This is going to be a two article post to help lay the foundation for what was found. For starters:
I follow this guy closely, and he is fighting hard for vaccines to stop, for transparency on what is in the vials, etc. He has given up everything to find the truth. He is one of the good ones. So check out what he discovered.
He was able to get ahold of a batch of Pfizer “vaccine” vials.
“We surveyed 8 vials from the same lot of Pfizer monovalent mRNA vaccines (lot # FL8095) using qPCR and RT-qPCR. These vials were unopened but dated 9/21 on the label manufacturer label and 3/4/22 was hand written on the top of the vaccine box.”
Conclusions
8/8 monovalent vaccines sourced from a single case from a single lot of Pfizer monovalent vaccines all fail the EMA specification of 3030:1 RNA:DNA (330ng/mg DNA/RNA). They are over the limit by an order of magnitude (18-70 fold). The DNA contamination is very consistent and the vial to vial ratio of RNA:DNA is very consistent within the same lot of monovalent vaccines. Further sequencing is underway to evaluate the 72bp heteroplasmic indel in the SV40 promoter of the vector. This was detected in the Pfizer bivalent vaccines.
What makes this concerning is that DNA in these vaccines are contaminants, not something that should be in there in any large quantity. The fact that these Pfizer vaccines had 18-70 fold HIGHER amounts of DNA in them is very concerning. That would be considered a biological contaminant and risk to the recipient.
See this article: https://cogforlife.org/FDApowerpointDNA.pdf
So the question now becomes……….how many vaccine lots had 18-70 fold higher levels of DNA contaminants in them? What kind of health issues are those people having? We know these contaminants occurred in both the original vax and the omicron bivalent booster. We know the dangers of these contaminants, and it would be a fair assessment to say that the turbo cancer and illnesses we see in people may be related to the DNA contaminants in the arm darts. Did some of the lots have even higher amounts than the ones tested here? Possible. This goes back to yesterday’s cell senescent/cell death issue. If high doses of DNA are introduced as contaminants, and they integrate into the nucleus of the DNA into our genome, what kind of mayhem are they creating? Is the DNA contaminant responsible for the turbo cancers and waning immune systems that people have?
I will update as we learn more about the DNA contaminant story.
Thanks Jennifer. I have been following the DNA contamination story via Kevin and Sasha Latypova's Stacks. Kevin ( Anandamide ) is a sequencing genius. I think there are many mechanisms for injury from the shots - they are literally rubbish! A very important point is that they were not required to be anything but rubbish! See Katherine Watt's work. The shots are classified as "countermeasures" - the government recognized this recently when they dismissed the Brooke Jackson case - There were NO clinical trials. Thanks for always publishing the truth! Peace. :-)
I know of two women, my peers in mid fifties, parents of adult children my own kids grew up with, who both were living well with their cancer diagnosis . Solid remission in one case and no to slow progression in the other. Both women were cult devotees and happily lined up for the jabs. Both dead from metastasized illness within 3 months.