 people were totally unaccounted for in terms of recovery from adverse event. This, my friends, is one sloppy sloppy trial.  I have never, in my life, heard of an EUA trial medication having 1223 deaths in 90 days and THAT DRUG REMAINED ON THE MARKET.  It just flat out does NOT happen.  Except for a Pfizer covid vaccine.  Remember……they did not want you to see this for 55-75 years.  Moving on……

This next table is also interesting.  These are side effects reported in more than 2% of cases.  Tachycardia is concerning.  On a personal note, I have TWO close friends who have been chronically tachycardic and are still on medications to lower their heart rate, and both are post Pfizer vaccine. Another has cardiomyopathy post vaccine.   And none were reported as a vaccine side effect.  So, the adverse event data is missing three reports that I personally know of.  Which leads to how accurate IS this data in terms of did it TRULY CAPTURE all adverse events?  No.  It did not.

This is interesting.  2201 people reported the drug was “ineffective”, and another 1947 caught covid?  I am sure this will be passed off as “well they were not 2 weeks post second vaccine”.  I would argue that if THAT is the criteria, then a case of covid as a vaccine adverse effect would not be reported here UNLESS the recipient was 2+ weeks post second vaccine.  That is the schematic Pfizer/TNI mainstream media “sold” us if a vaccinated person caught covid shortly after a vaccine.  Remember when they told us injection site pain, redness, and swelling were  the most “common and mild side effects”?  Well, then please explain to me how all of those were less in occurrence than dizziness, which suggests a possible neurological or cardiac issue?  And redness and swelling came in much lower than short of breath, cough, and body rash?  What are the most common side effects/adverse effects again?

Among the “important identified risks, note that ANAPHYLAXIS is listed first?  Vaccine associated enhanced disease? Vaccine associated enhanced respiratory disease? That means that the vaccine could make you SICKER IF YOU CATCH COVID.  With worse respiratory symptoms and consequences.  But hold on……didn’t the vaccine “prevent you from serious illness and death?” Remember that narrative from early to mid 2021?  HOW DID THEY REPORT THAT when they KNEW in FEBRUARY 2021 that ENHANCED DISEASE DUE TO VACCINE WAS AN AREA OF CONCERN? Oh……and MISSING information?  EFFECTS OF THE VACCINE IN PREGNANCY AND LACTATION.  But dear lord, HOW MANY pregnant women were encouraged to get this vaccine?  With ZERO data to back it up?  Again, never in my life have I ever seen a medication promoted and encouraged in a PREGNANT OR LACTATING WOMAN without extensive years long trial data to support it.  EVER.  You do not give that population an untested med.

The pregnant women portion of this really bothers me on a visceral level.  We DO NOT KNOW what this vaccine can do to pregnant women.  We did not study it.  In the original Pfizer vaccine clinical trial in the summer of 2020, pregnant and lactating women were excluded from the trial.  ALL trial participants had to be on birth control.  And there was to be no “exchange of sexual fluids” for 30 days post each vaccine during the trial.  So yes, we know that pregnant and lactating women were definitely not studied in the original summer 2020 volunteer pre-market trials.  In fact, avoiding pregnancy was a CRITERIA of trial participation.  But yes, by all means, when the vaccine rolled out to the public, go start vaccinating them blindly with zero data to support that action.  In this report, 270 pregnant women reported adverse effects.  23 babies died via spontaneous abortion. 2 intrauterine death (later term baby), 2 preterm birth with death of baby. My math says that is 27 dead babies post vaccine.  And that is only those reported!!! Because, wait for it…..out of the 270 women who reported an adverse event, 238 of those cases were never followed up on!!!!!  Out of the 38 cases followed up on, that is 27 dead babies.  Absolutely 100% unacceptable.  On so many levels.

Next at bat was breastfed babies to vaccinated mothers.  133 reported exposure to the vaccine while breastfeeding their infant.  17 of those babies had an adverse effect such as rash, diarrhea, irritability, and insomnia.  This means that 12.7% of breastfed babies exposed to a mother who had vaccinated had an adverse event.

In other categories such as heart attack, tachycardia, cardiac failure, cardiomyopathy, and postural orthostatic hypotension, 1403 reports.  70 people reported liver complications including acute liver failure.  932 reported blood disorders such as leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, and neutropenia.  What does this mean?  Your clotting and white blood cells are not working right.  449 cases of facial paralysis or Bell’s palsy.  1050 cases of autoimmune disorder and or cytokine storm.  3600 reported cases of new onset rheumatoid arthritis, chronic fatigue syndrome, and neuropathy.  501 cases of Guillian Barre, meningitis, ataxia, and fibromyalgia.  8152 cases of herpes viral infections, positive test for MERS (middle eastern respiratory syndrome), and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome.  69 cases of acute kidney injury.  151 cases of pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis.  275 cases of stroke and sinus thrombosis.  2792 cases of “medication error” with the vaccine, resulting in 7 fatalities.

Make sure you check out the NINE PAGES of adverse events or AESI’s associated with the Pfizer vaccine. They are the last 9 pages in the link below.

I am including the same link as I did at the start of this post, because by now, I am sure you will want to see these data numbers for yourself. https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf

Remember this.  PFIZER KNEW.  This is data that is already 13 months old. Based on the data here, 1223 deaths out of 42,000 people who reported adverse events to the vaccine equals 3% OF THE ADVERSE EVENT REPORT PEOPLE DIED. Compare that to the 0.7% death rate of having a covid infection! We knew in February of 2021 that the vaccine had big problems. And that no, it was not safer to take this vaccine than it was to catch covid. It is appalling that the general public was just given this data in February 2022.  They could have stopped this whole thing with the safety signals this report shows.  ANY drug would have been stopped and taken off the market if these safety issues had been reported.  Why did this vaccine not get pulled?  Numerous doctors, including Dr. Malone and Dr. McCullough, have reported that they saw safety concerns as early as February 2021 in patients they treated and reports they read from other doctors, especially cardiologists and neurologists.  And both wondered why this vaccine was not pulled by March 2021.  We have no idea how many vaccines were given in this time frame. Because Pfizer redacted that data.  Think about this: if the number of vaccines given was super high, wouldn’t they WANT us to know that because it would dilute out the severity of case numbers in these adverse events reported?  How many freshly vaccinated people died or had an injury that was never reported?  How many physicians REFUSE to acknowledge that an adverse event was due to a covid vaccine?  Especially in the early days of the vaccine administration.  Did physicians know this safety data?  Were patients truly giving informed consent for a vaccine if they had no idea what it was doing to people?   Emergency Use Authorization protection from liability only holds up IF they TRULY did not know there was a safety issue.  This documentation shows they did know.  What will the other 490,000 pages of trial data show?  I will update that as the data rolls out. Also……shouldn’t a stunning report such as this be breaking headline news on every news network?  Oh yeah, that’s right, the TNI is squashing that group that asks questions and actively did their part to never ever report this Pfizer adverse event data.  You can’t even post it on social media without a covid warning label, or they block your post as “misinformation”.  HOW IS PFIZER’S DATA DIRECTLY FROM THEM MISINFORMATION??!?  It is not.

Some of you may be thinking “whew, I am glad that I/my family/my friends got the Moderna vaccine.  Well, tomorrow’s post reviews Moderna.  And that one may be even more shocking than this data set.