A “cautionary” tale of the covid 19 vaccines

https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2215780

This NEJM article goes through the history of the deployment of the vaccines and their boosters.  The end of the article is what is most interesting.

On October 24, 2022, David Ho and colleagues released the results of a study examining levels of neutralizing antibodies against BA.4 and BA.5 after receipt of a monovalent or bivalent booster dose. They found “no significant difference in neutralization of any SARS-CoV-2 variant,” including BA.4 and BA.5, between the two groups. One day later, Dan Barouch and colleagues released the results of a similar study, finding that “BA.5 [neutralizing-antibody] titers were comparable following monovalent and bivalent mRNA boosters.” Barouch and colleagues also noted no appreciable differences in CD4+ or CD8+ T-cell responses between participants in the monovalent-booster group and those in the bivalent-booster group. Neither research group found the bivalent boosters to elicit superior immune responses. The results are now published in the Journal.

The article goes on to state the following: What lessons can be learned from our experience with bivalent vaccines?  Fortunately, SARS-CoV-2 variants haven’t evolved to resist the protection against severe disease offered by vaccination or previous infection.  (I would delete the “by vaccination” here and leave it at previous infection.  But at least they DO acknowledge that previous infection does indeed create N antibodies that do protect you from catching covid or severity of disease).  A year ago they would have denied that in any printed article.

Then they said this:  In the meantime, I believe we should stop trying to prevent all symptomatic infections in healthy, young people by boosting them with vaccines containing mRNA from strains that might disappear a few months later.  Is this the call to action to stop boosting with these trash injections?  Sure smells like it.

In addition to this study, Fox put an article out today as well: https://www.foxnews.com/health/cdc-identifies-possible-safety-concern-certain-people-receiving-covid-vaccines

The Fox article claims that there were no safety signals with the Moderna vaccine but states that the Omicron bivalent Pfizer booster has increased the risk for ischemic stroke in people age 65 and older.  They then quickly backtrack and say there will be no change in protocol, just “more monitoring” to determine if that booster was the cause.  Lord have mercy.  Pull the plug on this damn injection.

Here is the video of the breaking news from the CDC: https://rumble.com/v25c8tv-breaking-cdc-to-investigate-link-between-strokes-and-covid-19-vaccines.html

As you all know who have been following along here, we discussed the new bivalent vaccine in September 2022 when it first came out, that it was not a great idea, it would be useless within 6 weeks, and other “variants” (or whatever they are) would render BA 4/5 obsolete by Halloween 2022.  That is what happened indeed.   The boosters for the cron/wuhan combo were a huge waste of time, but they earned Pharma billions of dollars on government contracts!  Oh, wait, the government owns the vaccines then I should suppose that it netted the shell companies Pfizer and Moderna some coin, and it netted the government some coin as well.