Part 3: The Nuremberg Code and its application towards the covid vaccine.
There are many people around the world who have suggested that the covid vaccine may be a violation of the Nuremberg Code. Remember here, you must apply ALL 10 sections for something to be deemed within the accordance of the code. Violation in one area is a violation of the code, with the penalty being a tribunal trial for violation of the violated article. *point of interesting note here: when I did a random search of “violation of Nuremberg code”, a list of no fewer than 20 articles, from the mainstream media like Bloomberg, Reuters, AP, BBC, etc, all yelling from the rooftops that covid vaccines are NOT a violation of the Nuremberg code. That alone should probably scare most of us. If they say its not, it usually is. If they say something is, it usually isn’t. Trusted News Initiative and all. Scheisters.
The 10 points of the Nuremberg Code: https://www.ushmm.org/information/exhibitions/online-exhibitions/special-focus/doctors-trial/nuremberg-code#Permissible
1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.
This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent, able to exercise free power of choice, without any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion. Persons should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. Before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment. The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.
*This one is concerning. When a company/employer/government/etc MANDATES a covid vaccine, either jab or no job, are you able to exercise free power of choice? Was force really not used? Wasn’t fraud and deceit used because the efficacy of the covid vaccine kept changing from “you will never get covid” to “well you may get it but you won’t be in the hospital” then to “well you may be hospitalized but not the ICU or dead” to then “well yes, you can die after post vax covid”. So that would meet fraud and deceit. Government mandates would be over-reaching and coercive, no jab no job. Also, no trial data was given about the NEGATIVE effects of the vaccine, so consent cannot be given free and clear. Remember, Pfizer hid that data until March 2022. We still haven’t seen 80% OF THAT DATA YET.
2. The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature. *Also concerning. Are the covid vaccine results fruitful? Has it done what we were told it would do? Was it really for the good of society if the vaccine did not perform as “sold” by the MSM and the CDC and Fauci? Was it truly necessary with a 99% covid virus survival rate? What about instead of a vaccine we TREAT the virus with alternative medication early treatments? You know, the devils lettuce meds we aren’t allowed to talk about? Hydroxychloroquine? Ivermectin? Fluvoxamine? Vitamin D/C/Zinc/C? Budesonide? Histamine 2 blockers? Early implementation of these options may have rendered the need to be vaccinated as moot. Also, we now know (per Pfizer) that natural immunity to the virus is superior to the vaccine in terms of efficacy.
3. The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment. *Remember the Wistar Rat study in the Pfizer results a week ago? 48 hours of animal trial data? Showing the vaccine did not stay in the muscle as we were told? The suspicion that the animal control trial was ended at 48 hours with no further data because we are not certain the Wistar Rats survived beyond 48 hours? Did the vaccine prevent more deaths than the natural history of the disease in 2020? No. More deaths occurred in 2021 than in 2020 from “covid”.
4. The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury. *Maybe we should ask the vaccine injured if they believe their covid vaccine avoided all physical and mental suffering and injury. I bet I know what their answer is.
5. No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects. *We know from the Pfizer data with 42,000+ people with 153,000+ adverse reactions, where 1223 people died post vaccine from December 1, 2020 to February 28th, 2021. So no, you cannot believe that death or disabling injury will not occur. We already knew it was happening.
6. The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment. *Again. Covid was a virus with a 99% survival rate. This was not Ebola with a 90% death rate. The vaccine was not necessary for most that received it.
7. Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death. *Given that hospitals will not even honestly admit your vaccine injury IS a vaccine injury, I am doubtful we have a “facility” to “protect” a vaccine injured person, nor do we have a “safe place” for newly vaccinated people to “convalesce” if needed.
8. The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment. *I am guessing the CVS pharmacist is not the scientifically highest degree of skilled person to be administering this vaccine. While in healthcare, they are not patient care trained whatsoever.
9. During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible. *So try getting 1 covid vaccine but not the 2nd or the booster if your job required it and see if they let you exercise your right to Liberty and end the experiment. You can, but you will lose your job.
10. During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probably cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject. *This is the big one. PFIZER KNEW IN FEBRUARY 2021 THAT THIS VACCINE WAS DANGEROUS. It should have been terminated at that point! Oh no, we just hired 1800 people to answer adverse event reports and we kept on jabbing. Continuing to vaccinate has led to NUMEROUS VACCINE INJURIES AND DEATH since February, 2021. Tens of thousands. More likely hundreds of thousands. Maybe even approaching the millions at this point. And now they are selling the 4th booster. And vaccines for 6mo-5 year olds.
So, in my estimation, does the covid vaccine violate Nuremberg Code? Yes. It does. On all 10 counts. Some more significantly than others. I can only hope that someday, those who violated these ethical research codes are held accountable for it.