Discussion about this post

User's avatar
MDJD's avatar

The insanity of the last few years starts to make sense. Only military commanders would be so ruthless, authoritarian, and sociopathic to lock down populations, force them to wear masks, and inject them with untested bioweapons in callous disregard for the suffering and death it caused. They tested and perfected their warfare techniques against their own populations which is a war crime.

Expand full comment
Paving the Way's avatar

This is interesting new information. One important aspect is that the government names things in order to classify them so as to determine how they can manage them or use them. Words have legal ramifications for the government. Thus, calling this program a bioweapon prototype EUA program allowed the government to do things, as you say, but it does not necessarily mean they deliberately unleashed a bioweapon on the people of the world. I believe Trump made this a DOD program so the feds could bypass regulatory hurdles and have complete command and control over the procedures. Trump rightly understands our government is a bureaucratic behemoth that cannot do anything quickly. He needs to explain his motivation but also admit that it turned out to be a disaster.

I believe the original release came from the biosecurity/bioweapon program but had it ever got to the stage that it was a military asset (aggressive weapon)? I doubt it. The response appears to be a countermeasure, which I believe means in this case a specific product of gene engineering that was developed in response to another gene-edited germ that was intended to mitigate the (harmful) effects of that germ. I am using the word germ because I do not know what other word to use.

Everyone keeps saying the central bankers and the elite intellectuals at WEF, Gates etc. want to depopulate the planet and I am sure they do, but there is no causal connection established yet, nor command and control identified between that desire and this initial release or the countermeasure. When those connections are identified I will update my theory.

I also like the new distinction you are drawing between Moderna and Pfizer. Very interesting. Attorney Siri told us the VSAFE data he sued to get from the government show the harms caused by the Moderna shot were greater than the harms associated with the Pfizer shot. They also apparently had a higher concentration of MRNA in their product than Pfizer. That seems strange.

What I get from Latypova and Watt is that they recognize our federal government is completely criminal, far beyond incompetent. The true popular revolution starts there. These current inhabitants in the Executive Branch are essentially a crime syndicate. We need an emergency intervention to eject them because they are dangerously deluded and criminally committed. I would like to see all good guys speaking with one voice on this because they are killing us and have us on the verge of war.

Expand full comment
24 more comments...

No posts