ASIA: autoimmune/inflammatory syndrome due to vaccine ADJUVANTS.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1568997223000216#:~:text=Clinical%20features%20of%20the%20autoimmune,%2C%20and%2For%20vascular%20manifestations
We are finally discussing the dangers of adjuvants in vaccines. This paper is terrific. It goes through each common vaccine adjuvant and lists out the physical health side effects associated with them.
**keep this in mind when reading this paper: EVERY SINGLE VACCINE ON THE MARKET has never been placebo tested. If a vaccine was tested for safety, the PLACEBO group received THE ADJUVANTS, not saline. This was done to hide negative vaccine effects. Muddied up the water big time. If we tested against a saline injection, the vaccine group numbers would be drastically different.
Anyone still doubt that vaccines are one of the leading cause of numerous chronic health issues in our bodies?
OK. I'll admit from the get-go I simply scanned this as it's extremely anal and I've made my conclusions from simply reading the highlights and the abstract and glancing at the support. The support was enough to know these guys did an excellent job backing up their presentation. In other words, I did a quick review, not an audit.
That said, the Overseer in me immediately saw THREE scenarios:
1) The tested "vaccine", i.e. the ITEM
2) The tested ITEM with only adjuvants - i.e. WITHOUT the ITEM, adjuvants only
3) The placebo
actually, there is #4, the CONTROL group, but we can destroy them without #4.
You show ANY normal Fourth Grader the raw numbers of these three tests and they will immediately be able to sort them in order of importance. And one might even question why isn't this just #1 vs #3.
The problem is: we now understand (from the steep learning curve of 2020-2) that the testers
first, are reticent to give raw data.
Second, we found they 'exclude' some raw data, i.e. falsify the test.
Thirdly, they compare things which are not comparable, e.g. #1 and #2 without #3. Remember, they never (willingly or ever) give us the #2 data!
My big issue is: HOW CAN WE EVEN ATTEMPT TO BROACH THIS SUBJECT TO THE MINDS THAT ARE RUSTED SHUT?????
I'm actively entertaining a hypothesis that one of the symptoms of post-jab syndrome is blindness to ANY comments or words which do not validate their faithful fervor in the introduction of material into their bodies (or their children) by artificial methods.
I do not make this hypothesis lightly. My wife, children, her entire side of relations are inimical to the very thought there might be something rotting in Denmark and I live with them.
Fortunately, I have us "deniers" on the internet and 4 of my 6 siblings solidly on the side of critical thought and analysis.
I don't doubt that at all. Bobby Kennedy's book is excellent on this topic. No randomized, BLINDED, clinical trials for vaccines. Yet we know that is the gold standard of truth. If vaccines receive approval without randomized trials, that tells me they are hiding some very important information. Remember, a very sick populace is good for business if you work in healthcare. BTW: that used to be the opposite. The primary goal of healthcare professionals was patient QOL. That seems to have fallen by the wayside for many (most) healthcare decision makers.