BOOM goes the Vaccine is safe narrative……per Harvard study, the vaccine is more dangerous than the virus itself.
Remember that pesky medical ethics part that said the cure cannot be worse than the virus? Well.
“As boosters that have not been tested on humans are being rolled out across the country, a new study indicates that the jab is far more dangerous than COVID-19 itself. And the CDC has provided false information regarding their tracking of adverse events linked to the vaccines.”
A new study conducted by scientists from Harvard and Johns Hopkins, currently in pre-print, reveals that the COVID-19 vaccines were up to 98 times worse than the virus itself. The study is critical of the booster requirement for American university students, stating in the abstract: “Using CDC and sponsor-reported adverse event data, we find that booster mandates may cause a net expected harm: per COVID-19 hospitalisation prevented in previously uninfected young adults, we anticipate 18 to 98 serious adverse events, including 1.7 to 3.0 booster-associated myocarditis cases in males, and 1,373 to 3,234 cases of grade ≥3 reactogenicity which interferes with daily activities.”
Here is that study: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4206070
This study looks at 5 ethical harms to vaccine mandates at college universities. Given the high prevalence of post-infection immunity, this risk-benefit profile is even less favourable. University booster mandates are unethical because: 1) no formal risk-benefit assessment exists for this age group; 2) vaccine mandates may result in a net expected harm to individual young people; 3) mandates are not proportionate: expected harms are not outweighed by public health benefits given the modest and transient effectiveness of vaccines against transmission; 4) US mandates violate the reciprocity principle because rare serious vaccine-related harms will not be reliably compensated due to gaps in current vaccine injury schemes; and 5) mandates create wider social harms. We consider counter-arguments such as a desire for socialisation and safety and show that such arguments lack scientific and/or ethical support. Finally, we discuss the relevance of our analysis for current 2-dose COVID-19 vaccine mandates in North America.
This study goes into great depth to discuss that the majority of the population has had covid. With the case of Omicron, vaccination status made little to no difference in prevention of contracting or spreading the virus. The under age 40 age group has very nominal risk of hospitalization with covid versus a vaccine side effect.
The tide is beginning to turn kids.
I sure hope you're right, Doctor. I used to work for a subsidiary of Harvard...I knew when they went along with the snot pouch "mandates" that "mandatory" needles were on their way. I said "No" way early to the pouches, giving up not only my job, but my career.
I love when you ask someone in October of 2022…
“Hey, yeah. I want an updated answer from you. You still a firm believer in Mandated Vaccines?”
Usually ends with an answer of silence or a quickly skipped subject.