Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Twink's avatar

One of the most shocking results of this Plandemic for me was to totally lose faith in the doctors I had trusted, to scrutinize each one with a critical eye and re-assess my opinions of them. I now see my GP as a pusher of prescriptions and vaccines, not limited to just the mRNA, and also as a spy for the federal government through the ObamaCare Annual Wellness Visit. It feels like paranoia, but I don’t trust that questionnaire. The USA’s medical profession and organizations have shifted towards the enemy category for many Americans. Frontline Doctors and other “rogue” doctors such as Peter McCullough who think for themselves are the anomaly and the heroes of the day.

Expand full comment
Aletheia.the.Younger's avatar

Having worked as a hospital system IT administrator, I have seen the influence drug companies have behind doors. Drug Companies (dcs) give free lunches to all Dr's and staff every working day. They give free samples. My brother was out "on the road" in his airplane or on a private jet pitching drug products. He was a principal in UNCs Urology department. He would get paid somewhere between $1500 and $3000 for each 1 hour presentation, in addition to expenses and travel time coverage.

Your article hit home to me not only for being on the money but that doctors themselves were being in the money from the dcs to pedal their products, whether through direct supply or by perks. I believe the perks and cash has to stop. Cold stop.

There is so much abuse and inappropriate influence in the way health professionals are given information and access to product.

Furthermore, at the CDC/FDA level, as well as at the professional level, such as the AMA, the standard protocols developed for disease diagnosis and management are full of nefarious drug company influence (and, in the past couple dozen years, political influence). Though it might cost the state more, all states should have the equivalent of COC and FDA departments. Drug information that flows to doctors should be through these organizations, not the drug companies. Protocols should be reviewed and changed where appropriate, given the population characteristics of the state. Both drugs and protocols should be tracked in real time for effectiveness and adverse events.

I don't know how this can be implemented in such a way that it will not recreate the deep state at the State Level. Perhaps committee members should have a limited appointment. There has to be oversight over these committees. (Committees of committees,, ugh!) As I have recommended, having a Surgeon General post would elevate accountability above the deep state level. Only 4 or 5 states have such a post. (Florida is the most notable example.)

I have already outlined bills for these ideas to my own legislature, except for shutting down direct contact and influence between the dcs and the medical professionals. In your opinion, does this have any merit?

Expand full comment
14 more comments...

No posts