***More Pfizer Updates from their July data drop; what is up with the RSV trial on pregnant women and older women???

https://pdata0916.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/pdocs/070122/125742_S2_M5_5354_wi235284-protocol.pdf

This one is curious.  They are investigating RSV and other respiratory illnesses in PREGNANT WOMEN and older women.  What makes this interesting is that the study mentions “season 3” as the winter of 2020-2021, so this RSV study was going on PRIOR to covid, as this data is dated March 2021.  This study was being done by Pfizer at Emory University in Atlanta, Georgia.  So whatever study they WERE doing related to RSV ended up getting the covid vaccine wrapped up into it in “season 3” of the study. Also of relevant information: Pfizer AND Moderna have been looking at a mRNA vaccine for RSV.  The problem here is that RSV is a much bigger concern for babies than it is for adults, so I am speculating that they are tracking data on adult women, pregnant women, to see of a mRNA vaccine will work before giving it to babies…….and they are looking at antibody transfer across the placenta in pregnant women. So I have to wonder…….had they launched a trial RSV vaccine for women PRIOR to covid? From what I understand, the mRNA technology is now being looked at for multiple things, covid was the first so we would buy into a new “universal mRNA vaccine platform”. What was this study they were doing that they ended up tying the Pfizer vaccine INTO?

This is their statement from page 9:

They were also most interested in the covid vaccination status of these pregnant women.  What happened with placenta cross over? They ALREADY DISCUSSED that vaccination for 6 month olds “wasn’t likely in the near future”, so hey, lets see how we can get the spike protein into the fetus in-utero. They wanted to study covid vaxxed pregnant women.  But again, I have a strong hunch this study was not focused on mom’s benefit, they wanted to see how much the vaccine crossed into the placenta.  The page before this discussed banking baby cord blood at birth to study the antibodies. Also important to note, cord blood. Cord blood is rich in stem cells, many people will bank their child’s cord blood to use it to treat a major illness down the road such as cancer where you need stem cell treatment. Also……infant cord blood stem cells go for big money. WHAT ELSE WAS PFIZER DOING WITH INFANT CORD BLOOD? This study gave Pfizer consent to each of these mothers infants cord blood. This portion of this study also basically says “well the Pfizer trial may say that covid vaccination in pregnant women isn’t suggested, buuuuuuuttttttt, who are we to stop that if there is high community transmission and/or the woman works in healthcare. That alone is a violation of the Pfizer trial exclusion criteria. Yet again. Pregnant women. Not supposed to be getting this poke poke. They found a way around it by voluntary status in ANOTHER study that covid was added to. Pfizer, you all stink!

Here is the discussion of using cord blood to look for antibodies in baby post vaccine

So why is this discussed as RSV and not primarily covid?  Why are they looking at the covid vaccine outcomes when RSV is a totally separate illness????  Covid is NOT RSV. RSV is NOT COVID.   Oh yes, of course, this is really all about the covid vaccine. Dare I say, was this study launched because they already KNEW that covid was on its way and the RSV front was just that….a front…..and they easily slipped the covid addition into it? Most likely.

Of further interest, they discuss that due to “lack of funding and PPE resources”, that informed consent is being changed.  They wanted a waiver for informed consent to review their medical records.  Oral consent was deemed ok, and a signature “was ok but no signature was ok too”.  So we know the data coming out of THIS year 3 paperwork is different, because they modified the way they did the trial from the previous 2 seasons.  Note, the trial was started the winter that covid arrived and 1 year before the covid vaccine.  Covid and the covid vaccine got sucked up into this trial.  Again……maybe it was designed that way all along.  Launched an RSV trial prior to covid, with the plan to vacuum up women and covid vaccine studies into it.

So what I want to see is WHAT WAS DONE SEASON 1&2? What was this study? What was being monitored and tested on these women? Was it just chart review and sputum samples? Why combine two totally different populations? Pregnant women AND older adults? I want to see what study was hijacked by a change of plan with the covid vaccine.

This does not pass the sniff test. What were fetal outcomes of pregnant women who had the Pfizer vaccine? How much infant cord blood did Pfizer “steal” in the name of voluntary research for the rich stem cells inside of it? These women willingly gave that to Pfizer! I doubt any of this was explained to these moms, and we already know from above they they loosened up the informed consent requirements. I hope we see that infant/mom data soon. Also, how many women were in this study? Before AND after they added covid and the vaccine to the mix. Because at this point we were still told pregnant women and breastfeeding women were NOT to be in the trials……..this document and trial is super weird.