There were two big ballot decisions in Wisconsin on April Fools Day. One, voting to codify into the state law that voter ID is required to vote. Second, they elected a new state Supreme Court member. If the liberal candidate won, the liberal team would have a majority.
A couple of interesting points: the liberal candidate has been vehemently opposed to voter ID laws in the state of Wisconsin.
When early voter counts came in, the people voted overwhelmingly YES to wanting voter ID laws put into state law. So by default, you would expect those same voters to vote for the conservative Supreme Court member, right? Why would they vote yes to something the liberal candidate clearly did not support? It would be like voting yes to making Coke the state drink, then voting for Pepsi to be the only soda advertised in the state.
Have a look at the results:
Overwhelming majority even with 53% of the vote in, voter ID is a solid yes.
Yet they flipped on the Supreme Court member? Look at the green counties (yes voter ID) that are blue (yes Susan Crawford, the option who is ANTI voter ID).
It defies logic…….and begs the question if there was any tampering done. The ramifications of the Supreme Court member are the ability to redistrict the state and add house seats, changing the national political landscape.
Not making assumptions…….but there are questions here.
Cheaters gonna cheat.
Especially, when it means screwing over the president.
As Stalin said: It matters not who vote or how. What matters is who counts the votes, and how. Or something like that. Once they’ve killed us the votes will all go their way.